1 / 17

Data reconciliation and audit

Data reconciliation and audit. Ewa Wawrzy ń ska HEFCE Assurance Service. e.wawrzynska@hefce.ac.uk hesa_heses_stats@hefce.ac.uk. Outline. Introduction Derived statistics exercise Web facility Audit. time. audit. web facility 20 10 -1 1. HESES 1 0. HESA 20 10 - 11.

umay
Download Presentation

Data reconciliation and audit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Data reconciliation and audit Ewa Wawrzyńska HEFCE Assurance Service e.wawrzynska@hefce.ac.uk hesa_heses_stats@hefce.ac.uk

  2. Outline • Introduction • Derived statistics exercise • Web facility • Audit

  3. time audit web facility 2010-11 HESES10 HESA 2010-11 HESA-HESES10 reconciliation exercise HESA amendments initial response HESES11 Timeline Dec11 Jan12 Dec10 Aug11 Oct11 Feb12 Mar12

  4. Why do HEFCE look at the HESA data? • HESES census in December, yet data used for funding allocations • Assurance needed • Data reported to HESA after year end • Need to compare the two – to monitor funding • Also HESA data inform some funding allocations

  5. How do we monitor funding? • Generate HESES re-creation using HESA data • Generate HESES re-creation based on cost centre sector norms for subjects • Select institutions to explain differences between HESES and HESES re-creation • HESES re-creation supersedes HESES for funding purposes • The same with RAS and CFEE re-creation

  6. HESA-HESES – output • HESES re-creation tables • including HESES re-creation grant adjustment report, standard resource and assumed fees • HESA-HESES comparison summary tables • Equivalent HESES tables • Individualised data for each HESA record; includes all derived fields used to re-create HESES HESES individualised data differences HESES re-creation example

  7. Outputs • HESES re-creation • HESES re-creation based on cost sector centre norms • Widening Participation (WP) and Teaching Enhancement and Student Success (TESS) outputs • RAS re-creation – research funding monitoring • Co-Funded Employer Engagement (CFEE) re-creation • Partial completion weighting • Aggregate and individualised files

  8. HESA-HESES exercise • HESA-HESES comparison – every year HESA used to monitor funding • HESES re-created for all HEIs • All HEIs are tested against the ‘selection criteria’ • Similar exercise is conducted for FE Colleges using ILR data

  9. HESA-HESES – no response required • does not mean that HESA and HESES data are consistent • discrepancies may impact WP and TESS funding allocations or NSP calculations • does not exempt HEI from subsequent data audit/retrospective funding adjustments

  10. HESA-HESES – response required • Submit Action and Implementation Plan • Action Plan to remove discrepancies between HESA-HESES and should address all of the following (where relevant): • - Errors in HESES (explain) • - Errors in HESA (amend) • - Problems of fit with the HEFCE algorithms (explain and provide overrides) • Implementation Plan to ensure that similar errors do not recur in the future

  11. HESA-HESES – response required selected action plan Problems of fit Errors in HESA Errors in HESES overrides amendments explanations regenerate outputs funding calculations sign off

  12. HEFCE web facility • Not compulsory BUT … numerous benefits • Data quality • Reduced likelihood of being selected = potentially LESS WORK and reduced likelihood of funding adjustments • Early identification of discrepancies • Verification of the derived fields • Informed estimates for future

  13. HEFCE web facility • Available in summer every year • Unlimited use/useable for entire year • Submit HESA data to the HEFCE extranet or to HESA via IRIS; secure and confidential • Comprehensive guide on using web facility • Full description of algorithms • Trouble-shooting guidance and details of ‘problems of fit’ • Support through ‘helpline’ and e-mail

  14. Web facility outputs • HESES re-creation • HESES re-creation based on cost sector centre norms • RAS re-creation – research funding monitoring • Co-Funded Employer Engagement (CFEE) re-creation • Inform Widening Participation (WP) and Teaching Enhancement and Student Success (TESS) allocations • RDP supervision fund allocation • Indicative National Scholarship Programme (NSP) allocation • TRAC(T) FTE for price group review • Audit tests

  15. Data audit - briefly • Another source of assurance • Mixture of procedural and risk based approach • Process (explained in a detailed opening letter) • Pre-visit data review: request for information • The audit visit: detailed sampling • Report • Follow-up work if necessary • Funding implications, if applicable • Audit programmeat http://www.hefce.ac.uk/finance/assurance/data/

  16. Reconciliation exercise v data audit • Data audit • More focused on systems and processes • Looking at data at source • How data is returned to HESA (key fields used for funding purposes) • BUT • Limited sample size • Only a limited number of institutions • Reconciliation exercise • Every year for all institutions • Looking at all students • Looking at general processes that generate data • BUT • Can only detect inconsistencies between the two data sources; unhelpful if both are incorrect

  17. Further reading About the reconciliation exercise at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2011/11_13/ About the web facility at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/datacoll/derived/webfacility/ Thank you for your attention!

More Related