1 / 23

Electronic and Magnetic Properties of YCrO 3 and YFeO 3 – A First Principles Study

Electronic and Magnetic Properties of YCrO 3 and YFeO 3 – A First Principles Study. Vidhya G Nair Department of Physics IIT Madras. HPC Symposium 2014 - April 25, 2014. Overview of the talk. Introduction to multiferroics Computational details Results and Discussion YFeO 3 YCrO 3.

urbana
Download Presentation

Electronic and Magnetic Properties of YCrO 3 and YFeO 3 – A First Principles Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electronic and Magnetic Properties of YCrO3 and YFeO3–A First Principles Study Vidhya G Nair Department of Physics IIT Madras HPC Symposium 2014 - April 25, 2014

  2. Overview of the talk • Introduction to multiferroics • Computational details • Results and Discussion • YFeO3 • YCrO3

  3. Introduction Multiferroics more than one ferroic order coexist and are coupled (magnetic, electric or elastic) (usually refers specifically to) • Rare earth chromites and ferrites shows multiferroic behavior. • YCrO3 and YFeO3 • orthorhombic structure • canted antiferromagnet • Neel temperature (TN) of ~140 K and ~655 K [1, 2] Daniel Khomskii, Physics2, 20 (2009) • [1] J. R. Sahuet al., J. Mater. Chem., 17, (2007) 42. • [2] M. Shang et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 102, (2013) 062903.

  4. Computational details • First principles calculation of the electronic and magnetic properties of YCrO3 and YFeO3 is performed within generalized gradient approximation. • The calculations are executed by employing the Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package (CASTEP) code based on density functional theory. • The calculations were performed by the ultrasoft pseudopotential method with plane-wave basis which describes the interaction of electrons with ion cores. • Structural optimizations are carried out for both samples with all possible magnetic structures.

  5. Different magnetic spin structures G-type AFM C-type AFM A-type AFM FM

  6. YFeO3 Space group - Pnma Lattice parameter a = 5.7909 Å b = 7.7354 Å c = 5.4407 Å α = β = γ = 90o G-type AFM

  7. Comparison of Total energies

  8. Band structure and Density of states (DOS) of YFeO3 Band structure and density of states of G-type antiferromagnet YFeO3 shows the insulating behavior.

  9. Effect of Hubbard parameter (U) Density of states without U parameter. Density of states with U = 5 eV.

  10. Effect of Hubbard U parameter for G-AFM Density of states of G-type AFM with U = 1 to 5 eV. Partial density of states contribution to total DOS

  11. Estimation of magnetic – ordering temperature • To estimate the magnetic-ordering temperature for YFeO3, the Heisenberg exchange constants corresponding to the nearest-neighbor magnetic couplings for the magnetic configuration is determined. • The calculated energies are mapped onto a simple Heisenberg model, • From the coupling constants, the magnetic-ordering temperature is calculated using the mean-field approximation. • The magnetic transition temperature for G-type magnetic structure is calculated to be 700 K which is close to that of the experimental value TN = 655 K. Magnetic moment Fe3+ : 3.82 μB (5 μB)

  12. YCrO3 Space group - Pnma Lattice parameter a = 5.5157 Å b = 7.5301 Å c = 5.2409 Å α = β = γ = 90o G-type AFM

  13. Comparison of Total energies

  14. G-type Antiferromagnetic ordering Band Gap = 1.435 eV Magnetic moment Cr3+ : 2.98 μB (3 μB) • The magnetic transition temperature for G-type magnetic structure is calculated to be 137 K (TN = 140 K).

  15. Hubbard U = 1 (G-type) Band Gap = 1.648 eV

  16. Comparison of experimental and theoretical results

  17. LIBRA cluster • We are extensively using LIBRA cluster for running our programs. • The total time used for each calculation depends on the sample. • For the present samples, the run time for each structural optimization is approximately one week, if 4 processors are used for calculation.

  18. Acknowledgment • High Performance Computing Environment (HPCE), IIT Madras. • DBT for funding (CASTEP). • Mr. V. Ravichandran, HPCE • Mrs. P. Gayathri, HPCE • Mr. C. Ganeshraj

  19. Thank You

  20. Ferromagnetic ordering Band Gap = 0.759 eV

  21. C-type antiferromagnetic ordering Band Gap = 1.082 eV

  22. A-type antiferromagnetic ordering

More Related