1 / 21

Economic efficiency of seismic vulnearbility and retrofit measures - a multicriteria analysi s

Economic efficiency of seismic vulnearbility and retrofit measures - a multicriteria analysi s. Iuliana Arma ş Maria Boştenaru. Overview. Analysis scales Review existing Methods Actors Ontology Indicators Analytical hierarchy Automated methods

Download Presentation

Economic efficiency of seismic vulnearbility and retrofit measures - a multicriteria analysi s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Economic efficiency of seismic vulnearbility and retrofit measures - a multicriteriaanalysis Iuliana Armaş Maria Boştenaru

  2. Overview • Analysis scales • Review existing Methods • Actors • Ontology • Indicators • Analytical hierarchy • Automated methods • Structural – socio-economic analysis interdependence • Conclusions

  3. Analysis scales • Element • Building • Neighbourhood/city level

  4. Existing methods • Urban scale • At urban planning level there were Fingerhuth and Koch who clarified the moderating role of the architect, among experts, passive public and active affected people. • At regional planning level it was Strassert (1995) developing a method of balancing we will later employ. • Building scale • Inclusion of the factor cost into multicriteria decision analysis has been done more recently by the team of Caterino et al (2007 and 2009), with a view to bracing of a reinforced concrete building, but employing passive damping. • For technical decision we built upon the book of Malczewski (1999) regarding spatial problems. • For the role of the architect Richter (course work) made a role model in the decision space between goals, resources, benefits and costs. • In renovation the model used in Weissenhof was described by Nägele (1992). Also Nägele (1992) employed balancing. • The ATC-40 considers a series of actors specifically for seismic retrofit. Both the latter employ matrixes (decision tables). • The role of the users were considered also by Ottokar Uhl in the model developed for the Hollabrunn in the 1970s, the glory time of participatism.

  5. Urban scale - Actors • Geologist • Civil engineer • Economic-inhabitant • Social - inhabitant

  6. Building - Actors • Architect • Civil engineer • Social - inhabitant • Economic - investor

  7. Actors in WHE • Architect • Civil engineer • Socio-economic aspects • Proiect management

  8. Exemple of interwar building WHE • WHE

  9. Building ontology > IT

  10. Indicators building

  11. Indicators in WHE • Taxonomy in progress

  12. Urban ontology (COST TU0801 training school) • Sisi

  13. Analitical hierarchy urban

  14. Indicatori - urban

  15. Methods of indicator aggregation • pair-wise comparison and outranking techniques were used to weight the relative importance of alternatives in the groups of sub-criteria, based on expert knowledge.

  16. Analytical hierarchy building

  17. Interdependence structural – socio-economic

  18. Formulas – principle of addition Total reparationcost = reparationcostforyield/crushcolum x nr. ofyieldcrush/columns + Reparation costforspallcolumn x nr. ofspallcolumns + Reparation costforriftscolum x nr. ofriftedcolums + Reparation costforyield/crush beam x nr. ofyield/crushbeams + Reparation costforspall beam x nr. ofspallbeams + Reparation costforrifts beam x nr. ofriftbeams Whilethenumberscanbecountedwiththeprocedureshownbefore Total preventiveretrofitcosts = Costsfor a measuresdevice x nr. ofelements Alternatively a projectmanagementsoftwarecanbeemployed.

  19. Comparison to agent based automated method • Computer tools can aid local decision makers in postearthquake disaster staff. Fiedrich (2004) proposed the integrative model EQ-RESQUE to support the prioritisation of intervention zones and the efficient allocation of help-and-rescue resources through action proposals. A distributed simulation system (high level architecture) connects its two interacting components: • simulation of the dynamic disaster environment and of the work of resources; • decision process modelling using software agents mathematically optimised with expert knowledge concerning the multiple tasks and the communication structures and decision competences within the disaster staff.

  20. Conclusions • Positive aspects: • Easy to follow and to understand decision process, especially for the stakeholders • Drawbacks: • Subjective approache to a high degree • Improvement proposals: • New algorythm ?

  21. Bucharest Thank you Iuliana Armaş Maria Boştenaru

More Related