1 / 20

Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow. Maintaining quality the wiki way. Peer review. Helps to ensure quality, credibility, accuracy, clinical value of content Establishes a reliable body of research and knowledge, sets standards for a discipline

vadin
Download Presentation

Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OrthopaediaPeer Review Workflow Maintaining quality the wiki way

  2. Peer review • Helps to ensure quality, credibility, accuracy, clinical value of content • Establishes a reliable body of research and knowledge, sets standards for a discipline • Gives authors the opportunity to correct weaknesses identified by peer reviewers • Prevents dissemination of unsubstantiated claims, faulty interpretations, irrelevant findings, personal biases

  3. Content development and quality • Editorial Boards from subspeciality associations oversee the content development and maintenance of quality using the Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow Engine

  4. Case example: AOFAS & Foot and Ankle Section

  5. Labels used for tracking, activation of peer review workflow • “aofas” label – article is part of the AOFAS content partnership collection • “aofas_review” – article added to the AOFAS Peer Review Workflow • “aofas_dev” – article under development by AOFAS member aofas_review label can only be removed by an Orthopaedia Administrator

  6. User groups created for “editors”and “reviewers”

  7. AOFAS peer review workflow authors aofas-reviewers aofas-editors

  8. Peer review workflow engine • Workflow can be customized and configured to meet specific needs of subspecialty society

  9. Draft • A newly contributed article is labeled as a “Draft,” triggering peer review

  10. Under review • An article that moves to “Under Review” is “locked” – it can only be edited by the AOFAS Reviewers

  11. Reviewed • An article that has been reviewed goes back to the author for revisions recommended by the reviewers or is submitted to Editor-in-Chief

  12. Published • Once the Editor-in-Chief is satisfied, the article is published

  13. Peer review workflow Workflow process shows states of peer review process and dates. All edits and versions are tracked as an activity log.

  14. Workflow report Workflow reports track the states of articles.

  15. Workflow emails

  16. Notifications By clicking on “Watch Page Family,” the AOFAS Editorial Board is notified of any changes made to the articles.

  17. Call for articles • Articles written according to a template to ensure uniformity • Potential authors asked to contact Editor-in-Chief • Allows control over how articles are developed

  18. Article under development • Once an author has been approved to write on a topic, the page is reserved for that author and the article is labeled “Under Development”

  19. Disclaimer • Disclaimer for the section clearly indicates that changes are subject to modification or deletion

  20. Disclaimer • Disclaimer appears on articles developed under content partnership

More Related