1 / 34

Optimum Currency Areas

Optimum Currency Areas. The question of a single currency in a large area. Should currency area borders coincide with national borders? is it a good idea for California to be on the US dollar?. The Economic Answer. Benefits and Costs involved in adopting a common currency.

valmai
Download Presentation

Optimum Currency Areas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Optimum Currency Areas

  2. The question of a single currency in a large area • Should currency area borders coincide with national borders? • is it a good idea for California to be on the US dollar?

  3. The Economic Answer • Benefits and Costs involved in adopting a common currency. • The solution has to involve trading off these benefits.

  4. In a Nutshell • The benefits: • money exhibits increasing returns to scale • the world has the way to maximise this benefit • The costs: • loss of monetary and exchange rate instruments • matters in presence of: • price and wage stickiness • asymmetric shocks.

  5. Focusing on Costs • Look at the costs: • No precise way of estimating costs and benefits so, in the end, a matter of judgement. • Look at asymmetric shocks: • how they create trouble • what makes them more likely • what makes them less painful.

  6. A demand shock • Simplest example: an adverse demand shock: how can the exchange rate help?

  7. Asymmetric Shock in currency union (currency depreciates) EPB/P* EPA/P* S S A A A’ λo C’’ C’’ C’ C’ λ2 B B’ B’’ λ1 D D D’ D’ Output Gap 0 Country A 0 Country B Output Gap

  8. Asymmetric Shock • After an assymetric show moving demand for country A from D to D’ • Country A wants a depreciation according to a new equilibrium B, and real exchange rate λ1 • Country B unhappy, as for the same real exchange rate it faces inflationary excess demand BB’ • However, with unchanged real exchange rate λ0 country A faces excess supply AA’

  9. Asymmetric Shock in currency union (currency stays put) EPA/P* EPB/P* S S A A λo A’ C’’ C’’ C’ C’ λ2 B B’ B’’ λ1 D D D’ D’ Country A Output Gap Country B 0 0 Output Gap

  10. Implications of Asymmetric Shocks • Both countries are hurt when they share the same currency. • This is an unavoidable cost. • Next questions: • what reduces the incidence of asymmetric shocks? • what makes it easier to cope with shocks when they occur. • The analysis develops six OCA criteria.

  11. Six OCA criteria • Three classic (economic) criteria • Mundell • Kenen • McKinnon • Three political criteria

  12. Criterion 1 (Mundell): Labour Mobility In an OCA labour moves easily across national borders.

  13. Criterion 1 (Mundell): Labour Mobility • Caveats: • labour mobility is easy within national borders (culture, language, legislation, welfare, etc.) • capital mobility: difference between financial and physical capital • in presence of country specialisation, skills also matter.

  14. Criterion 2 (Kenen): Production Diversification • Countries whose production and exports are widely diversified and of similar structure form an OCA. • Indeed, in that case, there are few asymmetric shocks and each of them is likely to be of small concern.

  15. Criterion 3 (McKinnon): Openness • Countries which are very open to trade and trade heavily with each other form an OCA. • Distinguish between traded and nontraded goods: • traded good prices are set worldwide • a small economy is price-taker, so the exchange rate does not affect competitiveness. • If all goods are traded, domestic good prices must be flexible and the exchange rate does not matter for competitiveness.

  16. Criterion 4: Fiscal Transfers • Countries that agree to compensate each other for adverse shock form an OCA. • Transfers can act as an insurance that mitigates the costs of an asymmetric shock. • Transfers exist within national borders: • implicitly through the welfare system • explicitly in federal states.

  17. Criterion 5: Homogeneous Preferences • Countries that share a wide consensus on the way to deal with shocks form an OCA. • Matters primarily for symmetric shocks: • prevalent when the Kenen criterion is satisfied. • May also help for asymmetric shocks: • better understanding of partners’ actions • encourages transfers.

  18. Criterion 6: Commonality of Destiny • Countries that view themselves as sharing a common destiny better accept the costs of operating an OCA. • A common currency will always face occasional asymmetric shocks that result in temporary conflicts of interests: • this calls for accepting such economic costs in the name of a higher purpose.

  19. Is Europe An OCA? (Asymmetric shocks)

  20. Is Europe An OCA? (Diversification and dissimilarity)

  21. Is Europe An OCA? (Openness)

  22. Inside the OCA Index: Labour Mobility • Low internal EU labour mobility • EU must factor in many migration costs: • moving costs • risk of becoming unemployed • longer run career opportunities • family prospects • eligibility to welfare • taxation • cultural/linguistic differences • national attachment.

  23. Internal migration

  24. Inside the OCA Index: Labour Mobility

  25. Inside the OCA Index: Transfers • The EU does not satisfy the transfer criterion. • The overall EU budget: • is low, slightly over 1% of EU GDP • entirely used for administration, CAP, regional and structural funds.

  26. Inside the OCA Index: Homogeneity of Preferences • Little is known about this criterion.

  27. Inside the OCA Index: Solidarity vs Nationalism • Little is known about this criterion. • Tendency of new member states to support joint decision-making more than Nordic countries • Nationalism does not overall exert powerful influence.

  28. Joint decisions or decide for yourself?

  29. Overall • The OCA glass is half full, or half empty. • Living in a monetary union may help fulfill the OCA criteria over time.

  30. Will Trade Deepen? • Mounting evidence that eliminating exchange rate volatility by adopting a common currency raises trade a lot: • Baldwin et al (2008) shows euro to have increased trade by 5% so far

  31. Will Diversification Grow or Decline? • Argument 1: intra-industry trade will grow. • Argument 2: specialisation will increase. • No firm conclusion so far.

  32. EMU and Labour Markets • Mobility may not change much, as labour markets remain rigid with unemployment protection

  33. Are the Other Criteria Endogenous? • Transfers: • currently no support for more taxes of finance transfers. • Homogeneity of preferences and Commonality of destiny: • no presumption that it will change soon. In the end: Monetary union is not only about economics!

More Related