1 / 40

Modern Information Retrieval Chapter 7: Text Operations

Modern Information Retrieval Chapter 7: Text Operations. Ricardo Baeza-Yates Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. Document Preprocessing. Lexical analysis of the text Elimination of stopwords Stemming Selection of index terms Construction of term categorization structures. Lexical Analysis of the Text.

Download Presentation

Modern Information Retrieval Chapter 7: Text Operations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modern Information RetrievalChapter 7: Text Operations Ricardo Baeza-Yates Berthier Ribeiro-Neto

  2. Document Preprocessing • Lexical analysis of the text • Elimination of stopwords • Stemming • Selection of index terms • Construction of term categorization structures

  3. Lexical Analysis of the Text • Word separators • space • digits • hyphens • punctuation marks • the case of the letters

  4. Elimination of Stopwords • A list of stopwords • words that are too frequent among the documents • articles, prepositions, conjunctions, etc. • Can reduce the size of the indexing structure considerably • Problem • Search for “to be or not to be”?

  5. Stemming • Example • connect, connected, connecting, connection, connections • effectiveness --> effective --> effect • picnicking --> picnic • king -\-> k • Removing strategies • affix removal: intuitive, simple • table lookup • successor variety • n-gram

  6. Index Terms Selection • Motivation • A sentence is usually composed of nouns, pronouns, articles, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and connectives. • Most of the semantics is carried by the noun words. • Identification of noun groups • A noun group is a set of nouns whose syntactic distance in the text does not exceed a predefined threshold

  7. Thesauri • Peter Roget, 1988 • Example cowardlyadj. Ignobly lacking in courage: cowardly turncoats Syns: chicken (slang), chicken-hearted, craven, dastardly, faint-hearted, gutless, lily-livered, pusillanimous, unmanly, yellow (slang), yellow-bellied (slang). • A controlled vocabulary for the indexing and searching

  8. The Purpose of a Thesaurus • To provide a standard vocabulary for indexing and searching • To assist users with locating terms for proper query formulation • To provide classified hierarchies that allow the broadening and narrowing of the current query request

  9. Thesaurus Term Relationships • BT: broader • NT: narrower • RT: non-hierarchical, but related

  10. Term Selection Automatic Text Processing by G. Salton, Chap 9, Addison-Wesley, 1989.

  11. Automatic Indexing • Indexing: • assign identifiers (index terms) to text documents. • Identifiers: • single-term vs. term phrase • controlled vs. uncontrolled vocabulariesinstruction manuals, terminological schedules, … • objective vs. nonobjective text identifiers cataloging rules define, e.g., author names, publisher names, dates of publications, …

  12. Two Issues • Issue 1: indexing exhaustivity • exhaustive: assign a large number of terms • nonexhaustive • Issue 2: term specificity • broad terms (generic)cannot distinguish relevant from nonrelevant documents • narrow terms (specific)retrieve relatively fewer documents, but most of them are relevant

  13. Parameters of retrieval effectiveness • Recall • Precision • Goal high recall and high precision

  14. Retrieved Part b a Nonrelevant Items Relevant Items d c

  15. A Joint Measure • F-score •  is a parameter that encode the importance of recall and procedure. • =1: equal weight • <1: precision is more important • >1: recall is more important

  16. Choices of Recall and Precision • Both recall and precision vary from 0 to 1. • Particular choices of indexing and search policies have produced variations in performance ranging from 0.8 precision and 0.2 recall to 0.1 precision and 0.8 recall. • In many circumstance, both the recall and the precision varying between 0.5 and 0.6 are more satisfactory for the average users.

  17. Term-Frequency Consideration • Function words • for example, "and", "or", "of", "but", … • the frequencies of these words are high in all texts • Content words • words that actually relate to document content • varying frequencies in the different texts of a collect • indicate term importance for content

  18. A Frequency-Based Indexing Method • Eliminate common function words from the document texts by consulting a special dictionary, or stop list, containing a list of high frequency function words. • Compute the term frequency tfij for all remaining terms Tj in each document Di, specifying the number of occurrences of Tj in Di. • Choose a threshold frequency T, and assign to each document Di all term Tj for which tfij > T.

  19. Inverse Document Frequency • Inverse Document Frequency (IDF) for term Tjwhere dfj (document frequency of term Tj) is the number of documents in which Tj occurs. • fulfil both the recall and the precision • occur frequently in individual documents but rarely in the remainder of the collection

  20. TFxIDF • Weight wij of a term Tj in a document di • Eliminating common function words • Computing the value of wij for each term Tj in each document Di • Assigning to the documents of a collection all terms with sufficiently high (tfxidf) factors

  21. Term-discrimination Value • Useful index terms • Distinguish the documents of a collection from each other • Document Space • Two documents are assigned very similar term sets, when the corresponding points in document configuration appear close together • When a high-frequency term without discrimination is assigned, it will increase the document space density

  22. A Virtual Document Space After Assignment of good discriminator After Assignment of poor discriminator Original State

  23. Good Term Assignment • When a term is assigned to the documents of a collection, the few objects to which the term is assigned will be distinguished from the rest of the collection. • This should increase the average distance between the objects in the collection and hence produce a document space less dense than before.

  24. Poor Term Assignment • A high frequency term is assigned that does not discriminate between the objects of a collection. Its assignment will render the document more similar. • This is reflected in an increasein document spacedensity.

  25. Term Discrimination Value • Definitiondvj = Q - Qjwhere Q and Qj are space densities before and after the assignments of term Tj. • dvj>0, Tj is a good term; dvj<0, Tj is a poor term.

  26. Variations of Term-Discrimination Value with Document Frequency Document Frequency N Low frequency dvj=0 Medium frequency dvj>0 High frequency dvj<0

  27. TFijx dvj • wij = tfijx dvj • compared with • : decrease steadily with increasing document frequency • dvj: increase from zero to positive as the document frequency of the term increase, decrease shapely as the document frequency becomes still larger.

  28. Document Centroid • Issue: efficiency problemN(N-1) pairwise similarities • Document centroidC = (c1, c2, c3, ..., ct)where wij is the j-th term in document i. • Space density

  29. Probabilistic Term Weighting • GoalExplicit distinctions between occurrences of terms in relevant and nonrelevant documents of a collection • DefinitionGiven a user query q, and the ideal answer set of the relevant documents • From decision theory, the best ranking algorithm for a document D

  30. Probabilistic Term Weighting • Pr(rel), Pr(nonrel):document’s a priori probabilities of relevance and nonrelevance • Pr(D|rel), Pr(D|nonrel):occurrence probabilities of document D in the relevant and nonrelevant document sets

  31. Assumptions • Terms occur independently in documents

  32. Derivation Process

  33. Given a document D=(d1, d2, …, dt) Assume di is either 0 (absent) or 1 (present). For a specific document D Pr(xi=1|rel) = pi Pr(xi=0|rel) = 1-pi Pr(xi=1|nonrel) = qi Pr(xi=0|nonrel) = 1-qi

  34. Term Relevance Weight

  35. Issue • How to computepjand qj? pj = rj / R qj = (dfj-rj)/(N-R) • R: the total number of relevant documents • N: the total number of documents

  36. Estimation of Term-Relevance • The occurrence probability of a term in the nonrelevant documents qj is approximated by the occurrence probability of the term in the entire document collectionqj= dfj/ N • The occurrence probabilities of the terms in the small number of relevant documents is equal by using a constant value pj= 0.5 for all j.

  37. Comparison = idfj  When N is sufficiently large, N-dfj N,

  38. Estimation of Term-Relevance • Estimate the number of relevant documents rj in the collection that contain term Tj as a function of the known document frequency tfj of the term Tj.pj = rj / R qj = (dfj-rj)/(N-R)R: an estimate of the total number of relevant documents in the collection.

  39. Summary • Inverse document frequency, idfj • tfij*idfj (TFxIDF) • Term discrimination value, dvj • tfij*dvj • Probabilistic term weightingtrj • tfij*trj • Global properties of terms in a document collection

More Related