1 / 30

Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006

Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006. Sharron Hunt Melissa Fincher. Georgia’s Student Assessment Program. Includes an array of criterion-referenced tests (including an alternate) and a norm-referenced test Built from the ground up to be inclusive

vandeventer
Download Presentation

Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006 Sharron Hunt Melissa Fincher

  2. Georgia’s Student Assessment Program • Includes an array of criterion-referenced tests (including an alternate) and a norm-referenced test • Built from the ground up to be inclusive • GA includes teachers of special populations in all phases of test development • GA includes all students in pilots and field tests

  3. Georgia’s Student Assessment Program • GA provides a menu of traditional accommodation options • Presentation • Response • Setting • Scheduling • Accommodations are provided during pilots and field tests

  4. Georgia’s Student Assessment Program • Although Georgia is inclusive, some students still struggle to access the tests • Schools sought additional avenues for students who were caught between assessments – neither the general or the alternate were completely appropriate for these students

  5. Georgia’s Student Assessment Program • Georgia looked for avenues to investigate how to make assessments more accessible • Questions to answer • Who are the students struggling to access the general assessments? • What additional accommodations/modifications might assist in making the test more accessible? • About the same time…. • Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grant announced (ultimately pulled back) • Announcement of the 2% flexibility

  6. Georgia’s Student Assessment Program • Georgia moved forward with an empirical research study designed to answer those questions • The Testing Division worked with the • Division for Exceptional Students • Curriculum and Instructional Services Division

  7. Study Purpose • To investigate the effects of certain modifications on the reliability and validity of the state testing programs • Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT) • Georgia High School Graduation Tests (GHSGT) • Focus on reading and math

  8. Study Purpose • This study will help Georgia determine • What works • Who benefits • The goal of the study is to help Georgia operationalize additional options for the 2006-2007 school year

  9. What is a modification? • an alteration in the administration of an assessment that results in a possible change in the content or construct being assessed • typically either through the addition or removal of content

  10. What is an accommodation? • an alteration in the administration of an assessment that allows students to participate • how the test is administered or presented • how the student responds • Construct (what the test measures) remains the same

  11. Georgia Modification Study • Focused on selected grades and content areas • Students in grades 4 and 7 took the Reading and Math CRCT (March 2006) • Students in grade 12 took the ELA and Math GHSGT (April 2006)

  12. Georgia Modification Study • For security reasons, off-level testing was used • Grade 4 students took the 3rd grade Spring 2005 CRCT • Grade 7 students took the 6th grade Spring 2005 CRCT • Grade 12 students took the Spring 2005 GHSGT

  13. Georgia Modification Study • Study included both special education students and regular education students • The number of special education students who took the test last year at each school was identified • Tested the number of students identified, if possible • Schools randomly selected an equal number of general education students to participate

  14. Georgia Modification Study • Included all special education students, with the following exceptions: • GAA students • Students who require Braille or large print • Set a broad net to help determine the characteristics of students assisted by modifications

  15. Georgia Modification Study • Each school assigned a condition for this study • All students within the school took the test under the same condition • Both special and regular education students

  16. Georgia Modification Study CRCT (grades 4 and 7) • Three conditions • Condition 1: Resource Guides • Condition 2: Read Aloud/Calculator • Condition 3: Traditional Administration

  17. Georgia Modification Study GHSGT (grade 12) • Two conditions • Condition 1: Resource Guide • Condition 2: Traditional Administration

  18. Condition 1 – CRCT & GHSGT • Resource Guide • A single sheet (one for each content area) that provides key definitions, examples, multiplication tables etc. • A short practice test was provided to help introduce the resource guides to students; each item related to something on the resource guide • Recommended introducing sample tests and guides a couple of days before the administration

  19. Condition 1 – CRCT & GHSGT • Resource Guide Development • Committee comprised of Testing, Special Education, and Curriculum specialists reviewed the tests • identified concepts students might struggle with and discussed appropriate information for inclusion on the guide

  20. Condition 2 - CRCT • Read Aloud (Reading CRCT) • Teacher read the reading passages and questions to students • Teacher reads test verbatim • Calculator (Math CRCT) • Basic function calculators provided to schools assigned this condition

  21. Condition 3 - CRCT • Traditional Administration • Students took tests as they have always done • Special education students received the standard accommodations they normally receive • Regular education students did not receive accommodations

  22. Condition 2 - GHSGT • Traditional Administration • Students took tests as they have always done • Special education students received the standard accommodations they normally receive • Regular education students did not receive accommodations

  23. Georgia Modification Study • A survey was be provided for each special education student • The person most knowledgeable about the student completed the survey • This information will be critical in determining who benefits from the modifications

  24. Georgia Modification Study • Survey collected important information about each special education student • Student’s disability/ies • Severity of disability/ies • IEP objectives for reading and math • Time in mainstream/general ed classroom • Area/s served • Instructional services • Type of accommodation, if any

  25. Georgia Modification Study • Administration Procedures • Follow all administration protocols as outlined in the Examiner’s Manual • Complete all student demographics on answer documents, including State-Required Codes

  26. Georgia Modification Study • Administration Procedures • Followed all administration protocols as outlined in the Examiner’s Manual • Completed all student demographics on answer documents, including State-Required Codes • Complete survey for each special education student

  27. Georgia Modification Study • Key Research Questions • Are there performance differences for students with disabilities on the CRCT and GHSGT when these assessments are administered under modified conditions? • Are there performance differences for regular education students on the CRCT and GHSGT when these assessments are administered under modified conditions?

  28. Georgia Modification Study • Key Research Questions • How, if at all, do performance differences on the traditional versus modified version of the CRCT or GHSGT differ for students with disabilities compared to regular education students? • Are the CRCT and GHSGT reliable and valid assessments when administered under modified conditions?

  29. Georgia Modification Study • Currently analyzing data to answer the research questions • Analysis at the item level • Are certain items more likely to function differently? • Analysis at the form level • How does the test form function under each condition (modified vs traditional) for each group of students?

  30. Georgia Modification Study Sharron Hunt, Director of Testing shunt@doe.k12.ga.us / 404.657.0314 Melissa Fincher, Assistant Director of Testing mfincher@doe.k12.ga.us / 404.651.9405

More Related