1 / 6

Peer Effects on Corporate Cash Holdings

Peer Effects on Corporate Cash Holdings. NTUICF 2012 Taipei Discussant: Wei- Hsien Li. Summary. Sample: 2,855 firms from Compustat SIC 2000-3999 1980-2011 Document that cash ratio of the firm is related to the peer firms’ average cash holding

vanna
Download Presentation

Peer Effects on Corporate Cash Holdings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peer Effects on Corporate Cash Holdings NTUICF 2012 Taipei Discussant: Wei-Hsien Li

  2. Summary • Sample: • 2,855 firms from Compustat • SIC 2000-3999 • 1980-2011 • Document that cash ratio of the firm is related to the peer firms’ average cash holding • Using the lagged idiosyncratic stock returns of peer firms as the instrumental variable • Mimicking is stronger (weaker) if the firm has higher R&D (Sales)

  3. What I like about this paper • Asking a very interesting question • A careful treatment on the potential endogeneity concern

  4. Major concerns • Why mimicking cash-holding? • Theoretic background • Benoit (maybe), Lieberman and Asaba(not directly related to cash) • Are firms mimicking cash-holding or mimicking some uses of cash-holding? • Current tests cannot differentiate the mimicking from alternative stories • IV procedure • Following Leary and Roberts (2012) • Same IV for leverage, cash-holding, and other corporate decisions?

  5. Suggestions • Among various corporate decisions which could be mimicked, why study cash-holding first? • The usage of cash • For distinguishing this paper fromLeary and Roberts (2012) • R&D (in the paper), identify the leader and follower • CAPX, dividend (in Leary and Roberts (2012)) • M&A announcement? • Does the followers in the merger wave save cash following the leader’s action?

  6. Suggestions • How the mimicking changes across time? • Uncertainty, growth opportunity, competition • Who is mimicking who? • Unsuccessful firms mimicking successful firms • Marginal value of cash • Propose an alternative IV procedure

More Related