1 / 29

Greenwashing Awareness

Greenwashing Awareness. Presented by Christian Frederick. Eco-Friendly?. Common Descriptions. “Deceptive Practice” A way suppliers try to “trick” customers Placing a different “spin” on a product (concerning environmental traits) “Insufficient offering of information”. Our Basic Definition.

vartan
Download Presentation

Greenwashing Awareness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Greenwashing Awareness Presented by Christian Frederick

  2. Eco-Friendly?

  3. Common Descriptions • “Deceptive Practice” • A way suppliers try to “trick” customers • Placing a different “spin” on a product (concerning environmental traits) • “Insufficient offering of information”

  4. Our Basic Definition • Greenwashing: • A marketing technique which offers skewed or inaccurate information regarding a product’s sustainability or environmental aspects.

  5. Importance of Awareness • Improves buyers ability to identify valid claims • Increases the number of Environmentally Preferred Products • These “EPPs” hold a higher sustainable/environmental quality

  6. Components of EPPs • Recycled Content • Energy Efficiency • Compostable or Recyclable • Utilize Renewable Resources • Fairly Traded • Relatively Less Toxic

  7. Eco-Labels • Third Party Certifications, Self-Certifications, Standards, Guidelines, etc. • Not always appropriate or valid • Learn to ask or look for: • Validity of the standard • Standard setting process • Verification process

  8. Energy Star Example • Validity: International standard backed by the EPA and U.S. Department of Energy • Standard Setting Process: Guidelines and requirements are published for manufactures to follow (not quite self-certification) • Verification: Random audits by EPA to reaffirm label placement (possible manipulation)

  9. Greenwashing Strategies • Vagueness or lack of clarity • Irrelevance or distraction • Statements without any support provided or no data to back it up • Simply lies and inaccurate information

  10. Vagueness

  11. Vagueness • Compressed gas dusters from OfficeMax • 100% Ozone Safe • How so? In what way? What does “ozone safe” mean?

  12. Irrelevance

  13. Irrelevance • HP LaserjetToner Cartridge (OEM#: 05A (CE505A)) • Labeled with “19% Post-Consumer Content” • This recycled attribute is only with consideration of the packaging; the recycled content label is irrelevant with respect to this product

  14. No Proof

  15. Simply Not True • Marcal Brand Facial Tissue • Among other qualities, mentions “NRDC Certified” • One problem: The NRDC does not give out certifications!

  16. Recycled Content • PRE vs. POST • PRE-consumer content is when a manufacturer reuses its own supplies (limits their waste stream) • POST-consumer content is the recycled materials which utilize recycling systems (limits the overuse of resources) • POST-consumer content is BETTER

  17. Importance of Recycled Content • Easiest way for a buyer to identify a “green” product • Easy to see, measurable • The higher the content, the better • Major role in purchasing sustainable office supplies

  18. Research Strategy • Top ten suppliers based on highest amount of products provided to UCSC in FY’11 • Investigated top commodities from these suppliers • Commodities chosen based on largest volume supplied

  19. Research Results • Sustainable products easiest to identify with office supply products • Other items either do not provide enough information or there is yet an efficient life-cycle cost formula to apply • There is room to increase the number of recycled products dramatically

  20. Top 52 Office Supply Products

  21. Set-backs in the Research • Full sustainability profile of products is not clear and complete for every product • Need life-cycle cost formula for better analysis

  22. What’s Next? • Focus our efforts on recycled content • POST-consumer content especially • Improvement is absolutely obtainable • High number of in-house alternatives, we do have options! • Keep an eye out for percentages

  23. Ballpoint Pens • Currently the most purchased pens have no recycled content • Alternative at O.M. with 80% PRE-consumer recycled content and similar pricing • Best option in-house for cheap, economy ballpoint pens

  24. Composition Notebooks • Currently buying generic set with zero recycled content • Alternative has paper with 40% POST-consumer content and covers with 100% POST-consumer content • A couple dollars more expensive, but with life-cycle cost included could be similar cost

  25. Copy Paper • Within top 15 paper products from O.M. there are 5 different copy paper brands we purchased last year • The recycled content of these brands ranges but there is one option which is best • 100% POST content and FSC certified is definitely the best option

  26. Conclusions • Question vague statements and demand proof • Compare products for BEST option • Currently, Office Supplies hold most potential • Offer transparency and clarity • Further improvement in the future

  27. Future References • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) • Office of Acquisition Management and Policy (OAMP) • Greenpeace’s Greenwashing Webpage • TerraChoice and the Seven Signs of Greenwashing • UCSC Green Purchasing Guide

  28. Thank You!

More Related