1 / 7

Modeling Procedure

Modeling Procedure. *Needed mid-nodes to model curves. PLANE82 – 8-Noded Quadrilateral. 198 Elements. SOLID186 – Ten- Noded Tetrahedral. 5247 Elements. Convergence. Testing Performed To Ensure Model Precision. Meshes under 2000 elements exhibited inconsistent results. Mesh 1

vartan
Download Presentation

Modeling Procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modeling Procedure *Needed mid-nodes to model curves PLANE82 – 8-Noded Quadrilateral 198 Elements SOLID186 – Ten-Noded Tetrahedral 5247 Elements

  2. Convergence Testing Performed To Ensure Model Precision Meshes under 2000 elements exhibited inconsistent results Mesh 1 1749 Elements Mesh 6 348 Elements Mesh 7 305 Elements Mesh 9 198 Elements Mesh 5 424 Elements Mesh 3 919 Elements Mesh 2 1239 Elements Mesh 4 640 Elements Mesh 1-Refined 5247 Elements

  3. Experimental Strain Testing Averaged Elemental Equivalent Stresses over Gauge Region Applied Load in Instron Machine

  4. Experimental Strain Testing

  5. Photoelastic Comparison Created photoelastic model of cam lobe from clear polymer Simulated loading in Photoelastic Apparatus Stress concentrations closely matched FE predictions

  6. Photoelastic Comparison Hard to simulate photoelastic stress fringes General stress fields similar Would have more success with Material specifications

  7. Failure Analysis Stress Results for 12.5 kN (2800 lb) Loads Exceeding 12.5 kN were found to cause excessive plastic failure Main failure regions were not in the arches Manufacturer Rating: 14.4 kN UIAA Standards require 12 kN rating for rope 20 kN (4500 lb) 15 kN (3350 lb) 30 kN (6750 lb)

More Related