1 / 14

Lexical Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension

Lexical Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension . By R. A. Mason & M. A. Just Brain Research 1146 (2007) 115-127 Presented by Tatiana Luchkina. Background . Lexical ambiguity demands the reader to select one Mg & retain the possibility of using another Mg at the same time;

velvet
Download Presentation

Lexical Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lexical Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension By R. A. Mason & M. A. Just Brain Research 1146 (2007) 115-127 Presented by Tatiana Luchkina

  2. Background • Lexical ambiguity demands the reader to select one Mg & retain the possibility of using another Mg at the same time; • This ability is correlated with the memory capacity of the reader + the frequency of the ambiguous W Mgs; • Correct analysis requires inhibition of the alternative Mg, erroneous analysis – creates a garden path effect;

  3. Lexical Ambiguity • Biased: a word’s Mgs are asymmetric in frequency, e.g., • This time the ball was moved …. ….because it was always so well attended • Balanced: two equally likely Mgs, e.g., …the cell looked small…. because it was piled high with supplies

  4. BallCell Garden path effectMultiple Mgs maintained Q: Which ambiguity type takes longer to process??

  5. Previous studies of Lexical Ambiguity • Majority were grounded in behaviorist tradition, measuring: • Reading times/response times • Eye movements • Cross-modal priming effects How about brain activity during the processing of lexical ambiguity?

  6. Ambiguity & the brain • Left Hemisphere – rapid fine semantic coding (only relevant Mgs); • Right Hemisphere – slow coarse semantic coding (activates a broad spectrum of meanings);

  7. Left inferior (red) & superior (green) frontal regions become active while processing ambiguity

  8. Study • Brain imaging (fMRI) used to measure brain activity during the reading of Ss with lexically-ambiguous words vs. matched control words; • Rationale: to measure brain activity when ambiguity occurs in early (biased) or late (unbiased) selection of meaning; • How: brain responses to the processes of ambiguity resolution relate to individual differences in working memory capacity

  9. Experiment: • 12 right-handed volunteer college students; • Stimuli: 36 sentences (ambiguous vs. control) with the target appearing before any disambiguating context; • Sentences presented on the screen 1 W at a time, at a normal reading rate; A yes/no comprehension Q followed; • Cerebral activation measured using blood oxygenation level contrast; Dep & Indep Variables: degrees & areas of cortical activation; individual’s working memory capacity; ambiguity types;

  10. Findings • Lex. Ambiguity evokes extra processing due to generation, retention, selection of multiple meanings and coherence monitoring; • Reading of ambiguous Ss activated left inferior frontal gyros more than reading of control Ss; • Biased condition only produced additional activation clusters in inferior/superior frontal regions of both hemispheres; • Activation in the right hemisphere - spillover of processing to help resolve secondary Mgs;

  11. Biased Ambiguity activates Right Inferior Frontal Region (circled in red)

  12. Balanced Ambiguity – left inferior frontal region active only

  13. Findings, cont’d. • Activation patterns were correlated with the reading spans of the subjects, which reflected their working memory capacity; • Readers with lower reading spans use right hemisphere, esp. right inferior frontal area, to resolve ambiguities & maintain multiple meanings during disambiguation; • Bilateral extra activation occurs selectively & is minimal in the high-span subjects;

More Related