1 / 17

Kepler Dust Cover Ejection Event Design and Optimization

Kepler Dust Cover Ejection Event Design and Optimization. Chris Zeller and David Acton Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. czeller@ball.com dacton@ball.com. Outline. Kepler mission overview Summary of problem How and why project used AGI software Optimizing dust cover release attitude

vernon
Download Presentation

Kepler Dust Cover Ejection Event Design and Optimization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kepler Dust Cover Ejection EventDesign and Optimization Chris Zeller and David Acton Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. czeller@ball.com dacton@ball.com

  2. Outline • Kepler mission overview • Summary of problem • How and why project used AGI software • Optimizing dust cover release attitude • Key risk reductions from using AGI software

  3. Kepler mission overview Planet transit • NASA mission launched March 2009 • Search for Earth-size planets • In/near habitable zone of solar-like stars • Highly sensitive photometer • Continuously and simultaneously measures brightness of >100k stars • Flight segment design and fabrication at Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. • Scientific Operations Center at NASA Ames Research Center • Mission Operations Center at LASP – University of Colorado Variation in star brightness indicates planet transit

  4. Summary of problem • Ensure ejected photometer dust cover (DC) does not return to strike flight segment (FS) • Determine release attitude to maximize FS-to-DC distance over mission duration • Must meet power, telecom, and sun-avoidance constraints • Ensure validity of solution considering uncertainties • DC ejection direction and velocity • DC surface properties • DC release date

  5. Kepler trajectory description • Helio-centric Earth-trailing orbit avoids obscurations • ~0.5 AU range from Earth after 4 years • No traditional V maneuvers required • Periodic reaction wheel desaturations • Via RCS thruster pulses • Small but measurable effects on trajectory • STK excellent modeling fit

  6. Dust cover design and release • Protects photometer • Contamination prior to, and during launch • Stray/direct sunlight during launch and early commissioning • Deployment mechanism • Single latch, single fly-away hinge, and pre-loaded screws • Nominal release • Along vector ~ 8º from sunshadenormal, towards hinge side • Relative velocity ~0.5 m/sec • Variations must be considered • Constraints on release attitude • Power • Telecom • Photometer Sun-Avoidance

  7. STK allowed efficient and accurate analysis for important Kepler issues • STK as standard trajectory modeling and analysis tool • Chosen early in the project • Ease of use, flexibility, visualization, accuracy, and familiarity to analysts • Used for a variety of analyses • Power estimates, telecom range and angles for duration of mission • Initial Acquisition timing and angles • Deep Space Network station view periods • Optimization of quarterly roll windows • Verification of commissioning attitudes • Dust Cover Ejection event (this presentation) • Allowed validation of similar customer analyses • This analysis – STK Professional, Astrogator, Chains, and Analyzer • Astrogator provided unique features to tailor deep space analysis

  8. Baseline trajectory model • Trajectory modeled using Astrogator • Initial conditions at launch vehicle separation • Near-Earth perturbations with Earth-moon gravity model • Dust cover separation reaction modeled as a maneuver • Desaturation burns (every 3 days) using sequence loops • Deep Space propagation (6 years) Kepler-Earth body-body rotating reference frame

  9. Validation of the STK Kepler model • Validated model with JPL Navigation Team’s MONTE Tool • Tailored Astrogator propagator to determine which physics to model • Updated STK to latest planetary ephemeris to match JPL inputs • Final result – highly accurate STK trajectory model Range Difference Between JPL and STK Solutions • Selected Propagator: • Earth J2 with Moon + Sun 3rd bodies • Heliocentric + all 9 planets after • 9.25E+5 km from Earth Range (km) • Alternate Selection: • Earth HPOP + • Sun/moon 3rd bodies • Heliocentric + all 9 • planets after 9.25E+5 • km from Earth Days After Release Validation was essential to provide customer confidence in solution

  10. Features of the dust cover ejection model • Coordinate system selected for fixed attitude with respect to Sun • Provided fixed constraints for photometer sun-avoidance & power • STK Vector Geometry Tool validated antenna, star tracker, photometer FOV constraints • Target pointing attitude selection used to determine release attitude • Baseline DC trajectory returned towards FS several times • Oscillatory behavior • Suggested we perform optimization and sensitivity analyses VNC(Sun) = Velocity, Normal, Co-Normal, centered on Sun

  11. Analyzer Carpet Plot was generated tooptimize release directions • Appropriate Figure-of-Merit was crucial • Oscillatory behavior of DC motion required careful FoM choice • FoM chosen as minimum range after initial “drift-away” period Note: Not all options were good ones

  12. Optimum release direction • Optimal release direction maximized minimum range • But did not meet Earth and Sun constraints • Selected next best option • Nominal minimum range after drift away is 40,820 km • Desaturation impulses help • Tend to push FS away from DC over time • Attitude computation • Target Pointing attitude and custom reports used to compute VNC-Body quaternion

  13. Sensitivity analysis using Analyzer • Monte Carlo tool to investigate variations in parameters • Release angle, release velocity, and DC reflectivity • Verified large minimum range met under even 3 conditions • Reduced risk that inaccuracy in any one parameter could throw us “off the cliff”

  14. Sensitivity analysis for DC release date • Reduce impact of commissioning schedule changes • Necessary to run manually • Analyzer could not handle variations in epoch dates • Determined release date variations acceptable • Within range of dates considered Dust cover successfully released on April 8, 2009 Worst Case DC-FS range > 40,000 km

  15. STK provided key risk reduction for dust cover ejection • STK allowed efficient analyses of complex problem • Reduced cost and time to address important Mission Design concern • Ability to fine-tune trajectory estimates during independent validation with customer solutions lowered risk of errors • Cost-benefit of Analyzer was important • Significantly reduced time for optimization and Monte Carlo analyses • 3D visualization provided simple visual verification of all results • Lowered risk of violating flight rules • Easy to communicate results across program and to stakeholders

  16. Acknowledgements • AGI Tech Support • For their helpful dedication and long hours helping sort out the best way to approach the problem • Jeff Baxter • Dana Oberg • Luis Montano • Ball Aerospace colleagues • For their insightful consultation • Scott Mitchell • Adam Harvey

  17. Contact information • Chris Zeller • Senior Systems Engineer • Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. • Boulder, Colorado • czeller@ball.com • 303-939-4636 • David Acton • Senior Systems Engineer • Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. • Boulder, Colorado • dacton@ball.com • 303-939-4775

More Related