1 / 45

The Project

The Project. Status update. Francesco Forti, INFN and University, Pisa Commissione Scientifica Nazionale 1 29 Giugno 2009. Update da marzo in pillole. 24/4 - “Mini” Machine Advisory Committee 29/5 – Approvazione Direttivo INFN struttura progetto speciale

verrill
Download Presentation

The Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Project Status update Francesco Forti, INFN and University, Pisa Commissione Scientifica Nazionale 1 29 Giugno 2009

  2. Update da marzo in pillole • 24/4 - “Mini” Machine Advisory Committee • 29/5 – Approvazione Direttivo INFN struttura progetto speciale • 18/6 - Presentazione al CERN Council e approvazione dello strategy group per la Preparatory Phase • Probabile cambiamento di sito Tor Vergata  LNF. Intensa attività per l’ottimizzazione della macchina • Ottimizzazione del rivelatore in corso: Detector Geometry Working Group; Detector R&D and engineering • 14-17/4 Warwick Physics Workshop • http://agenda.infn.it/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=1118 • 16-20/6 Perugia General Workshop • http://agenda.infn.it/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=1161 F.Forti - SuperB Status

  3. Parameters R&D + Preparatory Studies Offline Computing Optics Beam Dynamics Online Computing RF/Feedback Polarization Linac Damping Rings Electronics Magnets Control System Trigger Mech. Design Power Supplies DAQ IR/Final Focus Fluid Supplies SVT Rad. Monitor Vacuum Rad. Protection DCH Lum. Monitor Transfer Lines PID Alignment EMC Diagnostics IFR Magnet Project Office Director (M.Giorgi) Oversight Board SuperB Organization Chart for TDR Phase DeputyDirector (D.Hitlin) DeputyDirector (G.Wormser) DeputyDirector (D.Leith) International Board ofRepresentatives Project Board Machine advisory committee COMP-Adv Committee DET-Adv. Committee Accelerator Consortium (J.Seeman ) Detector Collaboration (F.Forti B.Ratcliff) Computing (M.Morandin) LocalInfrastructure (S.Tomassini AcceleratorR&D, Engineering and Construction Tunnel, power,water,utilities,……… DetectorR&D, Engineering and Construction Site computing system, offline Infrastructure,Facilities, Services Computing Model MDI Perugia June 15,2009 Marcello A. Giorgi Marcello A. Giorgi 3 DetectorTechnical Board AcceleratorTechnical Board

  4. Acceleratore

  5. PARAMETERS J.Seeman @MiniMac F.Forti - SuperB Status

  6. Mini Mac report – Apr 24 Committee: Klaus Balewski (DESY), John Corlett (LBNL), Jonathan Dorfan (SLAC, Chair), Stuart Henderson (ORNL), Tom Himel (SLAC), Claudio Pellegrini (UCLA) , Daniel Schulte (CERN), Ferdi Willeke (BNL), Andy Wolski (Liverpool), Frank Zimmermann (CERN) • “The MAC now feels secure in enthusiastically encouraging the SuperB design team to proceed to the TDR phase, with confidence that the design parameters are achievable.” Recent strong progress: • Crab waist tests at DAFNE • Beam-beam measurements (DAFNE) and simulations • IR design • Lattice • Polarization spin rotators • “Nonetheless, much detailed work remains to bring the design to the level where (a) ground-breaking, (b) final engineering of accelerator components can commence.” Further needed work areas: • Emittance tuning and evaluate tolerances • Dynamic aperture calculations • IR and arc vacuum systems • Injection system • Vibration studies • Polarization lattice . F.Forti - SuperB Status

  7. SuperB rings SITES : Tor Vergata…….. F.Forti - SuperB Status

  8. LNF option F.Forti - SuperB Status

  9. The Interaction Region Design F.Forti - SuperB Status

  10. SC Quadrupoles at the IP (E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni) F.Forti - SuperB Status June 16-19, 2009 Perugia Meeting Page 10

  11. Detector Layout – Reuse parts of Babar BASELINE OPTION F.Forti - SuperB Status

  12. Detector Proto-Techboard Detector Coordinators – B.Ratcliff, F. Forti Technical Coordinator – W.Wisnieswki • SVT – G. Rizzo • DCH – G. Finocchiaro • PID – N.Arnaud, J.Va’vra • EMC – D.Hitlin  F.Porter, C.Cecchi • IFR – R.Calabrese • Magnet – W.Wisniewski • Electronics, Trigger, DAQ – D. Breton, U. Marconi • Online/DAQ – • Offline SW – • Simulation coordinator – D.Brown • Fast simulation – M. Rama • Full Simulation – F. Bianchi • Rad monitor – • Lumi monitor – • Background simulation – M.Boscolo, E.Paoloni • Machine Detector Interface – Structure inside subsystem being setup Some engineers identified F.Forti - SuperB Status

  13. Main parts of Babar to reuse Quartz bars of the DIRC Barrel EMC CsI(Tl) crystal and mechanical structure Superconducting coil and flux return yoke. Detector R&D plan for the TDR F.Forti - SuperB Status

  14. Novità sul detector SVT  - conferma accelerazione su pixel ibridi per Layer 0 DCH - finanziamento gruppi canadesi PID - Nuove possibili soluzioni PID in avanti EMC - (Presentazione estesa per sblocco cristalli ed elettronica) IFR - Risultati su non utilizzabilità fibre chiare e schermatura SiPM. ETD - Nuovo documento architetturale COMP - Utilizzo di Fastsim e Bruno e organizzazione produzioni F.Forti - SuperB Status

  15. PRE SHAPER DISC LATCH Silicon Vertex Tracker • The Babar SVT technology is adequate for R > 3cm: • use design similar to Babar SVT • Layer0 is subject to large backround and needs to be extremely thin: • More than 5MHz/cm2, 1MRad/yr, < 0.5%X0 • Striplets option: mature technology, not so robust against background. • Marginal with background rate higher than ~ 5 MHz/cm2 • Moderate R&D needed on module interconnection/mechanics/FE chip (FSSR2) • CMOS MAPS option • new & challenging technology: • can provide the required thickness • existing devices are too slow • Extensive R&D ongoing on 3-well devices 50x50um2 • Hybrid Pixel Option: tends to be too thick. • An example: Alice hybrid pixel module ~ 1% X0 • Possible material reduction with the latest technology improvements • Viable option, although marginal F.Forti - SuperB Status

  16. Marzo 2009 Attivita’ 2009 SVT Sezioni: Bologna, Milano, Pavia, Pisa, Roma III, Torino, Trieste • Attivita’ finalizzate alla stesura del TDR a fine 2010 • R&D sulle opzioni per Layer 0: • Pixel ibridi: riduzione del pitch e del materiale supporto/cooling per target Layer0-SuperB (tutte le sezioni coinvolte) • CMOS MAPS per dimostrazione fattibilita’ di modulo a pixel multichip con specifiche SuperB (tutte le sezioni coinvolte) • Continuazione attivita’ Striplets/FSSR2 (TS)(backup for Layer0) • Attivita’ su pixel ad integrazione verticale in VIPIX (CSN5) • Layer 1-5 a strip : • Design componenti moduli: sensori+fanout (TS), valutazione chip lettura (TS+PV ), “ibrido intelligente” (TS+MI) • Meccanica: • Design beam-pipe +Light support and cooling for Layer0 modules (PI), • Module design for the external Layers + Support frame & support cones (TO-MI) • Important interplay with IR design to have the Layer0 easily accessible for replacement. (with SLAC) • Off Detector electronics (MI) and DAQ Development (BO) Baseline Continue R&D F.Forti - SuperB Status

  17. Marzo 2009 Spese R&D per Layer 0 - 2009 • A Marzo presentato in CSN1 un piano spese complessivo per il 2009 considerando la nuova strategia dovuta all’accelerazione del progetto: (Pixel ibridi+MAPS) proposta: cofinanziamento attivita’ complessiva Layer0 tra fondi CSN1 - Regione Lazio - PRIN2007/Giorgi: • Attivita’ MAPS + pixel module components finanziata in CSN1: 150 kE • Fondi PRIN2007 per integrazione costi matrice MAPS: 40 kE • Fondi Regione Lazio per finanaziamento sulle attivita’ aggiuntive: 100 kE • pixel ibridi, probabile baseline per Layer0 nel TDR • ulteriori sviluppi di meccanica per il Layer0 e design beam-pipe, dovute all’accelerazione del progetto. Prin 2007/Giorgi Assegn. 2009 CSN1 Fondi Regione Lazio F.Forti - SuperB Status

  18. Dopo incontro Marzo 2009 in CSN1 • Giudicato ragionevole il nuovo piano di R&D proposto per TDR Layer0 con cofinanziamento CSN1(150kE) -Prin (40 kE) - Regione Lazio (100kEancora acquisire) • Lavoriamo con questa ipotesi • Parte dell’assegnazione di CSN1 2009 per Layer0, destinata in origine all’attivita’ MAPS-Pisa (85kE), che e’ rimandata all’inizio del 2010, viene utilizzata per pixel ibridi e su meccanica per Layer0 (60+22kE). • Il resto dell’assegnazione del 2009 nelle varie sedi viene usata sugli items Layer0 effettivamente finanziati. • Inseriamo nei preventivi INFN 2010: • items Layer0 previsti essere coperti da cofinanziamento Regione Lazio • nuovi items per altre attivita’ Layer0 • altre attivita’ SVT non legate ad R&D per Layer0. F.Forti - SuperB Status

  19. Utilizzo assegnazione 2009 MAPS-Pisa • L’assegnazione a Pisa 80+5 kE per MAPS chip+testboard (rimandata all’inizio del 2010) verra’ invece utilizzata nel 2009 per pixel ibridi e meccanica per Layer0: • Chip FE pixel ibridi (32x128 pixels, ST130nm) Sett. 2009: 40 kE • Produzione  sensori per pixel ibridi  FBK-IRST Sett. 2009: 15 kE • Chip carriers +Testboard pixel ibridi per lab test: 5 kE • Materiale e lavorazioni ulteriori prototipi mecc: 22 kE • Evoluzione supporti moduli a microcanali Layer 0 con ulteriore riduzione materiale: da 0.3% a 0.2% X0 (15 kE) • Opzioni supporto pixel ibridi per layer0+layer1 (3 kE) • End-flange Layer0 (4 kE) F.Forti - SuperB Status

  20. The drift chamber Build on BABAR drift chamber concept: no major R&D effort needed, but: LNF Canada: Carleton, McGill, UVic, UBC, TRIUMF • Lighter structure, all in Carbon Fiber (CF) • Preliminary studies show that dome-shaped CF end-plates with X0~2% seem achievable (compare 13-26% in BaBar DCH) • Design faster&lighter electronics (taking into account detectors options to be possibly installed behind backward end-plates) • To control expected increase in occupancy: • studying faster gas mixtures • considering smaller cells • alternative solutions being explored • tapered shape of end-plates F.Forti - SuperB Status

  21. DCH –ongoing work Gruppi canadesi finanziati per il 2009/2010 Studies on system design • Fast simulation studies on subsystems boundaries for design optimization – LNF • Detailed simulation of gas mixtures and cell geometry with Magboltz/Garfield/Heed – Carleton • Comparison and Preliminary overall design for drift chamber (e.g. endplate considerations, square vs. hexagonal cells, all-stereo, etc) – TRIUMF/UBC Laboratory work at LNF • Gas infrastructure completely redone • External tracker recomissioned • Test tubes inserted and working • First cosmic ray data collected (80%He-20%isob.) • Analysis ongoing Laboratory work at UVic • experimental validation of Magboltz/Garfield/Heed description of candidate gas properties (gain, drift velocity, diffusion, clustering) F.Forti - SuperB Status

  22. Particle Identification • Hadronic PID system essential for P(p,K)>0.7GeV/c (use dE/dx for p<0.7GeV/c) • Baseline is to reuse BaBar DIRC barrel-only design • Excellent performance to 4GeV/c • Robust operation • Elegant mechanical support • Photon detectors outside field region • Radiation hard fused silica radiators • Photon detector replacement • Baseline: Use pixelated fast PMTs with a smaller SOB to improve background performance by x50-100 with identical PID performance F.Forti - SuperB Status

  23. Forw/Back PID option • Extending PID coverage to the forward and backward regions has been considered • Possibly useful, although the physics case needs to be established quantitatively • Serious interference with other systems • Material in front of the EMC • Needs space • cause displacement of front face of EMC Technologies • Aerogel-based focusing RICH • Working device • Requires significant space (15 cm) and thickness (about 28%X0) • Time of flight • Need about 10ps resolution to be competitive with focusing RICH • 15-20ps already achieved. Can 10ps be achieved ? F.Forti - SuperB Status

  24. The electromagnetic calorimeter • BaBar Barrel 5760 CsI(Tl) Crystals Essential detector to measure energy and direction of g and e, discriminate between e and p, and detect neutral hadrons • Barrel • BaBar barrel crystals not suffering signs of radiation damage. They’re sufficiently fast and radiation hard for SuperB needs • They can be reused. (Would have been) most expensive detector component • Background dominated by radiative Bhabhas. IR shielding design is crucial • Endcaps • Best possible hermiticity important for key physics measurements • New forward endcap • backward endcap is an option F.Forti - SuperB Status

  25. Forward and backward EMC • Forward endcap • BaBar CsI(Tl) endcap inadequate for higher rates and radiation dose of SuperB • Need finer granularity • Faster crystals and readout electronics • comparable total X0 • Option 1: LYSO crystals • frees 10cm for a forw. PID system • radiation hard, fast, small Moliere radius, good light yield • expensive (~40$/cc) at the moment • Option 2: retain 3 outer rings of CsI(Tl), LYSO the others • less expensive • no space for forw. PID system • Backward endcap (option) • Pb plates and scintillating tiles with fiber readout to SiPMs F.Forti - SuperB Status

  26. EMC • (Vedi presentazione di Claudia) F.Forti - SuperB Status

  27. The Instrumented Flux Return • Provides discrimination between m and p±. Help detection and direction measurement of KL(together with EMC) • Composed by 1 hexagonal barrel + 2 endcaps as in BaBar • Add absorber w.r.t. BaBar to improve p/m separation. Amount and distribution to be optimized • 7-8 absorber layers • reuse of BaBar IFR iron under evaluation • Use extruded scintillator a la MINOS coupled to geiger mode APDs through WLS fibers • expected hit rates of O(100) Hz/cm2d • single layer (barrel) with other coordinate through time (1ns) • or double coord. layout (endcap) F.Forti - SuperB Status

  28. Strategia per prototipo IFR A MARZO 2009: • Necessità di poter operare anche in un ambiente ‘ostile’ come flusso di neutroni • Utilizzo di fibre chiare per allontanarsi dalla zona ‘calda’ • Aumento numero di fibre scintillanti per recuperare la luce persa • Aumento dimensione del fotorivelatore per leggere tutte le fibre di una slab di scintillatore TEST EFFETTUATI: • Test sui SiPM confermano il danno da radiazione a 109 n/cm2 • Aumento delle fibre scintillanti porta solo miglioramenti marginali • Necessità schermaggio locale dei fotorivelatori F.Forti - SuperB Status 28

  29. 1 vs 2 vs 3 kuraray fibers at the close end(CLOSE end: ~0.3m from scintillator) 1 fiber R2/1 = 1.46 R3/1 = 1.65 ADC ch With 3 fibers we gain only 13% more signal wrt 2 fiber case 2 fibers 3 fibers F.Forti - SuperB Status

  30. If preliminary results will be confirmed SiPM can be damaged with a dose of 109 n/cm2 Need for accelerator background simulations + study on neutron shielding F.Forti - SuperB Status

  31. ETD architecture proposal F.Forti - SuperB Status

  32. ETD Status • Main issue is the high speed links: • Difficult to get fixed link latency and jitter • There already is a solution for a fully FPGA-based link => OK for the off-detector links • Jitter measurements are at the level of 20ps rms. • R&D work has to start on the detector side to find a solution for the radiation area • Alberto Aloisio (INFN Napoli) has been given the charge of managing these activities. • Readout module • Based on the experience from AGATA experiment, a tentative proposal for the design of the ROM exists • Padova and Bologna are interested in this design. • ECS link to the detector • The SPECS bus, designed for LHCb, has been presented. • Interest in LAL • LAL could also take care of the FTCS system. • Activities linked to L1 trigger are still uncovered. F.Forti - SuperB Status

  33. Detector decisions • Major “Global Geometry” decisions • (Change design of flux return ?) • Forward PID: if and what technology ? • Backward EMC • Less major “Geometry” decisions • SVT Layer 0 radius and internal geometry • DCH shape • Transition radius between SVT and DCH • PID readout technology (and size) • Forward EMC geometry • IFR absorber distribution • Guidance from physics • Detector Geometry Working Group setup • Chaired by Matteo Rama (LNF) and Achille Stocchi (LAL) F.Forti - SuperB Status

  34. Computing • FastSim: used for physics studies F.Forti - SuperB Status

  35. FullSim (Bruno) • Geant4 simulation with full detector geometry EMC Barrel-endcap transition region F.Forti - SuperB Status

  36. Computing production • SuperB software is grid enabled • Necessary Babar packages have been extracted and made independent of Babar environment • Created superbvo.org, distributed in INFNGRID • All sites can enable this VO • At CNAF the setup is complete • Started collaboration with LHC groups to benefit from their experience web.infn.it/esc09 F.Forti - SuperB Status

  37. People

  38. WBS for TDR • Developed Work Breakdown Structure for TDR preparation F.Forti - SuperB Status

  39. Developed a hiring plan • Most urgent positions to be filled identified • Although more will be needed as plan develops • Funding through region Lazio TDR funds and/or co-funding from other agencies • Total of 19 positions (phys+engineers) • Different priorities being assessed F.Forti - SuperB Status

  40. Richieste 2009 • Necessità urgenti: • Costruzione modulo EMC per Beam Test • (Vedi presentazione di Cecchi): 49k€ • Rabbocco missioni interne • (già discusse a marzo): 37 k€ • Totale: 86 k€ • I SJ disponibili sono: • Consumi 59k€ su SuperB Perugia • Consumi 25k€ su Babar Ferrara, • non serviranno, mentre servirà tutto il SJ di M.E. su Babar, per il quale chiederemo lo sblocco a settembre • Totale: 84k€ • Si richiede quindi una assegnazione aggiuntiva di 2k€ F.Forti - SuperB Status

  41. Approval and funding • INFN has a good relations with Regional Lazio Government and the Italian National government. • The President of INFN is confident that a clear answer about approval of SuperB and will come before the end of this year. • Meanwhile , as announced in Orsay, INFN intends to start MOU’s with labs and agencies to officially support the project and the TDR phase. F.Forti - SuperB Status

  42. A.Masiero: “Flavor and New Physics: Frustration and Hope” F.Forti - SuperB Status

  43. F.Forti - SuperB Status

  44. BACKUP F.Forti - SuperB Status

  45. Super KEKB F.Forti - SuperB Status

More Related