1 / 37

Sustainable energy options for low-income households – South Africa

Sustainable energy options for low-income households – South Africa . Sustainable Energy Africa Yachika Reddy 26 May 2009. Presentation outline. Overview of low-income housing sector in South Africa - ACCESS Sustainable energy TECHNOLOGY for low-income households FINANCE Policy

vinny
Download Presentation

Sustainable energy options for low-income households – South Africa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sustainable energy options for low-income households – South Africa Sustainable Energy Africa Yachika Reddy 26 May 2009

  2. Presentation outline • Overview of low-income housing sector in South Africa - ACCESS • Sustainable energy TECHNOLOGY for low-income households • FINANCE • Policy • Solutions • Conclusions

  3. Overview • Electrification • 80% in urban areas (excludes informal settlements without tenure) • 46% in rural areas • National level of electrification is ~ 74% • Low-income housing – formal vs informal • Focus on formal electrified households CURRENTLY: • Approx 23% of SA’s total population reside in informal settlements = ~2.4 million HHs, ~10 million people • Housing backlog = ~2,4 million • Electrification backlog = ~2.4 million • 2.3 million houses delivered since 1994 • Range of electrification levels • In poor rural towns as much as 60% unelectrified hhs– King Sabata Dalindyebo – while CoCT 2% unelec hhs

  4. Overview contd • Range of fuels used by electrified low-income households • Energy poverty persists for many urban dwellers despite electrification • Affordability of energy services remains a key concern • Fuel use in poor households poses dangers in the form of fires, burns and poisonings • Energy poverty needs to be addressed in addition to fuel subsidies • through broad energy services programmes, including thermally efficient housing, SWH etc • Cities of the South ‘half-formed’ – how we build houses huge impact on the urban form and development

  5. South African metro electricity consumption by sector

  6. Technology • Efficient building design • Solar water heaters • Efficient lighting

  7. Energy assessment matrix for low-income housing

  8. Efficient building design • Large gains can be made by applying simple, cheap (often no-cost) principles to developments and building design, for example: • Structure orientation • Adequate roof overhang & window position • Ceiling and/or insulation use • Often most effective intervention

  9. Fitting ceilings in low-income houses • Majority of the low-cost houses built by government do not have ceilings fitted – thermally inefficient • Large amounts of additional energy needed to heat these houses • Installing a ceiling has numerous essential benefits: • Less money spent on heating in poor hhs ( hhs spend up to 66% of their income) • Improved indoor air quality (where paraffin stoves, coal and firewood are used for heating) • Improved health of the hh (reduction in indoor air pollution and incidence of respiratory diseases, burns and fires) – good for the city economy and fewer working days lost through illness

  10. Paraffin – the dominant fuel in poor households • Approximately 40% of South Africans (20 million) use paraffin their household cooking, lighting and and heating energy needs daily • Approx 40 000 households affected by runaway fires in informal settlements annually • Fatalities and burns – burns the leading cause of death among young children • Approximately 80 000 children are poisoned from accidently drinking paraffin annually • Paraffin related incidents cost the economy R104 billion annually

  11. Efficient Building Design • Benefits proven • Financially very viable • Knowledge and experience exists • Several existing buildings in cities • So why not happening?

  12. Solar water heaters (SWHs) for low-income households • In the past difficult to argue for installation of SWHs in low-income hhs • Increasingly evident that SWHs adoption in this sector from an economic and social welfare view is beneficial and viable when considering the following factors and external costs: • Negative safety and health impacts and costs of water heating using dangerous and dirty fuels • As this sector develops, many will install electric geysers for hot water – suppressed demand • Potential for peak load reduction • Opportunity cost of time • An Eskom subsidy is expected to improve affordability significantly

  13. The Facts about LI SWHs…… • Growth in SWH industry will create jobs • Many SA Cities have SWH targets as critical elements of their Energy Strategies • LI SWHs are making financial sense if tackled correctly

  14. The case for Solar Water Heaters… • Technology well established • Financially sensible • Supports job creation So why no mass implementation?

  15. LI SWHs • Recent approaches to low pressure SWH system implementation in LI hhs – Kuyasa Khayelitsha - are making the financial case for this sector. • Low unit prices are key to this financial case which is becoming a reality through: • Bulk purchase discounts: installed costs of R3800-R4500 are possible for low pressure systems • Eskom incentive • Carbon funding through CDM ‘suppressed demand’ methodology

  16. Water use in LI Households: Kuyasa survey • Corbera, E., Wlokas, H., Wesselink, C., in preparation. Sustainable housing and poverty alleviation through the Clean Development Mechanism. Tyndall Centre Working Paper. • Ave 12l/day = R21 pm

  17. Combined operating and capital costs: Low income • SWH repayment – (R4500 @ R75pm over 10 years – prime interest) • 12l hot water/day against 100l hot water/day

  18. Combined operating and capital costs: Low income • SWH repayment – (R23pm over 10 years – 8%interest) • 12l hot water/day against 100l

  19. Business model basics • CDM ‘suppressed demand’ methodology • Eskom incentive • Local employment • Low monthly repayment (approx R20) • Prepaid meter collection system/FBE

  20. The table below provides an indicative quantitative financial analysis Business Model

  21. Efficient lighting Use of compact fluorescent light bulbs - 80% more efficient Improved quality through reduction in electricity costs for LI hh where proportion of energy costs to income is very high

  22. Efficient lighting • Technically well established • Up to 80% saving on electric lighting costs • Financial case clear

  23. Finance • Efficient housing design • In practice with formal LI housing – rapidly forming informal dwelling sector • Service delivery focussed on only a single structure - 20 Amp electrical supply connection so when appliances added on from the second dwelling system collapses. Are we then not short-sighted in the amount of electricity supply to LI households? • Free Basic Electricity- far greater cross subsidisation needed – big users should pay far more to enable access of energy services to the low income sector – currently not redistributive enough • National Sustainable Housing Facility - set up to facilitate flow of carbon funds from the North to enable sustainable housing in the South • Slow process • Does not cover mobility issues – planning dimensions – housing on the margin therefore cannot afford transport , so need more money to live closer to the city • top up needed to ensure type of land acquired

  24. Policy • Substantial policy gap • FBE – but limited to only 50 units • A large number of SWH programmes : Kuyasa, NMBM and Cosmo projects • not yet in policy therefore not a mass roll out • Big move to get efficient water heating to households • Only actual policy in existence supporting EE building design in LI housing is the Southern Coastal Condensation Problem (SCCP) area • NDoH Environmental Sound Low Cost Housing Framework • But not taken to a policy level

  25. Policy • Access • when City of Tshwane increased their FBE delivery to 100kW units then non –technical losses reduced significantly • Tshwane shrunk the customer base so this intervention did not cost more but the theft decreased due to meeting needs • Overall – there are still pilot projects due to absence of policy – pilots working well • Trying out interventions on a bigger scale but not replicable • SCCP policy – successful in itself • Reflects once it happens it becomes the norm • Need to move from projects to policy

  26. Solutions • Policy • Ceilings • FBE – amount and accounting for double dwellings • Infrastructure – balancing the need for energy access to be functional and in tune with the way in which cities are developing • Department of Public Works - Working for Energy Programme • Opportunity – retrofitting of ceilings in existing low-income households – job creation • Programmatic CDM – ceilings • accessing carbon funds from the north to support roll out of ceilings in social housing nationally • Sustainable energy options for low income housing - national priority - should be funded through a stepped tariff - should be paying for a national programme vs paying for supply

  27. Conclusions • Informality - an enormous issue • Long-term feature of the national landscape • Not a temporary phenomenon that will be addressed with the National Housing programme – currently significant housing and electrification backlogs • Sector is growing • Meeting basic energy needs and developing human potential is hampered for those living in this sector. • Huge challenge in funding sustainable energy options for informal settlements

  28. Thank youFor more information:Sustainable Energy Africa www.sustainable.org.zainfo@sustainable.org.za+27 21 702-3622

  29. Background • High Pressure SWH vs Low Pressure SWH • Materials used • Cost differences • Availability • Pressure issues (mixing)

  30. Typical Low Pressure System

  31. Typical High pressure system

  32. Materials • High pressure • copper/stainless steel tanks, • often indirect systems – copper in tubes • Need to withstand high pressure • High pressure valves • Low pressure • No copper • Need to withstand pressure of water weight – cheaper materials (fibreglass, polycarbonate, stainless steel), no expensive valves

  33. Cost Differences • Low pressure SWH typically R3000-R5000 installed for 100-110l • High pressure typically R14000 installed for 150l, 50% reduction possible

  34. Supply + Installation • Imports from China • Local manufacturers • Training not lengthy – can provide jobs in low income areas

  35. Low Pressure SWH Pros and Cons Pros • Low cost • Additional Eskom SWH incentive available • Low maintenance • Undesirable scrap materials Cons • Mixing problems • Overflow (up to 4l/day) • Clarity on health issues – is SWH water safe for consumption?

  36. Maintenance • Low maintenance • No expensive high pressure valves, ball valve at inlet only • Tube breakages – easy to replace although water loss inevitable • Most systems come with 5 year factory warranty

  37. The Facts about LI SWHs…… • Growth in SWH industry will create jobs • Many SA Cities have SWH targets as critical elements of their Energy Strategies • LI SWHs are making financial sense if tackled correctly

More Related