1 / 9

Apology, Acknowledgment, Contrition, Reparation

Apology, Acknowledgment, Contrition, Reparation. Dynamics of Reconciliation – Week 11 Dr. David Tombs. Questions for reflection. When might ‘apology’ be an appropriate and/or effective part of reconciliation? What makes an apology sincere and helpful?. Typology of apologies.

von
Download Presentation

Apology, Acknowledgment, Contrition, Reparation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Apology, Acknowledgment, Contrition, Reparation Dynamics of Reconciliation – Week 11 Dr. David Tombs

  2. Questions for reflection • When might ‘apology’ be an appropriate and/or effective part of reconciliation? • What makes an apology sincere and helpful?

  3. Typology of apologies • Private and/or public • Unilateral/bilateral/multi-lateral • Individual and/or collective [organisational; institutional; societal] • Explicit and/or implicit • Apologies that are linked to reparations or self-standing

  4. The Meanings of Apology Govier and Verwoerd distinguish between: • A defence • An excuse • A moral apology Trudy Govier and Wilhelm J. Verwoerd, ‘The Promise and Pitfalls of Apologies’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(1), (2002), pp.67-82 [67].

  5. Apology and Acknowledgment Acknowledgment is a crucial aspect of apology but what is acknowledged can vary. It might be: • Acknowledgment of a wrong done – this includes both that the deed was done, that it should not have been done, and that the victim was wrongly treated • Acknowledgment of responsibility for wrong doing

  6. Apology, Responsibility and Sincerity Acknowledgment of a wrong-done is necessary but not sufficient for moral responsibility. Acknowledgment of moral responsibility for wrong doing (not just the fact of a wrong done) is often critical to whether the apology is helpful or not, and whether it is received as sincere or as an evasion.

  7. Apologies and Reparations An apology can also be undermined by its relationship to reparations. • If reparations are refused it can suggest that the apology is insincere and/or that there is only a token concern for practical justice not a real concern • If reparations are seen as an alternative to sincere acknowledgment of responsibility it can be equally harmful.

  8. Apologies and Contrition • The value of acknowledgment be undermined if there is no sign of contrition, ie a sense of regret, which might express a sense of responsibility and/or guilt and/or shame.

  9. Apology and Reconciliation At its best, a sincere apology can make one of the most profound contributions possible to a reconciliation process. At its worst, an insincere apology can make one of the most damaging contributions imaginable.

More Related