1 / 13

Modified Design of Aries T-Tube Divertor Concept

This study explores a modified design for the Aries T-Tube Divertor concept, comparing its thermal and mechanical properties with the original design. The results show improved temperature distribution and slightly lower maximum velocity. Future work includes analyzing transient thermal loading and performing joint analysis.

wblair
Download Presentation

Modified Design of Aries T-Tube Divertor Concept

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modified Design of Aries T-Tube Divertor Concept Jeremy Burke ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting May 19, 2010

  2. Original AREIES-AT T-Tube Design • 5 mm thick W armor • W alloy outer tube and inner cartridge • 15 mm diameter 100 mm long • Divertor would use ~110,000 units • He at 600 °C and 10 MPa • Transition zone going from W alloy tube to the steel channel • It is expected that the T-Tube divertor concept will be able to handle a 10MW/m2 heat flux.

  3. Original T-Tube Thermo-Fluid Results • Thermal loads are calculated with a 10 MW/m2 heat flux on the plasma surface of the W armor, and a volumetric heat generation of 17.5 MW/m3 • Max jet velocity = 230 m/s • Coolant pressure drop = ~0.12 MPa • PPumping/Pthermal = ~5.7% (would like to keep this under 10%) • Max coolant temp = 1180 °C

  4. Original Design Armor Temperature Distribution ΔT on plasma face = 225 °C

  5. Original T-Tube Thermo-Mechanical Results • Temperature dependent material properties were attained from the ITER Material Properties Handbook • Max armor temperature = 1809 °C • Max tube temperature = 1268 °C (re-crystallization limit ~1300 °C ) • Max thermal and primary stresses = 342 MPa (3Sm limit = 450 MPa)

  6. Original T-Tube Concept for ARIES-AT VS New Tapered Design • Subject to the same thermal loads and mass flow rate • Original cartridge - 10 mm diameter • New cartridge tapers from 10 mm to 2.5 mm at the ends • Armor Surface Heat Flux - 10 MW/m3 • Volumetric Heat Generation - 17.5 MW/m3 • He Mass Flow Rate - 8.45 g/s

  7. New Thermo-Fluid Results • Thermal loads are calculated with a 10 MW/m2 heat flux on the plasma surface of the W armor, and a volumetric heat generation of 17.5 MW/m3 • Max jet velocity = 220 m/s • Coolant pressure drop = ~0.105 MPa • PPumping/Pthermal = ~5.7% (would like to keep this under 10%) • Max coolant temperature = 1161 °C

  8. New Design Armor Temperature Distribution • ΔT on plasma face = 200 °C

  9. New Thermo-Mechanical Results • The same ANSYS Structural setup was used • Max armor temperature = 1791 °C • Max tube temperature = 1246 °C (re-crystallization limit ~1300 °C ) • Max thermal and primary stresses = 368 MPa (3Sm limit = 450 MPa)

  10. Results Comparison Tapered Design • Max Velocity – 220 m/s • Pressure Drop – 0.102 MPa • Max Coolant Temp – 1161 °C • Max Armor Temp – 1791 °C • Max Tube Temp – 1246 °C • Max Stress - 368 MPa • Plasma face ΔT = 200 °C • Original Design • Max Velocity – 230 m/s • Pressure Drop – 0.125 MPa • Max Coolant Temp – 1180°C • Max Armor Temp – 1809 °C • Max Tube Temp – 1263 °C • Max Stress – 342 MPa • Plasma face ΔT = 225 °C

  11. Velocity Profile and Temperature Comparison • New T-Tube has slightly lower max temperature with a more even distribution. • New T-Tube has lower max velocity but the velocity at the end is higher, thus the more even temperature distribution

  12. Future Work • To date only steady state thermal analysis has been done • Decision must be made on future analysis • Transient thermal loading can be analyzed • Plastic deformation analysis can be performed to determine if the design can be pushed passed the 3Sm limit and potentially go beyond a 10 MW/m2

  13. W to Steel Joint Analysis • Graded transition from W alloy to steel manifold • Analysis still needs to be performed

More Related