1 / 20

Inclusive higher education: the perspective of professors. A qualitative survey .

Inclusive higher education: the perspective of professors. A qualitative survey . Sophie Jackmaert Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Nathalie Heurckmans Steunpunt Inclusief Hoger Onderwijs (SIHO), Belgium. 6 July 2011. SIHO. 'Support Centre for Inclusive Higher Education'

wbrown
Download Presentation

Inclusive higher education: the perspective of professors. A qualitative survey .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inclusive higher education: the perspective of professors. A qualitativesurvey. Sophie Jackmaert Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Nathalie Heurckmans Steunpunt Inclusief Hoger Onderwijs (SIHO), Belgium 6 July 2011

  2. SIHO 'Support Centre for Inclusive Higher Education' Supports institutions for higher education: • in order to realize inclusive higher education • to create equal chances and full participation for students with disabilities

  3. SIHO 3 main tasks: • Provision of services to higher education institutions (consultancy, training, ...) • Networking with (inter)national partners in the field of disability studies (which involves several disciplines) • Research

  4. The perspective of professors • Insider perspective Good practices Input for further realization of inclusive higher education ‘How do professors experience inclusive higher education?’ • 12 professors in the Flemish higher education system • Semi-structured interviews

  5. Insider perspective professors 4 main themes: • Experiences with students with a disability • Influences on their competences as a professor • Knowledge and experience with disability policy and services • Attitude towards (aspects of) inclusion in higher education

  6. Conclusions • Broad definition • Diversity • Students with disabilities • Open for inclusion and positive attitudes towards students with disabilities

  7. “I find it crucial that a student gets all the opportunities that he or she needs.” “I find it important to consider the differences between people.”

  8. Conclusions • But what with more severe disabilities? • No advantage to other students • Not ‘pampering’

  9. Experiences • Motivated students • Positive • Open communication • Positive experience • The challenge of trying to adapt the way of teaching and the course content to the needs of the students

  10. Experiences • Difficult experiences • Psychiatric disabilities • Students who stop their education before graduating (‘the support couldn’t meet the needs anymore’)

  11. Experiences • Some of the professors find it difficult to pay attention to students with disabilities in their lessons because of the large groups of students  Some disabilities are only apparent during tasks, exams , …

  12. Aspects of influence • Another function beside teaching • Education • Previous work • Child with disability • Their character, attitude as a person

  13. Reasonable accommodations • Willing to make accommodations (also for everyone, UDL) • ‘Little effort’, ‘evident’, ‘part of being a teacher’, ‘can be an extra effort but it is essential’, “We have a policy towards it so it is more then logical that we support these students.”

  14. Reasonable accommodations • Sometimes the support is only needed during the exams • More difficult for psychiatric disabilities and less notable disabilities

  15. Professors own support • Reflecting with colleges • Study days “It helps me that I can reflect with my colleagues. ‘What kind of support did they offer?’, ‘Did it work?’ ‘What are their experiences?’,…”

  16. Influence on competencies • Reflecting on pedagogy • More aware of their lesson “It makes me search for different ways of didactic teaching.” “It makes me reflecting about the way I teach.”

  17. Influence on person and attitude “What I personally find enriching is that I always experience, at the end of the road, that those students aren’t any different. I see them more and more as a student and not as a person with a disability. That is an enrichment in itself, because it often opens a lot of possibilities.”

  18. Policy • Positive • Communication and information concerning reasonable accommodations • But services are still very recent (sometimes ‘just in time’ info)

  19. Needs • Debate/discussion competencies • More than just ‘practical information’ • Feedback, info concerning disabilities • Study days, use of cases, testimonies of students who graduated

  20. SIHO: contact SIHO SintJorisstraat 71 8000 Brugge info@siho.be www.siho.be

More Related