1 / 16

Towards a New EU-Russia Agreement: Key Challenges

Towards a New EU-Russia Agreement: Key Challenges. Sergey Afontsev Institute for World Economy and International Relations EU-Russia Industrialists Round Table. Vienna Process, 6 th Meeting Vienna, February 27, 2013. 1. CU/CES Project. 2. 3. Presentation Structure.

whitney
Download Presentation

Towards a New EU-Russia Agreement: Key Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards a NewEU-Russia Agreement:Key Challenges Sergey Afontsev Institute for World Economy and International Relations EU-Russia Industrialists Round Table Vienna Process, 6th Meeting Vienna, February 27, 2013

  2. 1. CU/CES Project 2. 3. Presentation Structure Russia’s WTO Accession Business Perspective

  3. WTO Accession: What About Exports?

  4. WTO Accession: What About Imports? Just to compare: Ruble appreciation in 2011 was roughly equivalent to a once-for-all drop in import duties by 4.7 percentage points.

  5. WTO Accession: What About Output? CEFIR-TML-ZEW study using SUST-RUS computable general equilibrium model (2011): Industry Effects

  6. WTO Accession: Political Implications • Substitution of tariff barriers with ‘compensatory measures’ (‘utilization fee’ on cars, bans on meat imports, etc.) to protect specific industries. • Despite moderate economic implications of the WTO accession, politicians insist on temporary moratorium on ‘WTO+’ deals. • Strong opposition to services liberalization (esp. financial services).

  7. Key Integration Projects in the CIS Area • Deep Integration: Customs Union / Common Economic Space (CU/CES). Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, anybody else? • Preferential Trade Arrangements: CIS Free Trade Agreement (CIS FTA). Signed by Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Armenia, and Moldova on October 18, 2011 (fuels & energy and metals are exempted). Operative since September 20, 2012 (Kazakhstan and Moldova fully join in December 2012, Tajikistan still pending).

  8. CU/CES Project:Whither Economic Rationale? CU/CES Trade Structure, 2011 (per cent)

  9. CU/CES Project:Whither Enlargement? Economic consequences of Ukraine’s accession, ‘optimistic estimate’ (Institute for Economic Forecasting, 2012).

  10. Potential Integration Partners Kyrgyzstan • Potential (but problematic) CU/CES candidate. • The only WTO member in the region with 5.1 per cent weighted tariff rate in 2011 (as compared with Russia’s 10.3 per cent before and 7.1 per cent after the WTO accession). • Highly fragile political system with a nomadic-cycle April peak of political protest. • Drug production (esp. in Fergana valley) and trafficking.

  11. Potential Integration Partners Tajikistan • Potential (but highly problematic) CU/CES candidate with a tiny contribution to total CU/CES trade. • Highly fragile political system with civil war memories and risks of terrorist infiltration from Afghanistan . • Drug production and trafficking.

  12. CU/CES Project: Political Implications • Despite dubious economic and political prospects, creation of Eurasian Economic Union is scheduled for January 2015. • Russia-EU FTA is postponed for indefinite future. • Kazakhstan’s WTO accession can change a lot (with much political struggle expected), but Belarus under Lukashenko is a political invariant poisoning prospects for EU-CU/CES cooperation.

  13. Business Perspective on the NewEU-Russia Agreement • Not the form (‘Basic Agreement’ or ‘Comprehensive Agreement’) but timing matters. • The New Agreement should target bilateral issues and rely on ‘Russia first’ principle in dealing with issues delegated to the CU/CES level. • Problem- and field-oriented agreements should be signed wherever/whenever possible. • Interest-based approach should dominate value-based one (business needs rules and projects, not disputes over gay/lesbian rights).

  14. EU-Russia Industrialists’ Roundtable: Toward a Common Technology Market • Development of a unified legal framework for commercialization of innovations (including simplification of the cooperation regime in dual-use technologies) • Accelerated convergence of technical standards and regulations, with the special emphasis on high-tech products and markets • Strengthening property rights protection and the convergence of the respective legal norms used in Russia and the EU • Exempting cross-border trade operations with goods under technology transfer projects from customs duties, and improving custom clearance procedures • Promoting joint R&D projects, including those implemented by Russian and European companies in cooperation with scientific and educational institutions.

  15. EU-Russia Industrialists’ Roundtable: Toward a Common Technology Market Given the fact that the leadership of both Russia and the EU prioritize the development of high-tech industries, technological cooperation is the most promising area where regulatory rules can be successfully harmonized during the next few years. Negotiations on Common EU-Russia Technology Market can work as a success story paving way for broader regulatory cooperation to move from field-oriented (sectoral) agreements to the New EU-Russia Agreement.

  16. Thank you for your attention!

More Related