1 / 7

A BRIEF GUIDE ON HOW TO MAKE YOUR THESIS CREDIBLE

To achieve your objective of improving the logic of your scientific research, we come up with a unique recipe for "claims analysis."

Download Presentation

A BRIEF GUIDE ON HOW TO MAKE YOUR THESIS CREDIBLE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Brief Guide on How to Make Your Thesis Credible

  2. Key Points • Sample Size-The Bigger, The Better • Appropriate Measurement Tools • Statistical Outliers • Bias In Research

  3. Introduction To achieve your objective of improving the logic of your scientific research, we come up with a unique recipe for "claims analysis." At the point when I say "claim analysis," I mean inspection of both negative and positive results of your thesis design feature. Think for a minute how does science work? Trials, perceptions? Yes, you made the right guess. However, above all, researchers gather information and break it down. As it's been said, "In God we trust, all others bring data." So when logical end made on precise information, the cases would be more dependable than cases made by any other individual. The criteria for deciding these cases is given in this guide. How about we see these?

  4. Sample Size-The Bigger, The Better Maybe a couple of us read research reports to evaluate the approach. The outcomes of any research are the fundamental fascination, the explanation behind perusing any study. Whereas the fact is researchers spend most of their time in planning how the study will be carried out. Don't you want to approximate the population closely? I know the answer is yes. Any decent researcher will tell you; study outcomes are just on a par with its structure. Sample size and power are critical components of study design. So broadening the range of possible data is the perfect solution to it. Let's confuse the issue further. Various subjects contain distinctive thought of what comprises a decent sample size. It's anything but not a simple issue. Thus I'm recommending a writer facility for beginners that is “best dissertation writing services."

  5. Appropriate Measurement Tools For any research query, the measurement framework should be assessed systematically and cautiously. It includes survey questions, interview questions, operationalization, and conceptualization of your study. If the rationale behind the measure is wholly clarified, there ought to be no issue. In any case, your study plan and estimations will confront the investigation. Therefore, pick your words cautiously while referencing your investigation measures; for example, "I have received these measures from X, Y, Z study." Reviewers consistently search for these sorts of words. It essentially gives them a signal that you conduct the research process rigorously.

  6. Statistical Outliers Outliers- drop or not to drop? Outliers- a major statistical issue, but usually, people aren't sure how to deal with it. Most parametric statistics are highly sensitive to outliers, and it can chaos up your analysis. In spite of all this, as much as you'd like to, it is not adequate to exclude an observation just because it is an outlier. It's crucial to investigate the nature of the outlier before deciding. Investigate these outliers with visualizing tools such as box plot, scatter plot, and Z-score. A good tip is to study whether there exists any pattern or systematic relationship to the outliers.

  7. Bias In Research It is worth bringing up that every study has its puzzling factors and limitations. The baffling effect cannot be completely avoided. Either deliberate or accidental, bias is bias. For the most part, it's the latter. There exists a wide range of bias i.e., inclusive bias, procedural bias, and measurement bias. Among these, the "omission bias is the most common. It occurs when samples are chosen for convenience. Every student should, therefore, be aware of every single potential wellspring of bias and undertake every possible action to decrease and limit the deviation from reality. But if a limitation is still there, you should confess it by declaring the known limitations of your work. All through this guide, we saw what comprise a decent claim. I have mentioned strategies against which you can analyze your study claims — anyway, an explanation regarding instrument measures left to be explained. I will come back to that question again at some point. I hope this guide helped you in realizing the study claims.

More Related