1 / 23

PSY402 Theories of Learning

This chapter explores the theory of learned helplessness and its connection to depression. It examines studies conducted on animals and humans, characteristics of helplessness, criticisms of the theory, attribution theory, different types of helplessness, severity of depression, hopelessness depression, pessimism and optimism, learned hopefulness, and biological changes associated with repeated exposure to uncontrollable stress.

wilburlopez
Download Presentation

PSY402 Theories of Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PSY402Theories of Learning Chapter 11 – Cognitive Control of Behavior (Cont.)

  2. Learned Helplessness

  3. Learned Helplessness Theory • Seligman – depression is learned. • Depression occurs when people believe: • Failures are due to uncontrollable events. • Failure will continue as long as events are beyond their control. • Depression arises from helplessness.

  4. Animal Research • Step 1 -- three groups of dogs: • Inescapable shock – no control. • Escapable shock -- terminated if the dog pressed a panel. • No shock • Step 2 – 10 trials of signaled avoidance training in shuttle box. • 2/3 of inescapable shock dogs did not learn to jump during step 2.

  5. Step 1 Step 2

  6. Dogs Fail to Escape

  7. Helplessness in Humans • Hiroto – three groups of college students: • Uncontrollable group – wrongly told that pushing button would end noise. • Escapable group – pushing button ended noise. • Control – no noise. • Tested using finger shuttle box. • Uncontrollable group did not escape

  8. Human Results Mimic Depression Depressed (no noise) and Inescapable Noise conditions Non-Depressed Escapable Noise and no noise conditions

  9. Characteristics of Helplessness • Motivational impairment – unable to initiate voluntary behavior. • Mice in water maze. • Nonspecific – carries over to a variety tasks and test situations. • Intellectual impairment – incapable of benefiting from future experience – even if they jump, don’t learn. • Emotional trauma – negative affect.

  10. Studies of Depressives • Show similar results to learned helplessness studies. • Depressed individuals do not escape noise, responding like inescapable non-depressed individuals. • Depressed individuals do not adjust likelihood of succeeding upward when they experience success. • They credit chance not skill.

  11. Criticisms of Seligman’s Theory • There is more to depression than learned helplessness. • Helplessness subjects described the task as a skill task, even though acting as if it were a chance task. • Failure to replicate performance deficits in humans – facilitation of performance instead. • Results may be due to personal attributions.

  12. Attribution Theory • Attribution = the perceived cause of an event. • Causal attributions of failure have three dimensions: • Internal-external– internal traits or characteristics vs environmental forces • Stable-unstable – past causes will persist vs new forces will determine future outcomes • Global-specific– outcome relates only to one task vs outcome effects everything.

  13. Attributional Model of Depression

  14. Two Kinds of Helplessness • Personal helplessness – an individual’s inability causes failure. • Universal helplessness – the environment is structured so that no one can control future events. • Abramson -- both kinds lead to depression. • Vary on external-internal dimension. • Low self-esteem only with personal.

  15. Severity of Depression • Depression can be transient if attributed to global but changing conditions. • Severe depression occurs when attributions are: • Internal • Global • Stable • Better if external, specific, unstable.

  16. Hopelessness Depression • Hopelessness– the expectation that desired outcomes will not occur. • Learned helplessness -- no control over undesired outcomes. • Accounts for anxiety without depression. • Anxiety – possibility that a person may have no control over negative events. • Depression occurs when certain.

  17. Pessimism and Optimism • Langer suggests perceived control is basic to human functioning – mastery, competence. • Negative explanatory style – hopeless style predicts susceptibility to depression. • Positive explanatory style – optimists are hopeful, feel they can control events, tend to be more successful, more healthy. • They are not depressed when life goes wrong.

  18. Learned Hopefulness • Seligman believes a more positive attributional style can be taught. • Enhancing positive attributional style in depressed patients decreased their symptoms. • Changing the attributional style of college students via a workshop & ongoing coaching prevented development of depression.

  19. Biological Changes • Weiss has suggested that repeated exposure to uncontrollable stress causes biochemical changes in people and animals. • Rats showed decreased feeding & sex drive, less grooming, lack of voluntary response, early morning wakefulness – signs of depression. • Related to increased activity in locus coeruleus and increased glutamate – similar to depressed individuals.

  20. Cognitive View of Phobia • Bandura– two kinds of expectancy maintain a phobia: • Stimulus-outcome expectancy – about the nature of the stimulus. A statistics class will be aversive. • Response-outcome expectancy – about the likely result of behavior. I cannot pass the statistics class. • Why does phobia lead to avoidance behavior with negative outcomes? • Self-efficacy expectancy – belief that one can or (with phobia) cannot execute a particular action.

  21. Self-Efficacy Expectations • Types of information used to establish self-efficacy expectations: • Personal accomplishments, success. • Task difficulty, amount of effort. • Observations of success/failure of others – vicarious modeling. • Emotional arousal – we feel less able to cope when agitated or tense. • High self-efficacy predicts approach behavior.

  22. Criticisms of Efficacy View • Efficacy expectations may be epiphenomenal (not causal) – they may arise with anxiety but have no effect on responding. • Three types of anxiety: • Cognitive – affects self-efficacy • Physiological – affects physiology • Behavioral – directly influences responding. • Lang – contribution of each depends on prior experience and the situation.

  23. Remainder of Chapter • Concepts and comparison of human and animal learning are part of PSY 334. • This material will not be on the final exam.

More Related