1 / 15

Spreading-Activation Theory

Spreading-Activation Theory. Quillian (1962, 1967) proposed a spreading-activation theory of human semantic processing memory search as activation spreading from two or more concept nodes in a semantic network until an intersection was found

willem
Download Presentation

Spreading-Activation Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spreading-Activation Theory • Quillian (1962, 1967) proposed a spreading-activation theory of human semantic processing • memory search as activation spreading from two or more concept nodesin a semantic network until an intersection was found • Priming in semantic memory – spreading activation from the node of the primed concept • QUILLIAN’S THEORY OF SEMANTIC MEMORY • conceptscorrespond to particular senses of words or phrases • aconcept as a node in a network, with properties of the concept represented as labeled relational links to other concept nodes

  2. Spreading-Activation Theory • Links are pointers, usually go in both directions between two concepts • Links can have different criterialities, which are numbers indicating how essential each link is to the meaning of the concept • The full meaning of any concept is the whole network as entered from the concept node • The search in memory between concepts involves tracing out in parallel along the links from the node of each concept specified by the input words • at each node reached, an activation tag is left that specifies the starting node and the immediate predecessor

  3. Spreading-Activation Theory • Common Misinterpretations of Quillian’ Theory • The idea of cognitive economy (Anderson & Bower, 1973; Conrad, 1972) • Strong theory of cognitive economy (Conrad, 1972) • All properties are stored only once in memory and must be retrieved through a series of inferences for all words except those that they most directly define • Requires erasing info whenever it applies at a more general level • Weal theory of cognitive economy • People surely store certain properties at more than one level in the hierarchy

  4. Spreading-Activation Theory • Quillian’s theory that all links are equal • Links were assumed t have differential accessibilities (criteriality) • Rips et al. (1973) – intermediate nodes are necessary for a network model to explain the reaction time differences in categorizing different birds • Smith et al. (1974) – feature model can account for data that network models cannot (a concept consists of a set of values on a large number of semantic dimensions) • Categorization judgment (Juola and Atkinson, 1971) • a categorization judgment proceeds from the instance to the category but Quillian’s theory (1966, 1969) assumes the search proceeds from both the instance and category in parallel

  5. Spreading-Activation Theory • Anderson and Bower (1973) reject a Quillian-like model of a parallel search, while acknowledging that their data are compatible with a parallel model whose search rate is slower in proportion to the number of paths that must be searched • THE EXTENDED THEORY • Local Processing Assumptions • When a concept is processed, activation spreads out along the paths of the network in a decreasing gradient. • The longer a concept is continuously processed, the longer activation is released from the node of the concept at a fixed rate • Activation decreases over time and/or intervening activity

  6. Spreading-Activation Theory • With the assumption that activation is a variable quantity, the notion of intersection requires a threshold for firing • Global Assumptions about Memory Structure and Processing • The conceptual (semantic) network is organized along the lines of semantic similarity (Fig 1) • The means of concepts are stored in a lexical network (or dictionary) that is organized along lines of phonemic (and to some degree orthographic) similarity • Loftus’s data lead to the further assumption that a person can control whether he primes the lexical network, the semantic network, or both

  7. Spreading-Activation Theory

  8. Spreading-Activation Theory Assumptions about Semantic Matching Process In order to decide whether or not a concept matches another concept, enough evidence must be collected to exceed either a positive or a negative criterion If the memory search finds that there is a superordinate (or a negative superordinate) connection from X to Y, that fact alone can push the decision over the positive (or negative) criterion

  9. Spreading-Activation Theory If the memory search finds properties on which X and Y match (i.e., common properties), this is positive evidence proportional to the criteriality of the property for Y The Wittgenstein strategy is a variant of the property comparison strategy The mutually exclusive subordinates strategy was necessary for programming a computer to answer questions Counterexamples also can be used as negative evidence

  10. Spreading-Activation Theory • RECENT EXPERIMENTS • Production Experiments of Loftus • Freedom and Loftus (1971) • produce an instance of a category that began with a given letter or was characterized by a given adjective (name a fruit that begins with the letter A or a fruit that is red) • faster when the category was given first than when either the letter or the adjective was given first?

  11. Spreading-Activation Theory • Loftus (1973b) used four kinds of category-instance pairs • Pairs where both the category and instance evoked the other with high frequency (e.g., tree – oak) • Pairs where the category evoked the instance with high frequency, but the instance evoked the category with low frequency (seafood – shrimp) • Pairs where the category evoked the instance with low frequency, but the instance evoked the category with high frequency (insect – butterfly) • Pairs where both the category and instance evoked the other with low frequency (cloth – orlon) • Category first  a and b equal, faster than c and d • Instance first  a and c equal, faster than b and d

  12. Spreading-Activation Theory • Grober and Loftus (1974) • noun-adjective (fruit – red), noun-letter (fruit – A) • a noun-adjective trial occurs in the semantic network and requires the further step of retrieving the corresponding name in the lexical network • On the other hand, a noun-letter trials occur at the name in the lexical network. Therefore, the name does not need to be retrieved • Loftus and Cole (1974) – dictionary-network model • noun-adjective-letter or noun-letter-adjective • faster when the adjective is presented before the letter

  13. Spreading-Activation Theory • Juola and Atkinson’s Study with Multiple Categories • category-search model (Landauer and Meyer, 1972) – subjects searches through instances of the categories in memory seeking a match for the stimulus word • as the number of categories or words in the memory set increases, RT for the category-matching task should increase at a greater slope than RT for the word-matching task

  14. Spreading-Activation Theory • Effects of Typicality and Semantic Relatedness in Categorization Tasks • semantic similarity speeds up positive decisions and slows down negative decisions • the way evidence is aggregated • distinguishing properties slows down the positive decision – matching properties slows down a negative decision • related to those cases where a superordinate connection is found • accessibility will be highly correlated with typicality ratings • Holyoak and Glass (1975) – two different cases where semantic relatedness or typicalitydoes not produce the usual effect on RT for negative judgments – mutually exclusive subordinates and counterexample

  15. Spreading-Activation Theory • Relation of the Theory to the Model of Smith, Shoben, Rips • the meaning of a concept by semantic features of two kinds: defining features (a member of concept) and characteristics features (not necessarily for concept membership) • in a categorization task, the two concepts are first compared in Stage 1 with respect to all their features, both characteristic and defining • second comparison in Stage 2 based on just the defining features • there is no feature that is absolutely necessary for any category • the model of Smith et al. has several inherent difficulties without the use of superordinate links • when people have superordinate info stored, they do not use it • people seldom know the defining properties of concepts

More Related