1 / 7

An investigation into student preferences of different blended learning modes on a part-time MSc

An investigation into student preferences of different blended learning modes on a part-time MSc. Dr Doris Jepson Bristol Business School. The context. Part-time postgraduate context Need for a blend of online & face-to-face for students from Health & Social Care Sector

winda
Download Presentation

An investigation into student preferences of different blended learning modes on a part-time MSc

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An investigation into student preferences of different blended learning modes on a part-time MSc Dr Doris Jepson Bristol Business School

  2. The context • Part-time postgraduate context • Need for a blend of online & face-to-face for students from Health & Social Care Sector • Limited research on blended learning within this context • Research is part of a larger project - Work-in-progress • Blended modes on this MSc: • Online component as supplement to class-room based teaching • Online sites: Interactive vs. Communication vs. Information-sharing

  3. Literature • Use of online technologies for • File sharing & transfer; communication; quizzes; assessment etc. (Morris & Rippin, 2003) • Autonomous learning vs. tutor-led (Sharpe et al., 2006) • Students ask for and use supplementary online resources (e.g. Boyle et al, 2003; Dickinson, 2005; Codone, 2004; Hibberd, 2006 etc.) • Some studies find positive results for peer learning through VLEs (e.g. Kickul & Kickul, 2004; Franklin and Peat, 2001; Garrison, 2006) • Online support empowers students to interact with materials and construct a deeper understanding of the subject where and when it suits them (Weyers et al., 2004; Catley, 2005)

  4. Methods • So far analysis of student engagement with the three different online components • Analysis of blackboard statistics • Analysis of frequency and quality of discussion activity • Analysis of use of Wiki and Quizzes participation • Still to come: semi-structured interviews with students on experiences with and preferences of different blended learning modes

  5. Findings Discussion • Active student engagement with all sites but relatively greater use of the interactive blackboard site • Discussion activity only successful when structured and tutor-led – communication remains still one-way • Kear (2004) and Clouder and Deepwell (2004) found similar evidence for need for structure and timing • Poor use of quizzes and Wiki • Overall clear preference for file transfer rather than interactive tools • Smart and Holyfield (2004) have similar findings on student preferences

  6. Questions • Is there a difference in usage of and needs for blended learning modes on UG vs. PG modules and PT vs. FT? • Are we barking up the wrong tree if students prefer to download information rather than interact online? • Is there a space for supplementary interactive tools or are they only successful when part of formal distance learning?

  7. References • Boyle, T, Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R. and Pickard, P. (2003), ‘Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program’, Journal of educational Media, Vol. 28(2-3), pp. 165-178 • Catley, P. (2005), ‘One lecturer’s experience of blended learning with traditional teaching or How to improve retention and progression by engaging students, Brookes eJournal for Learning and teaching, Vol. 1 (2), pp. 1-8 • Clouder, L. and Deepwell, F. (2004), ‘Reflections on unexpected outcomes: Learning from student’s collaboration in an online discussion forum. Networked Learning Conference, Available from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2004/proceedings/individual_papers/clouderanddeepwell.htm (17 April 2009) • Codone, S. (2004), ‘Reducing the distance: a study of course websites as a means to create a total learning space in traditional courses’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 47 (3), pp. 190-199 • Dickinson, J. (2005), Enabling e-learning in higher education, Newcastle Business School • Franklin, S. and Peat, M. (2001), ‘Managing change: The use of mixed delivery modes to increase learning opportunities’, Australian Journal of Educational Technology • Garrison, D.R. (2006), ‘Online Collaboration Principles’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 10(1) • Hibberd, S., Litton, C. and Chambers, C. (2006), ‘MELEES – reflective overview on use of a VLE in supporting student learning’, HELM Conference, Loughborough, HE Academy Engineering Subject Centre • Kear, K. (2004), ‘Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education, Open Learning, Vol. 19 (2), pp. 151-164 • Kickul, J. and Kickul, G. (2004), ‘E-learning challenges and processes: Understanding the role of student self-efficacy and learning goal orientation’, International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 4(1) • Morris, H. and Rippin, A. (2003), ‘Virtual Learning Environments in Business and Management: A Review of some recent developments’, International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 3(2), pp. 23-30 • Sharpe, R., Benfield, G. Roberts, G. and Francis, R. (2006), The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice, The Higher Education Academy Report, Available from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/research/literature_reviews/blended_elearning_full_review.pdf (17 April 2009) • Smart, C. and Holyfield, S. (2004), ‘An evaluation of the use of blackboard in teaching and learning in UWB. University Wales Bangor • Weyers, J., Adamson, M and Murie, D. (2004), ‘Student e-learning survey report, Dundee: University of Dundee, Available from http://www.dundee.ac.uk/learning/dol/ELS_final_report.pdf (17 April 2009)

More Related