1 / 18

J. C. Tinoco and J.-P. Raskin Université catholique de Louvain Microwave Laboratory B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

RF Extraction Techniques for Series Resistances of MOSFETs. J. C. Tinoco and J.-P. Raskin Université catholique de Louvain Microwave Laboratory B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium . OUTLINE. Introduction Bracale´s Method Bracale´s Modified Method Results Conclusions . INTRODUCTION.

yaakov
Download Presentation

J. C. Tinoco and J.-P. Raskin Université catholique de Louvain Microwave Laboratory B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RF Extraction Techniques for Series Resistances of MOSFETs J. C. Tinoco and J.-P. Raskin Université catholique de Louvain Microwave Laboratory B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Bracale´s Method • Bracale´s Modified Method • Results • Conclusions

  3. INTRODUCTION Different methods have been developed to determine the extrinsic series resistances. They can be divided in two groups:DC and RF methods. DC Methods RF Methods • It is possible to extract independently the drain, source and gate resistances. • Device biased under different conditions. • Requires the equivalent circuit analysis. • It is not possible to extract independently the drain and source resistances: • RT = Rd + Rs • It is not possible to determine the gate resistance.

  4. INTRODUCTION The main RF methods are: Lovelace, Torres-Torres, Raskin and Bracale. • Lovelace and Torres-Torres´ methods are quite sensitive to noise. • Signal pre-treatments do not improve the extraction. Torres-Torres Lovelace

  5. INTRODUCTION • Raskin´s method also is quite sensitive to noise. • Signal pre-treatments seem to improve the extraction. • For deep-submicron devices its application seems limited. • Bracale´s method is less sensitive to noise. • Fails to determine the correct resistance values. Raskin Bracale • Deep analysis is necessary for the Bracale´s method

  6. Bracale´s Method Bias: VDS = 0 V & VGS>VT Gmi → 0 • Assumptions: • Perfectly symmetric Device: Cgsi = Cgdi = C • Constant mobility

  7. INTRODUCTION Bracale´s Method Impedance Relationships: 

  8. Bracale´s Method Linear regression of the impedance relationship respect to the inverse of the gate overdrive. The intercept gives the corresponding series resistance.

  9. Bracale´s Method • The extracted values differ from the values used in the simulations. • It is necessary to review the assumptions made: • Perfectly symmetric Device: Cgsi = Cgdi = C • Constant mobility

  10. Bracale´s Modified Method Mobility degradation coefficient: The inverse of the output conductance is a linear function of the inverse of the gate overdrive: The slope “s” and the intercept “b” are: And thus:

  11. Bracale´s Modified Method The impedance relationships will be expressed as:  They follow linear function respect to the inverse of the gate overdrive, the slope “x” will be:

  12. Bracale´s Modified Method • The mobility degradation strongly affects the extraction accuracy. • Considering non-perfectly symmetry, the impedance relationships will be expressed as: Where k = Cgs/Cgd is called the asymmetry coefficient.

  13. Bracale´s Modified Method Thus, the extracted series resistances will be obtained as: • Overcome the limitations of the classical method. • Non-perfectly symmetry is considered. • Mobility degradation coefficient is included (θ).

  14. Bracale´s Modified Method Asymmetry coefficient: The imaginary part of the impedance parameters follow the next relationships: Thus, we can obtain k as:

  15. Results ELDO software was used to simulate the S-Parameters of Partially-Depleted 0.13 µm SOI n-MOSFETs. The BSIM3SOI model from ST-Microelectronics was used. Rse = Rde = 3 W & Rge = 5 W

  16. Results q = 0.6 Rse = 3 W

  17. Results Rge = 4.85 W Rde = 3.2 W

  18. Conclusions • Original Bracale´s method does not allow accurate extraction of the series resistances. • The main limitations of this method are: the carrier mobility degradation and transistor asymmetry. • A new procedure was established, where the both effects are included. • q is obtained from DC output conductance measurements. • k is obtained as the ratio of the imaginary part of Z-parameters. • The new procedure allows to determine the correct resistance values.

More Related