1 / 17

Promoting TMDL Innovations in Region 1

Promoting TMDL Innovations in Region 1. Anne Leiby US EPA, Region 1 State-EPA Symposium on Environmental Innovation and Results Denver, CO Tuesday, January 24, 1:45 – 3:15. Background: Motivators for TMDL Innovations in Region I. Problem-solving orientation

yakov
Download Presentation

Promoting TMDL Innovations in Region 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Promoting TMDL Innovations in Region 1 Anne Leiby US EPA, Region 1 State-EPA Symposium on Environmental Innovation and Results Denver, CO Tuesday, January 24, 1:45 – 3:15

  2. Background: Motivators for TMDL Innovations in Region I • Problem-solving orientation • Support and collaboration of senior leadership at state and federal level • Urgency of problem*: • Low production of TMDLs in region • Region 1 had approved 11% of total TMDL universe = 219 of 2040 impaired waters (places region 2nd from bottom for approval pace of TMDLs) • Unwillingness to take risk/desire to protect environment • A+ TMDLs = standard and agency culture • Focus on point source TMDLs • 7 of 10 regions involved in lawsuits (Regions 5,1,2 have no lawsuits, but also slowest pace of production) *(figures as of December, 2003)

  3. Development of TMDL Innovations in Region 1 • First Meeting of Regional State-Federal Innovations Group (June, 2002) • TMDL Summit (January, 2003) • MOU between states, Region 1 (April, 2003): • Increase pace of TMDL development • Address stormwater • Develop “other pollution controls” to meet water quality (through non-TMDL methods) – known as “(4b)” • TMDLs appear on national IAC-ECOS Joint Work Plan (April, 2004)

  4. Increase Pace of TMDL Development/Stormwater Innovations • Environmental Effectiveness: focus on actual problems: • Transition to non point source TMDLs • Implementation as key to environmental improvement • Efficiency: Develop standard protocols for bundling or grouping common types of TMDLs • Resulted in development of: MA Pathogen TMDLs and Impervious Cover Methodology

  5. Innovation #1: MA Watershed Pathogen TMDLs • Goal: to develop state-wide TMDL designed to eliminate pathogen contamination throughout all 27 MA watersheds (representing 375 waterbodies/TMDLs) • Method: • 1 generic template – apply throughout state • Use existing data • No “traditional” loads – translate water quality standards into concentration that applies at end of pipe throughout water body • Focus efforts on implementation efforts/guidance • Automatically apply to future waters determined to be impaired for pathogens

  6. MA Pathogen Watershed TMDL - Challenges • National precedents? • Concentration-based approach w/o more segment-specific info may not be acceptable • Intersection with permit program • Reasonable assurance that environment will be better off • Stakeholders • Is this really a TMDL? • Raises larger stormwater issues generally • Bottom Line: addressing challenges and moving forward. • Lesson Learned: Involve key stakeholders earlier in process.

  7. Innovation #2: Impervious Cover

  8. Impervious Cover

  9. 12% IC Threshold % IC and ALUS

  10. ALUS and Streams > 11% IC

  11. Southwest Coast Effect – Green on Top, Red on Bottom Meets ALUS Fails ALUS > = 11% IC

  12. Impervious Cover – Region 1 Proposed Approach • Use % Impervious Cover as a surrogate for pollutants and causes related to aquatic life use impairments • (but if identity of pollutant is known which is believed to be contributing to the impairment of the use, an individual allocation should be done) • Achieving % IC reductions set forth in future TMDLs means: disconnecting IC that is directly connected to water bodies and installing BMPs

  13. Innovation #3: “Other Pollution Controls” Approach to Meeting Water Quality: 4b • Innovative Efforts are focused on: • Clarifying guidance • Understanding current universe of 4bs around country • Implementation focus – developing ”other pollution controls” designed to meet water quality standards more efficiently and effectively than a TMDL approach • Developing supportable 4b scenarios with states • Innovations Challenges: • Role of adaptive management • Degree of risk (approx. 129 4bs in 2004) • Proof required at time of approval that water quality standards will be met

  14. Challenges to Implementing TMDL Innovations in Region 1 • Precedent-setting nature of changes • Stakeholder interests/involvement • Resources (“innovations” vs. “core program”) • Time – intensive nature of work • Incentives to “innovate” are often few: • Not much $ (but: SIG grants, $ follows good ideas) • Leaders are few (but: they do exist at all levels within agencies) • Those promoting viewed as “outside the mainstream” – which is a hard place to be in most bureacracies

  15. Lessons Learned in Region 1: • Prioritize innovations that provide the most significant environmental results • Involve stakeholders early on • Seek alignment of goals with states and national program offices • Prioritize innovations that provide transferable results • Celebrate the power of the individual change agents • Change “national scorecards” for what success means • Don’t give up – change takes time and persistence – the benefits can be great.

  16. So, What Are The Possible Benefits of Innovation? • Forces continuous improvement • Significant environmental outcomes • Increased efficiencies – leveraging of scare resources • Empowerment of staff/management that tackle problems in creative, problem-solving manner • Culture Change – build trust across traditional office/agency/stakeholder lines • Apply lessons learned (including those from failed attempts) to improve upon future work

  17. Region 1 Contacts: • MA DEP • Rick Dunn 508-767-2874 • CT DEP • Christopher Bellucci 860-424-3735 • EPA Region 1 • Mike Hill 617-918-1398 • Anne Leiby 617-918-1076

More Related