1 / 33

KEK  高エネルギ ,

Projektbericht BELLE. KEK  高エネルギ ,. Collaboration. Rekordluminosität. Neue wichtige Resultate. HEPHY Physik-Analysen. SVD Upgrade bei BELLE. KEKB Collider. e -. e +. L peak = 1.62 × 10 34 cm -2 sec -1 design = 10 34 cm -2 sec. 8GeV. 3.5GeV. 600 fb-1. = 0.425. bg. B-Factory

yanni
Download Presentation

KEK  高エネルギ ,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Projektbericht BELLE KEK 高エネルギ, Collaboration Rekordluminosität Neue wichtige Resultate HEPHY Physik-Analysen SVD Upgrade bei BELLE

  2. KEKB Collider e- e+ Lpeak=1.62 × 1034cm-2sec-1 design=1034cm-2sec 8GeV 3.5GeV 600 fb-1 = 0.425 bg B-Factory (on the 4s resonance) BB threshold

  3. BELLE-Detector ECL CDC KLM SVD

  4. Pure leptonic decay Signal Remaining energy of signal B in ECL One B (tag) fully reconstructed 2.05+0.65-0.55(stat) Ikado et al hep-ex/0604018 4.0 s

  5. 10.75 0.245

  6. signal qq K*g other B First Observation of bd  Mohapatra. Nakao, Nishida et al hep-ex/0506079 CDF CDF _ Addresses the same physics issue as Bs- Bs mixing

  7. Additional Constraints for Unitary Triangle    

  8. Current status Constraints from “Loop” Constraints from tree CPV angles only: η=0.321±0.027 =0.193±0.57 sides only: η=0.342±0.02 =0.216±0.06

  9. HEPHY Physik-Analysen Christoph Schwanda: Bp l n / Br l n / Bw l n  Vub Laurenz Widhalm: Formfaktoren semileptonischer D° ZerfälleFranz Mandl+G.L+H.D: BRs der inklusive Zerfälle D°  KK (F) X Gerhard Leder + L.W.: BRs der inklusive Zerfälle DsGerald Richter: Dekohärenz Modelle verschränkter B-Paare Winfried Mitaroff: Y(5S)Bs(*)Bs(*)[D0K0s]

  10. Semileptonic Formfactors K p recoil p D*- K recoil pslow D0 „inverse“ fit recoil K/p+ e/µ- n p p Method of Reconstruction (Event Topology)  additional primary mesons IP 3.5 GeV e+ e- 8 GeV D* g p mass-constrained vertex fits D note: • all possible combinations tried in parallel • cuts after complete reconstruction • equal weight for remaining combinations  no event loss due to particle exchanges! Ktag p  signal side  tag side

  11. Summary of Signal / Background Decomposition D0 Ken D0 pen remaining signal data fake-D0 bkg data D0 Kmn D0 pmn hadronic bkg data Kln bkg data K*/rln bkg MC mn² / GeV² *error dominated by MC statistics ** error dominated by fit errors & bias special bkgsample

  12. Absolute Branching Ratios • ratio to total number of recoil D0 tags • efficiency correction • corrected for bias due to differences data/MC (1.9%±3.9%)

  13. Form Factors – Comparison with Models D0 Kln fit results modified pole model simple pole lattice calculation ISGW2 model D0 pln modified pole (poles fixed at theo. values) preprint hep-ex/0604049, submitted to PRL

  14. D0 - BranchingRatios D0(K+K-) X Data Generic MC D0 D0 K0 K+K- K0 X F F

  15. D0(K+K-) X Mass window D0: 1.84<M(D0)<1.89 Data Mass window F: 1.00<M(F)<1.04 Generic MC • PDG f f 1.71% +/- 0.76 1.02%+/-0.14 D0 D0 Correct BGshape from MC ? 0.37%+/-0.04 0.39%+/-0.012 BG?= 4*35 Mass window D0= 332-80(sideband)=252 Mass window D0=191-25(sideband)=166 Mass window F=458-182(sideband-extr) =276 Mass window F= 255- 141(side-extr)=114

  16. drydiff gen MC m(K+K-) RS-WS comparison with data (*), scalefactor 0.445 greenD0 X pink  not from D0 blueD0 K+K-X yellow no D0 redno K+(K-)

  17. fitdat DATA FIT m(K+K-) 3 Gaussians+ Polyn. 4th order

  18. Missing Mass for D0F X Mass window F: 1.00<M(F)<1.04 Data Generic MC K0 K0

  19. Ds recoil Ds*- recoil „inverse“ fit p p Method of Reconstruction (Event Topology)  additional primary pions IP 3.5 GeV e+ e- 8 GeV p K+ p ... Signal • Ds inclusive Example DsF X PDG:(18+/-10)% or exclusive: (semi)leptonic Dsm n BaBar (0.65+/-0.08)% Dst n (6.4+/-1.5)% DsF l n (2.0+/-0.5)% g mass-constrained vertex fits D Ds- recoil µ- n Ktag p  signal side  tag side

  20. Ds

  21. c s New: Ds → mn and fDs Helicity-suppressed leptonic decay: • directly related to decay constant fDs • feeds interpretation of B, Bs mixing Analysis Method: “D reco” in e+e- → cc D reco side Signal peak in (normalize to Ds → fp) BaBar (230fb-1): Lattice QCD: Single best measurement of decay constant! BaBar

  22. Best Candidate Selection signal / no ambiguity signal / several associations signal / lost because wrong candidate selected background Ds invariant mass Ds invariant mass no best candidate selection largest “slow” gamma energy taken signal yield can be increased by a „best candidate selection“ in case of ambiguities, e.g. by choosing maximal „slow“ gamma momentum improvement: ~40% important: no bias on background! a cut on the Ds fit (not done in the plots) further increases the yield

  23. first look into data (only 3.2% of available data) • simple fit gaussian + linear curve for rough estimate • hope: reconstruction of muon and neutrino of Dsmn or Ds F m n will further reduce ambiguity  enhancement of signal • cuts are still under development • Ds  t n needs suppression of remainingenergy in ECL, similar to Bt n analysis Ds invariant mass DATA (ca. 3.2% of available statistics) Fit: 705 events  ca. 22000 Ds expected in total Room for improvement also best candidate selection might be further improved Cross-check with hadronic channels, i.e DsF p

  24. Gerald Richter z1 , t1 μ+ z0 , t0 z2 , t2 The decay typical Υ(4S) resonance decay • βγcτB0 = 196 μm(LAB) l+ l- K0s π- entanglement region π+ θ 8 GeV e- 3.5 GeV e+ beam axis • Δm= 0.489 1012 ћs-1 = 0.754 τB0-1

  25. Adapted response function model “gaussian pagoda” resolution function R(t) shown for t1 parameter good accordance of fit function up to +/- 4 mm sum of 2 gaussians + back to back neg. exponential

  26. lower tail cut upper tail cut applied cuts to get fit working • varied the symmetric quantile cuts, to find point, where the ML fit is not disturbed by tails. • with lower = upper percentage of histogram entries within the ± 40 τB0 window removed • t1: 0, 1, 2, 4 % • dt: 0, 1, 2 %

  27. for 2 cases of fixed dt quantile cuts 1%, 2% behaviour of the ML fit result for a given λTRUE = 0 with increasing cut percentage, λFIT pulled towards 0 cutting too much will impair error model correctness 2% for both parameters looks like a good choice. fit results on signal BELLE-MC with varied quantile cuts fit works BELLE-MC with different l in preparation

  28. SVD 2.5

  29. SVD 2.5

  30. SVD 2.5

  31. Generated number of events (~May 22) k events 18Mevents per 20 days 870days for seed0-2 Need your help! VIENNA Service Jobs Generic MC-Production for BELLE-Collaboration

More Related