1 / 15

Non-point pollution control & irrigation: Some Australian experience

Non-point pollution control & irrigation: Some Australian experience. Prof. Mike Young Research Chair, Water Economics and Management The University of Adelaide "Irrigation Technology to Achieve Water Conservation,” Zaragoza, Spain, 12-15 th May 2008. Main Non-Point Pollution Problems.

Download Presentation

Non-point pollution control & irrigation: Some Australian experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-point pollution control & irrigation:Some Australian experience Prof. Mike Young Research Chair, Water Economics and ManagementThe University of Adelaide "Irrigation Technology to Achieve Water Conservation,”Zaragoza, Spain, 12-15th May 2008

  2. Main Non-Point Pollution Problems • Irrigation salinity (Murray-Darling) • Sediment & nutrient pollution (Great Barrier Reef) • Nitrate contamination of groundwater & surface water systems. Case Studies • River salinity in the Murray-Darling Basin • Hunter River • Geographe Bay • Dryland salinity trading

  3. Institutional Structures Federation • Responsibility with individual state governments States • Environmental duty of care on land users.

  4. Education & Governance • 56 Natural Resource Management Region Boards established • Accessing National money • Emerging Regional Autonomy • Employing own staff

  5. Market – Based Instrument Trial Conclusions First Round ($5 million) • Auctions, cap & trade (for point sources) & offsets work • MBI’s can deliver large savings • MBI’s require testing & adaptation for landholders to participate • MBI’s need to be tailored to individually, no one-size-fits all

  6. Interstate Salinity trading • Aim to keep river salinity at Morgan • <800 μS/cm of electrical conductivity for 95% of the time • States pay for cost of off-setting the damage they would otherwise do • Salinity impacts recorded on “A” & “B” salinity register • “A” salinity register – all recent causes of salinity change • “B” salinity register – ‘legacy of history’ impacts • Debits to the “A” salinity register charged to States according to estimate of economic impact of each unit of salinity as measured at Morgan

  7. Hunter River - tradeable salinity permit • Limited to factories in the Hunter • Factories receive permits and allowed to minimise costs of disposal • Number of permits required to discharge a unit of salt into the River is a function of ambient river salinity • Firms have incentive to store saline wastewater and discharge when ambient salinity is low • Trading is now well established

  8. Busselton Bubble Licensing • Town of Busselton wanted to expand and dispose treated sewage into Geographe Bay • Dairy industry responsible for 95% of the nitrates and phosphates that flow into Geographe Bay • 5 % only from town • Treatment of town sewage would cost • $5 million plus $200K per annum • Cheaper to reduce pollution from dairying • Needed to employ people to negotiate agreements

  9. Dryland Salinity Trading (Bet Bet, Victoria) • Bet Bet, Victoria is one of the largest contributors to salinity in River Murray System • Trial to invite farmers to participate in a program that would enable them to trade salinity reduction credits • Allow farmers to deliver the contracted outcome in the most efficient way possible • Reward payment made to all farmers if the trial delivers agreed outcome • Conclusions • More efficient and cost effective than regulation • Collective group incentive payment (a reward) increases community interest and participation • Reward “first-mover proofed” the trial

  10. Salinity Levy - Victoria Salinity levies charged for permanent trades between High Impact Zones (HIZ) & Low Impact Zones (LIZ). (No trade is allowed within or into a High Impact Zone)

  11. Salinity off-sets (SA) • SA uses off-set approach to manage salinity • Irrigation areas classified into 3 zones • Low impact • High impact • High impact zones behind a salinity interception scheme • Off-set trading has lead to increase in irrigation development opportunities at no cost

  12. Salinity off-set policy (SA)

  13. Environmental Benefit Indices • Indices enable objective evaluation of relative merits of different project outcomes • Dramatic increase in returns per public dollar invested • Experience • Most benefits of MBIs derive from the benefit index • Tenders more cost-effective if uniform payment per unit of benefit delivered is paid

  14. Applicability & recommendations • Countries should consider using market-based approaches they work! • Greater flexibility in achieving control • Leave greater opportunity for innovation • Allow non-point source control at less cost • Lessons • Underpin with regulations & implement at local scale • Focus on land use change & keep simple • Consider community reward schemes • Use indices • Point source controls can be used to deliver non-point benefits

  15. Subscribe to our droplet series at www.myoung.net.au Contact: Prof Mike Young Water Economics and Management Email: Mike.Young@adelaide.edu.au Phone: +61-8-8303.5279Mobile: +61-408-488.538 www.myoung.net.au

More Related