1 / 30

ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment. Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D. John Stanford International School Seattle, WA. Overview of the Evaluation.

yori
Download Presentation

ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ELLOPA 2001 and 2002Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D. John Stanford International School Seattle, WA

  2. Overview of the Evaluation • 2001 ELLOPA was conducted by team from Center for Applied Linguistics over 4 days in May with K and 1st grade students (completing first year of immersion) • 2002 Evaluation was completed by JSIS staff and UW graduate students over 3 weeks in May-June with K, 1st, and 2nd grade students (1st and 2nd graders completing second year of immersion) • 2002 Evaluators received training in ELLOPA interviewing and rating at UW in April, 2002, as well as on-site training and coaching with Beverly Boyson of CAL in May, 2002 John Stanford International School

  3. Language Areas: Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening Comprehension Proficiency Levels: Junior Novice Low (1) Junior Novice Mid (2) Junior Novice High (3) Junior Intermediate Low (4) Notes: All ratings above 4 were categorized as 4 for the purposes of the ELLOPA statistics. Teachers used the same Rating Profile to rate students based on classroom experience. About the ELLOPA John Stanford International School

  4. What do we want the data to tell us? • How well are our students learning Spanish or Japanese? (Can we see growth across years?) • Do students learn Japanese at the same rate as Spanish? • How well did we do in assessing our students’ language proficiency? (How do ELLOPA ratings compare to Teacher Ratings?) John Stanford International School

  5. ELLOPA – Kindergarten ELLOPA Spanish 2001 - K ELLOPA Spanish 2002 - K ELLOPA Japanese 2002 - K John Stanford International School

  6. Teacher Ratings – Kindergarten Teacher Ratings Spanish 2001 - K Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 - K Teacher Ratings Japanese 2002 - K John Stanford International School

  7. ELLOPA Spanish 2001 - K John Stanford International School

  8. ELLOPA Spanish 2002 - K John Stanford International School

  9. Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 - K John Stanford International School

  10. ELLOPA Japanese 2002 - K John Stanford International School

  11. Teacher Ratings Japanese 2002 - K John Stanford International School

  12. ELLOPA Spanish/Japanese K Mean or Average of Scores in 2001 and 2002 John Stanford International School

  13. ELLOPA Spanish/Japanese 2001 - 2002 - K Mean or Average John Stanford International School

  14. ELLOPA 1st Grade ELLOPA Spanish 2001 – 1st(after first year of language) ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 1st(after second year of language) John Stanford International School

  15. ELLOPA Spanish 2001 – 1st (first year in the program) John Stanford International School

  16. ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 1st (second year in the program) John Stanford International School

  17. Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 1st (second year in the program) John Stanford International School

  18. ELLOPA & Teacher Ratings 2nd Grade ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 2nd(after second year of language) Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 2nd(after second year of language) John Stanford International School

  19. ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 2nd (second year in the program) John Stanford International School

  20. Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 2nd (second year in the program) John Stanford International School

  21. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating – K ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 vs. 2002 – K John Stanford International School

  22. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 - K Mean or Average John Stanford International School

  23. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating 1st – 2nd ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – 1st, 2002 – 1st ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2002 – 2nd John Stanford International School

  24. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 1st (2001 – one year of study; 2002 – two years of study) Mean or Average John Stanford International School

  25. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 2nd Mean or Average John Stanford International School

  26. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Growth ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – K, 2002 – 1st ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – 1st, 2002 – 2nd John Stanford International School

  27. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – K-1 growth (growth over 2 years) Mean or Average John Stanford International School

  28. ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 1-2 growth (growth over 2 years) Mean or Average John Stanford International School

  29. Paired ELLOPA Ratings 2001, 2002 – K-1 and 1-2 growth This is the most accurate representation of growth because it compares only students who were in the program both years. Mean or Average According to CAL, the rate of growth is statistically significant. John Stanford International School

  30. How did JSIS raters compare to CAL? Beverly Boyson of CAL reviewed ELLOPA note sheets from JSIS raters and modified ratings where appropriate Number of Ratings of Oral Fluency, Grammar, Vocabulary, and Listening Comprehension John Stanford International School

More Related