1 / 49

Case presentation

Case presentation. 醫學七 蕭皓天 8831121 Supervisor 許明欽醫師. Basic data. Name :羅 X 化 Age : 43 y/o Gender : male Dominant : Right hand Admission date : 94/10/20. Chief complaints. Severe headache for 1 months with progression. Present illness. Well before

yorick
Download Presentation

Case presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Case presentation 醫學七 蕭皓天 8831121 Supervisor 許明欽醫師

  2. Basic data • Name:羅X化 • Age:43 y/o • Gender:male • Dominant:Right hand • Admission date:94/10/20

  3. Chief complaints • Severe headache for 1 months with progression

  4. Present illness • Well before • One month ago:occipital headache suddenly after sitting up for 10 mins.

  5. Present illness • Accentuated:upright position • Relieved:recumbent • Timing:seconds or minutes after sitting or standing • Severity:made him didn’t like to get up from bed

  6. Present illness • Frequency:every times when upright position • Quality:throbbing • No aura, no photophobia, no phonophobia

  7. Present illness • 9/19:Our ER, brain CT:normal • Recent one week: more severe, extended to vertex • Nausea, vomiting and hiccup • 10/20:Dr.許’s OPD • Admission

  8. Social History • Smoking:1 ppd/day • Alcohol (-) • Betal nut (-)

  9. Other History • Hypertension (-) • Diabetes mellitus (-) • Operative history (-) • Head traumatic history (-) • Lumbar puncture history (-) • Allergy:nil • Family history:not contributory

  10. Physical examination • Moderate nutritional and well-developed, looks inpatient, irritant and general weakness • T/P/R:36.3C, 80/min, 18/min, BP:134/77 mmHg • HEENT:normal • Neck:no bruit, no jugular vein engorgement, no thyroid enlargement

  11. Physical examination • Chest:no chest wall deformity, clear BS • Heart:regular heart beat, no murmur • Abdomen:soft, flat, no tender, normoactive bowel sound • Extremities: no cyanosis, no pitting edema

  12. Neurological examination • Consciousness:alert, oriented • No overt high cortical dysfunction • Cranial nerve:intact • Eye:no papilledema • Neck:supple, no Kernig sign, no Brudzinski sign

  13. Neurological examination • Pyramidal system: • No atrophy • Muscle power:Full MRC grading bilaterally • Symmetric normoreflexia • No pathologic long tract sign • Extrapyramidal system: • No rigidity, no spasticity, no tremor • Sensory system:intact

  14. Neurological examination • Cerebellum: • Finger to nose: Smooth • Romberg test: Stable, tandem gait:ok • Autonomic system: • palpitation(-), nausea(+), vomiting(+), constipation(-), diarrhea(-) • No sphincter dysfunction

  15. Lab data • GPT/ALT 108 IU/L • BUN 24 mg/dl • TCH 227 mg/dl • LDL-C 167 mg/dl • TG 237 mg/dl

  16. Headache What kind of headache suggests a serious underlying disorder ?

  17. Headache Symptoms That Suggest a Serious Underlying Disorder • "Worst" headache ever • First severe headache • Subacute worsening over days or weeks • Abnormal neurologic examination • Fever or unexplained systemic signs • Vomiting precedes headache • Induced by bending, lifting, cough • Disturbs sleep or presents immediately upon awakening • Known systemic illness • Onset after age 55 Headache presents as above indicates intra-cranial tumor, hemorrhage (Ex.SAH) meningitis…etc

  18. Tentative diagnosis • Acute orthostatic headache

  19. Isolated orthostatic headache DDx • Intracranial hypotension CSF volume depletion - spontaneous  most likely! - dural puncture - surgery - penetrating trauma • Colloid cyst of 3rd ventricle  Brain CT(-)

  20. After admission… MRI was arranged immediately

  21. 10/20 Brain MRI T1WI (isointensity)

  22. 10/20 Brain MRI T2WI (hyperintensity)

  23. Brain CT 9/19 vs 10/21

  24. Clinical course • Subdural hemorrhage diagnosed by neuroimage => Neurosurgeon suggested operation • He and his family refused • Discharged against advice on 94/10/21

  25. Question 1 According to the clinical picture, spontaneous intracranial hypotension leading to bil. SDH was suspected, were there similar cases in the world?

  26. Intracranial hypotension • A generalized sagging of the brain with downward displacement of the cerebellar tonsils • Downward displacement leads to bringing vein break  SDH

  27. Syndrome of orthostatic headaches and diffuse pachymeningeal gadolinium enhancement. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 72:400-413, 1997. • Patients had diffuse meningeal enhancement, 69% had evidence of subdural CSF collections and 62% showed a descent of the brain

  28. 31 y/o male, previously healthy • Headache:occipito-parieto-temporal • Accentuated:upright position • Relieved:recumbent • Getting worse and worse, nausea, vomiting • NE, lab:normal

  29. Subdural effusion Diffuse dural thickening with enhencement

  30. CSF:low pressure (10cm H2O) • SIH was diagnosed • Consciousness↓, epidural blood patch and surgical drainage was performed • Consciousness recovered and headache subsided

  31. .Spontaneous intracranial hypotension associated with bilateral chronic subdural hematomas – Case reportNeurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2000 Sep;40(9):484-8. • 34-year-old female:severe postural headache and meningism. • MRI:diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement. • Bil. chronic SDH 4 weeks after the onset of the symptoms. MRI showed descent of the midline structures of the brain.

  32. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension associated with bilateral chronic subdural hematomas – Case reportNeurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2000 Sep;40(9):484-8. • An uncommon and probably unrecognized condition, because of the usually benign course. • However, SIH is not entirely benign.

  33. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension associated with bilateral chronic subdural hematomas – Case reportNeurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2000 Sep;40(9):484-8. • SIH should be considered  no identifiable risk for ICH, particularly in young patients. • Neurosurgical intervention may be required for the underlying cerebrospinal fluid leak and subdural effusion

  34. Question 2 Why MRI was performed first?

  35. Intracranial hypotension • Diffuse meningial thickening - Compensatory venous engorgement secondary to the chronically low CSF volume ▲ Subdural effusions

  36. Level II • CT versus MRI • CT:very limited value. Usually normal and only quite infrequently may show subdural fluid collections or increased tentorial enhancement Sensitivity 85%, specificity 65% • MRI:diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement, which is the most common MRI abnormality. Sensitivity > 95%, specificity > 90%

  37. Return to our patient • MRI was important for diagnosis of intra-cranial hypotension • There were several cases like this patient in the world • Spontaneous intra-cranial hypotension’s prognosis is good. It’s a pity that he refused further treatment such as epidural patch and operation

  38. Question 3 Should our ER perform CT?

  39. In patients with atypical headache patterns, a history of seizures, or focal neurologic signs or symptoms, CT or MRI may be indicated  Class III

  40. Historical or physical abnormalities are not sensitive for intracranial process, but abnormal physical or historical findings increase the likelihood of positive CT findings  Class II

  41. Study supports the importance of a neurologic examination; however, 29 of 34 Patients with focal findings didn’t have positive CT findings, and 4% of patients with normal neurologic examination findings had positive CT results Class II

  42. Clinical findings and historical findings had a low positive predictive value but absence had a high negative predictive value  Class II

  43. Conclusion • Atypical headache with either abnormal physical, neurologic, historical findings or a history of seizures  CT or MRI was indicated • CT was not very essential for this patient

  44. Comment • 李宜恭主任:SIH診斷的golden standard? Ans:Lumbar puncture. 許明欽醫師:這個病人為什麼沒有做,是因為本來打算在手術完之後,做lumbar puncture確立診斷,同時加做cisternography來判斷到底是哪裡在漏CSF?(不先做lumbar puncture是擔心有herniation的危險性)只是病人要求出院,這些study工作才未完成。

  45. Comment • 李宜恭主任:對這個病人來說,做CT還是有必要,因為他還是符合危險頭痛其中幾項,在沒辦法完全排除出血或腫瘤的前提下,做CT是可接受的。而且這個病人症狀有緩解(休息和bed rest本來就會讓病人覺得恢復),沒有繼續留下來觀察尚屬合理。

  46. Comment • 許明欽醫師:大多數SIH會自己好,因此ER讓病人出院是合理處置。重點還是在於病人症狀有減輕,影像學又沒有finding。

  47. Comment • Int. 傅斯誠:bil. SDH在什麼情形下會發生? 許銘欽醫師:通常還是以trauma最常見。

  48. Thanks!

More Related