1 / 78

Border Lakes Subsection Forest Resource Management Plan

Border Lakes Subsection Forest Resource Management Plan. SFRMP Training Session October 2006. Purpose of Session. Provide a brief overview/context of SFRMP. Expose staff to considerations in developing the plan and the resulting goals and strategies.

yosefu
Download Presentation

Border Lakes Subsection Forest Resource Management Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Border Lakes Subsection Forest Resource Management Plan SFRMP Training Session October 2006

  2. Purpose of Session • Provide a brief overview/context of SFRMP. • Expose staff to considerations in developing the plan and the resulting goals and strategies. • Walk through some case examples for discussion. • Provide an opportunity to ask questions about the Border Lakes plan.

  3. What is an SFRMP? • DNR plan for vegetation management on forest lands administered by DNR Forestry and Wildlife. • Using ECS subsections as the planning unit. • Focus on forest composition goals, vegetation management, creating multi-year stand examination lists, and identifying new access needs.

  4. Scope of SFRMP • Focus is on future forest composition goals and vegetation management strategies. • Appropriate SFRMP issues are directly affected by, or directly affect, management of vegetation on DNR lands. • Issues are generally defined by • Forest vegetation conditions and trends • Threats to forest vegetation • Vegetation management opportunities.

  5. Completed Late-2006 Completion Mid-2007 Completion Late-2007 Completion 2008 Completion SFRMP Schedule

  6. Why SFRMP? • Need for new management plans in many Forestry Areas. • Need to improve public awareness/ involvement in DNR forest management planning (i.e., opening the "black box"). • Need for interdisciplinary approach to address complex forest management issues.

  7. Why by subsections? • Plan on natural or ecological boundaries rather than administrative boundaries. • Subsection level has been used for other landscape planning/assessment efforts. • Old Growth Forest designations • Basis for DNR ERF guideline • White pine initiative • Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare. • Fewer plans (30 Areas vs. 17 subsections) • GIS capabilities now make it easier to do plans on ecological landscape basis.

  8. SFRMP Process Objectives • Effectively informs and involves the public and stakeholders. • A process that is credible to most. • A clear process that is well communicated to the public (i.e., transparent). • Reasonable and feasible within current staffing levels and workloads. • Results in improved forest management.

  9. Key Aspects of SFRMP • A Department plan (i.e., interdisciplinary, consent-based process) • Department involvement and support • A defined and documented process • Public review/input opportunities • Aggressive time schedules • Adaptive

  10. SFRMP Components • Assessment & Preliminary Issues (2000) • Strategic Direction (2002) • Desired future forest conditions (DFFCs) • Goals and strategies • Responding to final issues • 10-Year Stand Selection Results and New Access Needs (2005) • Final Plan (2006)

  11. Border Lakes SFRMP Team • Current • Maya Hamady, Walt Gessler, Bill Schnell, John Stegmeir • Past members • Mike Albers, Tom Engel, Dana Frame, Joe Geis, Bob Heisel, Dave Ingebrigtsen, Bob Maki, Laurie Martinson, Tom Rusch, Ray Tarchinski, Jim Weseloh, Steve Wilson

  12. Land Ownership • 2.8 million acres (all ownerships) • USFS lands 56% • Wilderness & national park 44% • State lands in SFRMP 13% (298,000 acres) • 98% Forestry admin. • Timberlands 265,000

  13. Forest Composition

  14. NE Regional Landscape DFFCs • A forest that: • approximates/moves toward the range of variability for natural plant communities • has spatial patterns (size and location of openings) that are consistent with the ecology of northeastern Minnesota • provides diverse habitat to maintain natural communities and viable populations • The desired future forest condition is a long-term condition and can only be achieved by moving in incremental steps

  15. NE Landscape Goals and Strategies • Mesic White-Red Pine (12% of landscape) • Goals • Increase white and red pine component • Increase 101+ growth stage of w/r pine • Strategies • Harvest aspen & birch out of mature birch-conifer growth stage (51-100 years). • Implement conifer retention where present.

  16. NE Landscape Goals and Strategies • Mesic Aspen-Birch (20% of landscape) • Goals • Increase the 81+ year multi-aged conifer growth stage • Increase the white pine, white spruce, and tamarack component. • Strategies • Reserve white pine seed trees • Encourage spruce/fir regeneration to protect pine. • Underplant white pine & white spruce • Mimic natural patterns of disturbance in harvest via variable retention of residuals.

  17. NE Landscape Goals and Strategies • Dry Mesic White-Red Pine (11% of landscape) • Goals • Increase red/white pine & white spruce components • Increase the old growth stages (121+ years) • Strategies • Restore pine on sites currently dominated by hardwoods, aspen in particular • Underplant red/white pine & white spruce • Maintain current stands dominated by pine • Manage to enhance mature white pine & multi-aged pine-spruce-fir.

  18. NE Landscape Goals and Strategies • Jack-pine – Black spruce (21% of landscape) • Goals • Increase jack pine component • Strategies • Maintain jack pine composition where it currently exists • Harvest mature jack pine and restore via variety of methods as sites dictate

  19. NE Landscape Goals and Strategies • Northern Hardwoods (10% of landscape) • Goals • Increase white pine, yellow birch, white spruce and white cedar components • Increase multi-aged growth stage (>150 years) • Strategies • Apply uneven-aged management in 51-100 year stands to increase multi-aged characteristics

  20. Final Issues • Timber harvest levels • Timber productivity • Timber sale access • Forest cover type composition • Within stand composition • Forest age composition • Forest spatial patterns • Riparian and ecological processes • Rare & sensitive plant communities, species, biodiversity

  21. Issue: Timber Harvest Levels • DFFC: Provide a sustainable timber harvest level, considering current & future ecological, economic, & social needs. • Strategies: • Integration of strategies for all the issues.

  22. Issue: Timber Productivity • DFFC: TP is increased on state forestlands through more intensive management on some lands. • Strategies • Harvest stands at a younger age • Evaluate HRLV stands • Increase intermediate stand treatments • Convert stands of low quality birch & aspen to conifers • Manage some ERF for large sawtimber.

  23. High Risk-Low Volume (HRLV) • Stands that are “high risk” or decadent due to old age, low volume, or I&D problems. • Primarily aspen, birch, j. pine, balsam fir, lowland black spruce forest types • All HRLV stands assigned a “field visit” preliminary prescription. • All HRLV will be field visited during the 10-year planning period. • HRLV decision tree developed to guide management decision.

  24. HRLV (cont.) • 15,000 acres or about 27% of all stands selected. • Anticipated to be the primary opportunity for cover type conversion goals • Estimated that 50% of HRLV stands will result in a timber sale.

  25. Issue: Timber Sale Access • DFFC: Access provided for state forest management while protecting or minimizing negative effects on other forest resources. • Strategies • Continue maintenance of “system” roads. • Follow policies and guidelines for NR management access routes and temporary access. • Cooperate in access planning across ownerships.

  26. Issue: Forest Cover Type Composition • DFFC: Increase acres of upland conifers • Strategies • Allow natural succession of some aspen, birch and BG to conifers. • Convert some aspen, birch and BG to conifers. • Manage for w. pine/w. cedar understory. • Selective & uneven-age harvest to favor conifer regeneration. • Reserve conifer seed trees. • Protect advanced conifer regeneration. • Use prescribed fire.

  27. Issue: Within Stand Composition • DFFC: Species and structural diversity within stands will be increased. • Strategies • Uneven-aged management in w.pine, lowland/northern hardwoods, cedar, and a portion of spruce-balsam cover types. • Follow MFRC site-level guidelines to retain diversity. • Retain diversity when thinning. • Reserve seed trees in harvest/regeneration sites. • Protect advanced regeneration.

  28. Issue: Within Stand Composition (cont.) • Strategies (cont.) • Regenerate via natural succession in some stands. • Protect regeneration from browsing. • Use Rx fire for fire dependent habitats. • Increase w.pine in other cover types. • Increase upland cedar, oak, yellow birch and tamarack in other cover types. • Manage plantations to resemble natural stands. • Maintain some black spruce, j.pine, and r.pine as pure stands.

  29. Issue: Forest Age Composition • DFFC 1: Balanced age structure for even-age types. • Strategies • Treat selected stands. • ERF in a variety of age classes. • DFFC 2: More old pine and conifers. • Strategies • Multi-aged/layered stands • Some lowland mixed conifers as all-aged.

  30. Issue: Forest Age Composition (cont.) • DFFC 3: Retain old forest component. • Strategies • Maintain adequate ERF. • Manage riparian areas primarily as old forest. • Allow some stands to succeed without harvest. • Use prescribed fire.

  31. Extended Rotation Forest (ERF)

  32. Issue: Forest Spatial Patterns • DFFC 1: Average patch size is larger • Strategies: • Use riparian corridors & existing old forest to enlarge large old patches. • Restore or maintain original stand size. • Harvest adjacent to recently harvested sites. • Use selective harvest to retain old patches. • Coordinate patch management with others. • Reserve areas from harvest.

  33. Forest Spatial Patterns (cont.) • DFFC 2: Connectivity between patches. • Strategy: • Use riparian corridors & existing old forest to connect large old patches. • DFFC 3: Maintain some old large patches. • Strategy: • Manage some large patches as ERF.

  34. Forest Spatial Patterns (cont.) • DFFC 4: Patches are distributed in a range of sizes and ages. • Strategies: • Establish definitions and goals for patches. • Plan harvest across a range of timber sale sizes. • Utilize prescribed fire.

  35. Patch sizes

  36. Example patches

  37. P=patch FP=future patch O=old I=intermediate Y=young   1=large 2=medium large 3=medium U=upland L=lowland D=deciduous C=conifer M=mixed Patch codes (e.g., PO2UC)

  38. Forest Spatial Patterns (cont.) • DFFC 5: Patches represent the cover types in the subsection. • Strategy: • Increase upland conifer medium and large patches.

  39. Issue: Riparian & Ecological Processes • DFFC: Water quality is protected and natural processes are allowed to occur. • Strategies: • Manage for ERF in most riparian areas. • Favor b.fir, w.pine, w.spruce & cedar in upland, low fire frequency areas. • Favor j.pine, r.pine & aspen in upland, high fire frequency areas. • Apply SNN act restrictions where applicable. • Apply MFRC site-level guidelines.

  40. Issue: Rare & sensitive plant communities, species, ecological processes & biodiversity • DFFC 1: R&S species and plant communities are protected. • Strategies: • Protect old growth. • Protect identified Ecologically Important Lowland Conifers (EILC). • Refer to NH database in stand selection. • Use NPC field guide. • Protect sensitive & high quality NPCs and species.

  41. EILC • DNR OG Guideline did not address old growth lowland conifers • Department direction to identify EILC as a pool for potential old growth stands • Team identified approximately 3,600 acres of EILC • Stands are reserved from harvest during this 10-year plan, but don’t affect harvest levels • Team selected based on criteria such as: • old age (e.g., >100 years) or all-aged • limited human-caused disturbance • ecologically significant or representative of a range of NPCs • part of an identified corridor

  42. Issue: Rare & sensitive plant communities, species, ecological processes & biodiversity (cont.) • DFFC 2: Genetic variability of tree species is retained. • Strategy: • Use appropriate seed sources. • DFFC 3: Ecological processes and biodiversity are protected. • Strategies: • Use identified strategies to managed towards DFFCs. • Use NPC field guides in managing NPCs.

More Related