1 / 17

Genetics as a form of identity and affiliation? Recognizing the need for privacy

Genetics as a form of identity and affiliation? Recognizing the need for privacy. Katharina Liebsch , Hamburg. Point of interest : Sociology of every-day communication. What is the meaning of Genetics for so called ordinary people?

yukio
Download Presentation

Genetics as a form of identity and affiliation? Recognizing the need for privacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Genetics as a form of identity and affiliation?Recognizing the need for privacy Katharina Liebsch, Hamburg

  2. Point of interest: Sociology of every-daycommunication • What is the meaning of Genetics for so called ordinary people? • How do people understand genetic information? How do they adjust to it? • Using empirical data of micro level every day-communication- within families,- with insurances,- at the workplace and- in communication between doctors andpatients.

  3. Social, institutional and normative contexts of Genetics in Germany Field of Medicine: • offers health insurance for all citizens based on a system of contributory financing for the majority of citizens. • Most hospitals and medical offices are run as private enterprises which are strictly regulated by governmental laws that • demand rights of equal treatment and freedom of doctor’s choice. • Ethics: - idea of tolerance towards people who are ill, - claim to grant an autonomous life for people being sick or disabled. • Genetics have always been a point at issue:- Political and ethical debates on advantages and dangers of genetic knowledge

  4. Legal frame: Genetic Diagnosis Act 2010 • administers the use of genetic information, • introduces genetic education and genetic counselling in the procedure of genetic tests and prenatal genetic check-ups, • aims at guaranteeing a right of informational self-determination, • aims at providing protection against genetic discrimination.

  5. Genetic ‚realities‘ • Cultural contexts, societal regulations and the handling of genetic information by individuals. • The category “Genetic” becomes significant and important through two vectors: 1. Labelling from above, from a community of experts (scientists, legal experts and politicians) 2. behaviorof the person labelled as being “genetically at risk”, which presses from below.

  6. Example: Genetic ‘reality’ of Cystic Fibrosis Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is most common among Caucasians: • In the European Union: 1 : 2000 – 3000, • In AfricaCF: 1: 17.000, • In Asia: 1: 90.000. But:Beyondit’sethnicspecificity, CF points to a characteristic of manyforms of geneticdisorders: How to deal withtheconditionalprobability of thegeneticknowledge?

  7. Genetic information of Cystic Fibrosis Symptoms • Difficultybreathing • lung- and sinusinfections • poorgrowth • infertility. Cause • mutationin thegenefortheproteincysticfibrosistransmembraneconductanceregulator (CFTR), locatedat chromosome No 7 • recessive nature of thedisorder • mutationDelta F508 accountsfortwo-thirds of CF cases • over1500 othermutationsthatcanproduce CF.

  8. Enacting genetic information of Cystic Fibrosis Interview-Studywithparents • whoeitherknowabouttheirstatus of carryingthemutation • orwhoareworriedabouthaving a sickchildbecause CF appeared in theextendedfamilycircle. Reports on: • Becoming a „person at risk“ and howthischangedtheirself-perception and their private and intimate life. • 2 institutionsorganizethispassage:- GeneticCounselling- Pregnancycounsellingofferingspecialprenataldiagnostics.

  9. GeneticCounselling: thevisitor’sperspective Theexample of Mr. and Mrs. Jahn: • parentsof a healthydaughter • sisterof Mrs. Jahn’sgavebirth to a baby thatdieddue to CF at the age of sixmonths Theirpersonal riskevaluation: • Mrs. Jahn: 1:2 to be a carrier • Mr. Jahn: 1:25 to be a carrier • 1:4 to pass it on to thechild • 1:200 to have a childwith CF.

  10. GeneticCounselling: thevisitor’sperspective Offeringa geneticdiagnosis: • gene-testdetectsaround 70% of mutations, • wouldhelp to raiseor to minimizethe personal riskevaluation of Mrs. and Mr. Jahn. • Cannotpredictthedegree of severity of thechild’sillness- Some die withinthe a fewyears,- othergrow up quite normal and realize as adultsthattheyarenotable to conceivechildren,- othersareveryweak and in theneed of medicalcareduring all theirlife).

  11. GeneticCounselling: thevisitor’sperspective „Puzzlingexperience“ brougt up concerns: • Whatistheprobabilisticbenefit of thenewgeneticinformation? • Doctorstreatindividuals, Geneticistsdo riskcalculation on populationalscale: Howdoesthis fit together? • Feeling an emphasis to getactivenotknowingwhatconsequencesto draw. • Feeling theneed to fit a newcategory. • to respond to thenewnotion of geneticresponsibilityafterfinding out about Mrs. Jahn’scarrierstatus.

  12. To adress to thenewnaming One half of theparentsinterviewed • planneda non-mediatedpregnancy, willing to riskhaving an affectedchild, • referred to a moralframeworkthatvaluesactiveparenthood and honoursdifferences:Mrs. Jahn:„And as far as I am concerned, a childwith a disabilityis no less of a worthyperson to live“ . „Wedecidedthatit was importantforourdaughter to have a sibling, regardless, so thattheywouldhaveeachother. That’skind of howwelooked at it. So wedecided to do that“.

  13. Changingthespaceof possibilities of personhood Twogroups of parentsinterviewed: • Knowingabouttheirrisk-status and continuingto havechildren • Framework offamilyvalues to extendbeyondriskcalculations of transmitting a geneticdisorder • Advocatingforlove and appreciation of childrenregardless of theirgeneticstatus • heighteningawareness of theirownparentingstrengthand limits.

  14. Changingthespace of possibilities of personhood • To stopreproducingwhentheyfound out abouttheircarrierstatus • Limitingtheinvisionedfamily and familyplans as „duty“ and „responsibility“, • Managingtheowngenetically-at-riskstatusisaccompaniedbycomplicatedtensions: - feelingsad, - beingnotable to put up withtheamount of workthatcomesalongwithhaving a CF-child, - decision to selectagainstchildrenliketheonestheyalreadyhad- sense of beingcensured and criticisediftheypassed on a geneknownto cause a severedisease- uneaseaboutthepossiblesocietalconsequences of such genetictesting-basedchoiceover time.

  15. Genetic knowledge and it’s complexities and ambivalences Reports illustrate • complexities, contradictions and ambivalences embedded in the experiences of undergoing genetic testing, genetic counselling and reproductive decisions. • Reproduction is not a straightforward decision based on circumscribed notions of genetic risk and genetic responsibility, but involves a complex negotiation of personal desires, family values and diversity as well as familial work capacities. • To pass on a genetic disorder depends on values, personal likes and dislikes as well as abilities.

  16. Privacy as realm to reflectuponone‘sown Dealing with genetic and ethnic information: • Differences of the every day handling of people need to be acknowledged. • Recognizing and granting privacy, a realm in which the distinctiveness of being a person genetically at-risk (or ethnically specified) may live comfortably.

  17. Thankyouforlistening!

More Related