1 / 16

Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development

Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development. W. Wuensch EUCARD2 rf program review 18 July 2011. Task 2: Overall objectives Advance high-gradient, normal-conducting rf technology through development of:

Download Presentation

Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development W. Wuensch EUCARD2 rf program review 18 July 2011

  2. Task 2: Overall objectives • Advance high-gradient, normal-conducting rf technology through development of: • two types of high-gradient CLIC structures - main linac accelerating structures and crab cavities • high-power and beam-based X-band test infrastructure. • Spread X-band and high gradient expertise to many labs – has been concentrated at CERN/KEK/SLAC

  3. Rapidly spreading X-band and high-gradient technology • Linear colliders: CLIC • Compact FELs: KVI Groningen, Trieste, Frascati, MaRIE • Compton-scattering light sources: MEGARAY • Medical accelerators: TERA, X-ray sources • Instrumentation: rf based high performance streak cameras

  4. Task 2: Activity structure • CLIC main linac accelerating structures with wakefield monitors • CEA • Manchester • PSI • X-band crab cavities • Lancaster • Manchester • STFC • High-power and beam test infrastructure • CEA • PSI • (Valencia) Overall coordination: CERN

  5. 4. CLIC_DDS_A Axial E-Field Surface E-Field E-field Port11 Port 2 7.5 Beam 7 Matching cell Ez (V/m x104) Es (V/m x104) 5.0 0 300 0 z (mm) 225 z (mm) • Match-out the full, tapered structure • E-field and S11 shown ~198.6mm

  6. 2. Work in Progress +Future Plans Standard DDS Manifold Additional Manifold I/P at /2=15.9GHz • CLIC_DDS_A is equipped with mode launchers –aim is to demonstrate ability to sustain HP • CLIC_DDS_B includes full HOM ports • Matching the HOM coupler for CLIC_DDS_B (dipole band ~ 15.9 GHz – 18 GHz) • Construct pair of structures with full damping features • Moving to a high phase advance (HPA) structure allows other parameters to be optimised • 5/6 phase advance structure design in progress • In the HPA design further features being explored • Additional manifold (8), add SiC? Sic EnhancedCoupling Sic

  7. Context of the X-band activitiesat CEA Saclay • CEA entered in the CLIC collaboration with the construction of the Probe Beam Linac CALIFES in CTF3 (in 2005) • Exceptional contribution of France to CERN • CTF3 contributions: • HV modulator and RF components for the CERN klystron test stand and TBL line • Accelerating structures for the Two Beam Test Stand • Period : 2008 – 2012, Budget = 1 M€ - 48 persons-months (p.m.) Accelerating structures (fabrication in progress) HV Modulator RF Components

  8. Wakefield monitor development for CLIC accelerating structures GdfidL simulation of TM modes, beam offset dx = 1 mm • Wakefield Monitors = Beam Position Monitors integrated to the accelerating structures • Allows beam-based alignment of structures to remove wakefield effects and emittance growth • Emittance growth very well improved by aligning the structure to an accuracy of 5 µm 18 GHz DX DY • Accelerating Structure features : • TD24 (CERN design) without RF absorbers • 100 MV/m accelerating gradient • 24 tapered cells with 2/3 phase advance at 12 GHz with mean aperture of 5.5 mm • dipole mode above 16 GHz • WFM features : • WFM = Two coaxial rf pick-ups on the middle cell damping wg • on large side wg for TM-like modes • on small side wg TE-like modes Hybrid HEM modes in the cell generated by an offset beam

  9. CLIC Crab Cavity R&D • CLIC-CC R&D: • Multi-cell 11.9942 GHz dipole-mode cavity developed. • Various mode damping schemes investigated: • Choke • Waveguide • An optimised 7-cell, waveguide damped design being investigated further. • LLRF R&D: • CLIC-CC and LHC-CC phase control models under development.

  10. The 12 GHz Power station project at CEA Saclay • Independant operation to CTF3 • Proximity with chemical lab and clean room Specifications : RF Frequency: 12 GHz Peak power: 120 MW Pulse length: 300 ns Repetition rate: 50 Hz • Main features: • Modulator HT 430 kV • Klystron 50 MW – 1.5 µs • RF Pulse compressor SLED • LLRF withfast phase modulation Klystron Test structure area RF Pulse compressor Modulator 10

  11. WP tasks • Design and fabricate multi-purpose RF Front Ends for WFM. • Should be easily adaptable to different frequencies; 15 GHz, 18 GHz, 24 GHz • Build hard-ware for CTF3 and SwissFEL injector. • Design and fabricate alternative WFM(s) for other structures • (collaboration with CERN). • 3. Test and commission the different RFFE and pick-ups with beam at CTF3 and • SwissFEL injector. Resources: Hardware: 6 RFFE ~ 120 kE; WFM ~ 80 kE. Manpower (PSI): Scientist/engineer 6 months, post-doc 2 years, technician ~ 2 years. + CERN manpower (?) Participating laboratories: CERN, PSI Infra-structures involved: CTF3, SwissFEL Injector

  12. Main beam outward pick up 12 GHz Oscillator CLIC Crab High Power Distribution • Need to understand long term phase stability of the distribution scheme • Requires an experiment to measure phase transients. travelling wave cavity Laser interferometer Control Dual Output or Magic Tee Waveguide with micron-level adjustment Waveguide with micron-level adjustment LLRF LLRF Phase Shifter From oscillator 12 GHz Pulsed Klystron ( ~ 20 MW ) Pulsed Modulator Vector modulation Control main beam outward pick up

  13. Broad range of participants, many activities • Extension of ongoing EUCARD activities • Recent expression of interest also by the University of Valencia

  14. CERN request reduced to coordination manpower only • Roughly flattens €/lab/activity to 350-400k • Activities are stretched, posts are lost, but primary deliverables are maintained

  15. Participation of certain participants in certain activities have been eliminated. • Some deliverables are eliminated • Need to ask the question whether we are below minimum worthwhile level for further participant-activities.

More Related