1 / 18

Twin research in Hungary

Twin research in Hungary. Presented by: Zsófia Drjenovszky Rita Hegedűs András Pári MSZT: 11.2012. Antecedents. MSZT in 2011 3 aspects Make up for the lack Long-range Proposals. Twin researchers in Hungary. (Saile, Tivadar 1928; Darányi, Gyula 1941; Malán, Milán 1962) Czeizel, Endre

zack
Download Presentation

Twin research in Hungary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Twin research in Hungary Presented by: Zsófia Drjenovszky Rita Hegedűs András Pári MSZT: 11.2012.

  2. Antecedents MSZT in 2011 3 aspects Make up for the lack Long-range Proposals

  3. Twin researchers in Hungary (Saile, Tivadar 1928; Darányi, Gyula 1941; Malán, Milán 1962) Czeizel, Endre Métneki, Júlia (Bagdy, Emőke; Mérei, Ferenc) Tárnoki brothers Littvay, Levente

  4. About our research • Research questions: - Is being twin an asset? - Do demographic characteristics have an effect? • Reasons: - Changes in the law and the area of the progress of the medical researches - Relevant literature in Hungary is limited - Sociological point of view • In the year 2012: - Contact with the Hungarian researchers - Finding twins and parents of twins

  5. Collecting data by questionnaire • Reasons for collecting data by questionnaire • The questionnaire • How could we reach the target group? - twin festivals • snowball method (internet) • invitation • Advantages/Disadvantages

  6. The twins’ sample Questionnaires filled in at twin festivals: 81 Questionnaires filled in at other places: 141 Online respondents: 123 people (56,7%) Both member of a set of twins: 77 One member of a set of twins: 63 Two or three members of a triplet: 2 (in sum: 5 people)

  7. RESULTS – The sample (Twins’ questionnaires)(140 people) Identical twins /fraternal twins: 83 and 55 people Conception: 3 people by artificial ways Gender: 105 female/35 male respondent (75% / 25%) Gender and type of twins: 62 identical females 21 identical males 26 fraternal females 8 fraternal males 20 fraternal, male-female twins (of which 15 female, 5 male respondents) Siblings: beside his/her twin, 103 respondents have one or moresiblings (74%) Age: 38,2 years on average

  8. The use of ‘twinship’ – questions and methods Question: Is there a difference between twins in that how deeply they feel about being a twin and in the degree and type of the usage of being a twin? So, is ‘twinship’ an asset? Methods: Linear regression Dependent variables: 7 indexes dealing with the features of being a twin (evaluating of being a twin, extrinsic characteristics of use, use of twins’ bonds, active and passive use of the advantages, general use of being a twin) Independent variable: gender, zygozity

  9. Use of ‘twinship’ – assumptions and results. 1. Gender The use of ‘twinship’ - results • ‘Twinship’ is more important for women, they are more involved in the theme. – Not confirmed. • Women use their ‘twinship’ as an extrinsic feature more than men. – Confirmed if we controlled for zygozity. • Men rather then women use their ‘twinship’ in territories where they have to show results, such as education. – Not confirmed. On the contrary, it was women who do that. • Women are inclined to use of their ‘twinship’ in a passive way, while men in a more active way. – Partly confirmed. Women use their twinship more in both an active and passive way.

  10. Use of ‘twinship’ – assumptions and results. 2. Type of twins ‘Twinship’ is more important for identical twins, and they are those who use the advantage of being a twin more than the fraternal twins. – Confirmed. There is an order in the use of the advantage of being a twin. It is: female identical – male identical – female fraternal – male fraternal – male/female fraternal twins. – Partly confirmed.The real order is: female identical – male identical – male/female fraternal – female fraternal – male fraternal twins. So the ‘mixed’ fraternal twins are more impressed in their ‘twinship’ then the unisexed pairs.

  11. The parents and their twins(PARENTS’ questionnaires) • PARTICIPATION of 575 PARENTS (92% are mothers): Altogether:1150 person’s data received (= information on both parent’s socio-demographic background) Respondents are from: • Individual (personal) request for parents having twins – 48% • Twin research database (Special thanks for the Dr. Tárnoki’s  ) – 23% • Twin festivals (Szigethalom, Ágfalva, Kunhegyes) – 20% • Not specified – 9% TWINS: - Age: 1 months old – 18 years old Average age at the sample: 4 yrs 3 months [  since 2006 in each kindergarten group we could statistically find at least one twinpair!] - Gender:first born 51% boy, 49% girl

  12. RESULTS – Age, marital status(Parents’ questionnaires) Average age at the birth of the twins: - Mother: 31,2 years old [National average (2010)= 29,1 yrs; Budapest= 31,7 yrs] - Father: 33,8 years old Marital status at the birth of the twins: • Since ’90s the twin births’ rate has increased among married mothers • At age 30-34 the chance of having twins are 4%; Age 35-39 is 5% • 80% of the couples are married

  13. RESULTS – The twins in family (Parents’ questionnaires)

  14. RESULTS – Rate of assisted reproduction (Parents’ questionnaires) 1. Among lower educated parents the rate of natural conception is higher (76%) and the rate of test-tube babies are lower (19%) 2. Families participated in assisted reproductional treat- ment have far more high (59,5%) family income. 3. Among religious families* the rate of test-tube baies are more less (16%); natural conception rate is 81%! (*religious= attend to religious service, goes to church at least once a month)

  15. RESULTS – Assisted reproduction and mother’s age (Parents’ questionnaires)

  16. RESULTS – Family income(Parents’ questionnaires)

  17. RESULTS – ”Twin being” (Parents’ questionnaires) • Almost each respondent are PROUD OF HAVING TWINS (98,8%) BUT! Only 49,7% of the parents said that there are MORE ADVANTAGES than disadvantages (4,2%) having twins. (46,1% „Couldn’t decide”) • „TWIN BEING”: 1/3 of the parents thinks that being a twin for the children is VERY IMPORTANT, 46% said that IMPORTANT, but not necessary, 18% opinion is not very important

  18. Thank you for your attention! www.ikerfelmeres.5mp.eu E-mail: ikerfelmeres@gmail.com

More Related