1 / 1

J/ y  e+e- measurements in √ s_{NN} = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions by PHENIX at RHIC

Poster # 187. J/ y  e+e- measurements in √ s_{NN} = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions by PHENIX at RHIC. Results – BdN/dy/Ncol and R AA. Subtracted Invariant Mass spectra. NJ / y. 1. dN. B. =. 0-10%. 10-20%. 0-20%. D yNcol. x e acc x e embed x e run. Nevt. dyNcol. NJ / y. 1. dN. 1.

zaina
Download Presentation

J/ y  e+e- measurements in √ s_{NN} = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions by PHENIX at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Poster # 187 J/y  e+e- measurements in √s_{NN} = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions by PHENIX at RHIC Results – BdN/dy/Ncol and RAA Subtracted Invariant Mass spectra NJ/y 1 dN B = 0-10% 10-20% 0-20% DyNcol x eacc xeembed xerun Nevt dyNcol NJ/y 1 dN 1 1 B = Dy DpT x eacc xeembed xerun Nevt pT p 2 p 2 dydpT pT • BdN/dy/Ncol • 6 centrality classes (0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-60 and 60-92%) • BdN/dy/Ncol in p+p collisions and d+Au collisions (MB) are shown. • Bracket corresponds to systematic error. • dotted line corresponds to BdN/dy/Ncol in p+p collisions and its 1 sigma stat. error. • Observation of J/y suppression, especially for 0-10 and 10-20%. BdN/dy/Ncol (Npart) 145.4 +- 25.3 155.1 +- 19.2 292.7 +- 31.9 20-30% 30-40% 20-40% ( dNJ/y ( dsJ/y ) ) • RAA and Model comparison • Grey Band is the scale error that moves all the points up or down together. • Suppression factor ~ 2.5 at 0-10% central. • Comparison to the theoretical models RAA RAA (Npart) B B = 124.2 +- 14.7 87.9 +- 11.1 209.0 +- 18.5 dyNcol dy pT (GeV/c) 0.75 1.25 1.75 2.5 4.5 0.25 AuAu pp efficiency 1.00 % 0.82% 0.69% 0.54% 0.47% 0.91% 40-60% 60-92% 40-92% • Nuclear absorption • sabs =1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 7.1 mb centrality 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-60% 60-92% 1 efficiency 78.5 % 80.9% 86.5% 94.3% 95.2% 98.2% Comover scattering Capella et.al. hep-ph/0505032 sinelpp Direct dissociation Grandchamp et.al. hep-ph/0306077 70.1 +- 9.6 26.7 +- 5.4 97.8 +- 11.0 Suppression in QGP Kostyuk et.al. hep-ph/0305277 Kostyuk et.al. hep-ph/0305277 Statistic Coalescence A.Andronic et.al. nucl-th/0303036 Hadron-String Dynamics Central Arms Coverage (East and West) -0.35< y < 0.35, 30o <|f |< 120o Bratkovskaya et.al. nucl-th/0402042 Transport in QGP Zhu et.al. nucl-th/0411093 Suppression and Regeneration Grandchamp et.al. hep-ph/0306077 Regeneration • From the comparison to theoretical models • Consistent with the normal nuclear absorption (sabs = 3.0 +- 1.5 mb) for centrality > 20% and suppression beyond the nuclear absorption (sabs = 3.0 +- 1.5 mb) for centrality 0-10%. • Comover and Suppression in QGP over-predict the suppression. • Results of other models are consistent within the currect stat. and sys. error • Ring Imaging at RICH • 3.4 cm <r < 8.4 cm Energy- Momentum Matching at EMCal All charged tracks Electron BG RICH cut Taku Gunji, CNS, Univ. of Tokyo, for the PHENIX Collaboration J/y measurements in Heavy Ion Collisions “Signature of de-confined Quark-Gluon-Plasma” • J/y Suppression • Color Debye Screening in QGP • Melt from T>Tc • T. Matsui and H. Satz, Phys. Letr. B. 178, 416 (1986) • Survive up to T~2Tc (from Lattice calculation) • M. Asakawa and T.Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 012001 (2004) • Nuclear Absorption • Nuclear dependence • SPS (NA38, NA50), Fermi Lab (E772) • Comover Scattering • Secondary interaction in hadronic phase • J/y enhancement • Recombination uncorrelated c and cbar • At RHIC, Ncc =10~ 20 @ central collision • Statistic Coalescence • formation of J/y at phase boundary • Detail balance • J/y + g  c + cbar Peripheral collisions Central collisions NA50 NA50, Phys. Lett. B477 (2000) 28. L.Grandchamp et al. : hep-ph/0306077 • Need to do systematic study of J/psi formation. • RAA vs. centrality • Shape of pT distribution (centrality dependence) • Nuclear Dependence (d-Au, Cu-Cu) • Energy dependence (200GeV, 62.4 GeV) • Rapidity dependence (PHENIX Muon arms) V. Tram(#171), M.Brooks(#130), M. Kweon(#139) K. Das(#181), D.Silvermyr(#208), A.Bickley(#129) Results – Invariant pT spectra R.L.Thews et.al. nucl-th/0505055 • Red triangle • initial production • Blue circles • in-medium recombination • <kT2> = 1.3 GeV2 • Green and Blue • pQCD charm distribution • Black • thermal + flow • T=128MeV. b=0.6 • Red • thermal + no flow • T=128 MeV. b=0 Summary and Outlook • First results of the centrality dependence of BdN/dy/Ncol and RAA • Consistent with the normal nuclear absorption (sabs = 3.0 +- 1.5) for >20% centrality and suppression beyond the normal nuclear absorption for 0-10% centrality. • Comover and Suppression in QGP over-predict the suppression at RHIC. • Results of other models are consistent within current stat. and sys. error. • First results of invariant J/y pT spectra (0-20, 20-40, 40-92%and MB). • No significant centrality dependence of <pT2> • Detail analysis with Muon results and Cu+Cu results. • Rapidity dependence and Nuclear dependence • J/y v2 measurement in Au+Au, Cu+Cu collisions • Need to understand the charm production in Heavy Ion Collisions • non-photonic electron v2 and spectrum • charm thermalization, charm pT distribution • Invariant pT spectra • Important measurement to understand the J/y formation scenarios. (suppression/recombination). • Suppression in QGP predicts larger <pT2>. • Recombination (charm thermalizetion) predicts smaller <pT2>. • But pT spectra have a dependence on charm pT distribution. • <pT2> vs. Npart was extracted for 0-20, 20-40, 40-92%, MB centrality classes. • First results at Mid-rapidity in Au+Au collisions at PHENIX. • Fitting was done with: A(1+(pT/B)2) -6, <pT2> = (B/2)2 • The result of <pT2> as a function of number of participants shows there is no clear Npart dependence of <pT2> with the current error bars. PHENIX Detectors Data Analysis A complex apparatus to measure:Hadrons, Muons, Electrons, Photons • PHENIX Year4 Au+Au Experiment • 1.6B events (240 mb-1 ) • 75% analyzed J/psi analysis • Optimized eID cut • Mixed event back ground • Signal counting (2.9<Mee<3.3 GeV) • Efficiency calculation by Simulation • pT dependence • centrality dependence • Centrality Measurement • Beam Beam Counter • Zero Degree Calorimeter • Momentum Measurement • Drift Chamber • Pad Chamber • Electron identification • Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counter • Number of Fired PMT • Ring Shape • Ring center Matching • Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter • E-p matching • Position Matching

More Related