1 / 19

Diffusing Pedagogical and Technical Innovations: A Different Approach

Diffusing Pedagogical and Technical Innovations: A Different Approach. Lanny Arvan ( l-arvan@uiuc.edu ) R. Varkki George ( varkki@uiuc.edu ). Background. SCALE Renewal Grant Charged with delivering experiments that test methods and software for making ALN better

zea
Download Presentation

Diffusing Pedagogical and Technical Innovations: A Different Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Diffusing Pedagogical and Technical Innovations: A Different Approach Lanny Arvan (l-arvan@uiuc.edu) R. Varkki George (varkki@uiuc.edu)

  2. Background • SCALE Renewal Grant • Charged with delivering experiments that test methods and software for making ALN better • Easier to produce materials • Lower instructor time commitment • Improve student learning • Faculty Fellow • Promote diffusion; early adopter charged with the task

  3. Other Projects • NCSA Emerging Technology Class – • Adult learners and on-campus students mixed. • RiverWeb – • Mapping exercises for American History • Travel and Tourism – • Templates for student interns and sponsors • General Engineering – Remote robotics • Education – • Streaming Video of Student Presentations

  4. SCALE’s Writing Initiative • Campus does not support mainstream adoption • This is beginning to change • Writing intensive courses would benefit from ALN • Mainstream faculty work with a Faculty Fellow • $3,000 incentive for assistance or computing purchases

  5. Other Ideas Behind the Project • Target faculty who care about teaching • But who are novices with technology • Faculty mentor has more cachet than support staff • Questions • What are the impacts on target faculty? • How is this support best delivered?

  6. ALN and Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) • Writing promotes thinking and learning in the disciplines • Results: quality of the learning experience improves but logistics get very complex • ALN promotes written communication • ALN helps manage logistical complexity

  7. Program Setup • Numbers • 80 WAC participants contacted • 15 provided with details • 5 agreed to participate • Unable to participate because • Circumstances (not teaching; on leave) • Timing; Lack of time (schedule conflicts; other commitments)

  8. Intensive Weekly Consultations • Initial discussions of teaching objectives • Intros to technology and pedagogy; compatibility with objectives • Advice on implementation strategies and sequencing • Pointers to campus resources • Help with technical decisions and troubleshooting

  9. Technology and Pedagogy • Conferencing can be adapted for short, one-time, written assignments • Manageable peer review mechanism • Virtual portfolio for longer, staged assignments • Clarifies stages and sequence • Provides effective mechanism for assessment • http://vfolio.scale.uiuc.edu

  10. Outcomes I (Preliminary) • Adoption in a variety of courses • Civil Engineering, History, French, Latino/Latina Studies, Anthropology • Incremental implementations • Increasing campus support for mainstream adoption

  11. Outcomes I (Preliminary) • Measurement: • Comparison with other non-technical adopters • General quality-of-experience • Perceptions of complexity, compatibility, and relative advantage (Surry and Gustafson) • Source: E-mail conversations • Caveats • Small sample, short time frame

  12. Outcomes III (Preliminary)

  13. Self-Reflection • collegiality and individual attention were extremely valuable • Help with pacing of implementation was crucial • Timing is critical (during or outside the semester?) • 75% of my time was spent on logistics

  14. How Would We Do Things Differently? • Use a support team rather than one individual • More efficient use of resources • More holistic support • Foster better communication among participants • Build a better sense of community • Our experience with early adopters

More Related