1 / 17

Maine Law Court & the Criminal Law

Maine Law Court & the Criminal Law. DAG Bill Stokes, Chief, Criminal Division AAG Don Macomber, Criminal Division. Miranda & Voluntariness. Prescott Bragg Jones Nightingale Wiley. State v. Prescott, 2012 ME 96.

zeal
Download Presentation

Maine Law Court & the Criminal Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maine Law Court & the Criminal Law DAG Bill Stokes, Chief, Criminal Division AAG Don Macomber, Criminal Division

  2. Miranda & Voluntariness • Prescott • Bragg • Jones • Nightingale • Wiley

  3. State v. Prescott, 2012 ME 96 • Defendant who left scene of accident not “in custody” when questioned at her home • Defendant “in custody” when questioned at scene after officer told her she had to return with him

  4. State v. Bragg, 2012 ME 102 • Defendant questioned at scene of OUI stop not “in custody” • Officer’s telling defendant that her BAC was .13 and that legal limit in Maine was .08 was not “interrogation”

  5. State v. Jones, 2012 ME 126 • Juvenile defendant (17 ½) not “in custody” when questioned at hospital where his baby died • Also not “in custody” when questioned later that night in his apartment during scene re-creation • Also not “in custody” when questioned later that week at police station

  6. State v. Nightingale, 2012 ME 94 • Defendant not “in custody” during 9 hour polygraph interview at police station; statements voluntary • Invocation of right to counsel at end of interview did not preclude police from going to defendant’s mother’s house to interview defendant

  7. Nightingale • Non-deliberate failure to give Miranda warnings at mother’s house did not preclude admission of post-warning confession • Petition for certiorari filed as to whether “deliberate” Miranda violation, announced in Justice Kennedy concurring opinion, is proper standard; Supreme Court ordered response • Cert. denied in June 2013

  8. State v. Wiley, 2013 ME 30 • Defendant not “in custody” when questioned at police station about child sex offenses when he voluntarily went there and was told he was not under arrest • Defendant’s confession “involuntary” as primarily motivated by officer’s offer of short jail sentence and probation as alternative to lengthy prison sentence

  9. State v. Butsitsi, 2013 ME 2 • Defendant waived his privilege against self-incrimination by testifying on direct examination; State’s cross-examination question about gun was relevant • Trial court did not violate Maine Rule of Evidence 512 by instructing the jury that it could consider defendant’s refusal to answer the question despite court’s order to do so

  10. State v. Carr, 2012 ME 136 • New trial not warranted even though State inadvertently failed to turn over audio recording of defense eyewitness until after trial • Summary of interview provided before trial and recording did not materially differ from summary

  11. State v. Reese, 2013 ME 10 • Postconviction DNA motion for new trial properly denied despite unknown male DNA not belonging to defendant found on duct tape wrapped around victim’s wrists • Defense did not prove DNA was not product of contamination • Trial evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming

  12. State v. Hofland, 2012 ME 129 • State constitution does not provide right to hybrid/duel representation • Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel

  13. State v. Doloff, 2012 ME 130 • Prosecutor’s comment that she did not think bat used to attack victim was too heavy not obvious error • Prosecutor comment regarding her personal opinion of defendant’s credibility, while improper, was not obvious error • Prosecutor’s urging jury to “do justice” was improper, but not obvious error

  14. Pop Quiz: Who is this woman?

  15. The Zumba Queen

  16. State v. Strong, 2013 ME 21 • State had right to bring interlocutory appeal from trial court’s dismissal of 46 invasion of privacy counts • Trial court had right to consider facts alleged in State’s offer of proof, not just the indictment • Johns do not have reasonable expectation to be free from video surveillance when having sex with prostitute

  17. So remember:

More Related