1 / 17

UrbanSim at PSRC

UrbanSim at PSRC. UrbanSim Users Group April 29 th -May 1 st 2009. The last 16 months. Worked the edges of the models – adjustments and refinements, not major additions 1 st implementation of UrbanSim contains many ‘Good enough for now’ decisions ‘Wish list’ for next time around.

zinna
Download Presentation

UrbanSim at PSRC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UrbanSim at PSRC UrbanSim Users Group April 29th-May 1st 2009

  2. The last 16 months • Worked the edges of the models – adjustments and refinements, not major additions • 1st implementation of UrbanSim contains many ‘Good enough for now’ decisions • ‘Wish list’ for next time around

  3. The Challenges we encountered • Getting familiar with the models and software • Developer Model • Infill and redevelopment • Translating comp plans to constraints • Matching constraints and templates • Location Choice Models • Adds and edits to the specifications during validation • Balancing vacancy rates and HLCM results • Job capacity – turning buildings into cubicles • Future Year Land Use inputs and scenario changes • How best to make changes to constraints table - GIS or DB queries • Unplaced HHs, Jobs, and Development Capacity • We ran out of room…relaxed constraints to allow for sensitivity tests

  4. Validation Work • 2000-2006 validation provided framework for most of the adjustments & discoveries

  5. SQFT Change by Constraint and Reg Geog

  6. Summary of key changes by model

  7. Vacant Redevelopable Partially Vacant / Underutilized Parcels available to the Developer Model • Underutilized (Infill) • Function of current density versus zoned or comp plan density – started with 2.5 ratio threshold: • A 30,000 SQFT parcel has a single housing unit, a 1200 SQFT single-story ranch house. The existing density value is 1.45 DU/Acre – 43,560 SQFT/30,000 SQFT. • Current comp plan designation calls for a maximum of 4 DU/Acre – 4 / 1.45 = 2.75, exceeds 2.5 and therefore meets our criteria for under-developed. • Lot size of 4/DU per acre is 43,560/4 = 10,890 SQFT. This is applied to the housing unit’s building record in UrbanSim, leaving 30,000-10,890 = 19,110 SQFT as vacant land area . • Redevelopable • Valuation ratio – currently using improvement value (building value) over total value (land + building) • Currently using 0.33 as trigger for a redevelopable property 7

  8. Developer Model CalculationsExample 1 • Vacant Parcel # 1104255 - Arlington • 10,019 SQFT • 6 to 24 DU/Acre MF/Condo Only • Builds Condo building in 2030 with 4 units

  9. Developer Model CalculationsExample 2 • Vacant Parcel # 1047486 - Uninc. Snohomish County • 19,602 SQFT • 4 to 6 DU/Acre - SF and MF/Condo allowed • Builds 2 SF units in 2023

  10. Real Estate Price ModelResearch and Design Questions • What other variables should we be attempting to model? • Incorporate vacancy rates and allowable development (land use plan designation? • What travel measures to use? • Generalized Costs – most future year assumptions involve tolls • Continuous versus threshold measures • Separate models for land value, improvement value? • Different factors for each?

  11. Developer ModelsResearch and Design Questions for Project Sampling / Selection portion • How vacancy rates influence the market • Currently used as a ‘on/off’ switch – change to an adjustment to the expected return on investment? • Add ability to model cost incentives / disincentives on development by type, location • IE policy to encourage affordable housing in urban centers • Are the ROI values realistic? • Negative profits • Correct spread between higher density and lower density proposals on the same parcel?

  12. Developer ModelsResearch and Design Questions for Project Proposal portion • How to model comp plans? Strict versus loose • Should constraints degrade over time? • How to stock the development_templates table? • Historical patterns, future designs, mix? • Ensure templates match up with constraints • How best to flag parcels for infill and redevelopment • Varies among jurisdictions now for Buildable Lands program • Improvement value should be high enough to prevent parcel from re-entering the redevelopment cycle for period of time (the ‘recycled parcels’ issue) • Allow developer model to aggregate / disaggregate parcels • Bending reality in template lot size and maximum FAR for high-density areas

  13. The Wish List

  14. Examining Sensitivity to Transportation Plan / Accessibility Changes

  15. King County Pop Change 2000 to 2040: Each Alt compared to baseline

  16. Next 6-9 Months • Consolidation Phase • Install and test GUI, built-in synthesizer • Write some of this stuff down • Model Refinements • Tune infill assumptions • How model handles redevelopment (no ban) • Thorough 'price model' review and adjustments • Better relationship between cost of housing and HH income in HCLM aka 'affordable housing' • Rural Vested Lots / allow DU's on undersized parcels • Explore segmented or nested HLCM structure • Scale model improvements in ELCM • Cost incentive levers (instead of only DU, FAR constraints) • Updated Inputs • Future Year land use, Major planned developments, 2006 ‘Light’ base year • Use for forecast product • Model our Vision 2040 plan • Continue to support Transportation 2040 analysis • Grow comfort level with member jurisdictions

  17. Lessons learned so far • Pull on those threads…where there is smoke, there is fire…<choose your cliché> • Value of the validation cycle in uncovering needed model refinements • Troubleshooting takes time, error messages aren’t yet particularly helpful for non-programmers • Think multiple models & inputs • Example: What can be built on a parcel dependent on both the comp plan, and what templates UrbanSim can build given the parcel characteristics and comp plan translation • Code is fragile – update with care • Advantages of the parcel model • How development actually occurs – represent land economics • Modeling redevelopment, infill critical for representing GMA-related growth policies

More Related