1 / 21

Business and Society

Business and Society. Socio-Economic Theories of Sustainable Change. A Theory of Business Ethics beyond Risk Management. Business Ethics …. Why? Practical: some impressions Theoretical: the lack of regulative frameworks Businesses as drivers for sustainable change?

zinnia
Download Presentation

Business and Society

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Business and Society Socio-Economic Theories of Sustainable Change A Theory of Business Ethics beyond Risk Management

  2. Business Ethics … • Why? • Practical: some impressions • Theoretical: the lack of regulative frameworks • Businesses as drivers for sustainable change? • How? (contemporary concepts) • Theses: business ethics from an economic perspective • Antitheses: business ethics from an (discourse) ethical perspective • socio-economic perspective of business ethics: • not a syntheses of an economic and ethical approaches • critical social science perspective that opens “windows to possible worlds” (Giddens) • (1) questions “economic worlds” • (2) complementary to “impossible worlds” of ethical approaches

  3. Why Business Ethics?(Practical problems) • business scandals • business ethics and global problems • intragenerational justice (North-South) • intergenerational justice (future generations) systemic push towards more intra- and intergenerational justice (through businesses?)

  4. Why Business Ethics?(theoretical arguments) • Do we need businesses for business ethics? • Moral economics and the relevance of political regulations: • good games require more good rules than good players (Buchanan/ Brennan) • political regulations: necessary but not sufficient: • regulative frameworks are incomplete • regulative frameworks are merely reactive • the influence of the traditional national-state is increasinglylimited (globalization) • consequences: • social responsibility of businesses • business ethics is more than a supplement to moral economics

  5. Why Business Ethics?(businesses as “drivers for change”) • businesses are de facto drivers for change • can they also become drivers for sustainable change? • difficult, very difficult but not hopeless and • depending on other conditions

  6. Why? • How? (contemporary concepts) • Theses: business ethics from an economic perspective • Antitheses: business ethics from an (discourse) ethical perspective • socio-economic perspective of business ethics

  7. business ethics: an economic perspective • risk management • organizational improvement • market positioning • civil positioning * Economy Ethics

  8. business ethics: a (discourse) ethical perspective (1) • criticism of the utilitarian approaches of traditional economics and management • moral point of view as a critical position • theoretical status: regulative idea (not empirical facts) • transformation from an utilitarian to a communicative logic

  9. business ethics: a (discourse) ethical perspective (2) • Two levels of responsibility • Level 1: ethics of business • innovative synthesis between ethics and economics (teleological orientation) • principal of categorical self-binding through deontological values (responsible profit-seeking; not profit-maximization) • Level 2: republican idea of business ethics • ordoliberal commitment (arrangement of the political framework) • critical public (as community of all citizens) is the authority of just businesses practices

  10. contemporary business ethics: a criticism • (discourse) ethical perspective: • explication of the moral point of view as impossible worlds • normative orientations are necessary! • focus on “ideal communication communities” • neglecting “real communication communities” • chance of realization: about zero • economic perspective: • no normative orientation • argumentation within the economic paradigm • based on a specific understanding of “economic worlds” • helpful perspective but just one possible standpoint and not the objectively-given truth

  11. business ethics: a socio-economic perspective (1) • general idea: • not impossible worlds • not economic worlds • possible worlds • critical social science approach • critical in the sense that the social scientist tries to develop new visions of social reality • social sciences as hunters of myths (Elias) • especially economical myths

  12. 4 modern myths • Myth 1: individuals act according to the principle of utility maximization(theory of action) • Myth 2: organization are rational entities; businesses merely speak and understand the language of profit (maximization) (organizational theory) • Myth 3: institutions are the result of rational decisions or they are the result of an evolutionary process of natural selection (institutional theory) • Myth 4: the economic system is an autonomous societal sphere (system theory/ theory of spheres of values).

  13. other myths economic perspective socio-economic perspective interpretative theory of action utility maximization • Myth 1(actions) • Myth 2(orga.) • Myth 3(inst.) • Myth 4(system/sphere) multilingual actors rational entities (profits) cultural science paradigm natural science paradigm institutions as symbolic orders optimal institutions conflicts between spheres of values autonomous system

  14. M1: interpretative theory of action • interpretative: • not objectively-given situations (logic of the situation) but • definition of the situation through the actor • perspective of the actors ≠ perspective of the observer • cognitive frames, scripts of actions, routines • relevant theories: • Interpretative Sociology (Weber, Schütz, Berger/ Luckmann et al.) • New Economic Sociology (Granovetter et al.) • Evolutionary Economics (Nelson/ Winter, Witt et al.)

  15. M 2 & 3: multilingual actorsand institutions as symbolic orders (1) • What are institutions? • institutions guide our action • shared meanings that enable free individuals to coordinate their actions • reduce uncertain while they help to frame situations • Institutions are relevant: • intraorganisational • interorganisational Next week: “Institutionalization of Sustainability. A Theoretical Framework and some Empirical Results” (same time, same place)

  16. M 2 & 3: multilingual actorsand institutions as symbolic orders (2) (1) intraorganisational: • profit-seeking is the leading modus of businesses but not the only one (Wieland; transactions cost economics) • businesses also communicate in terms of law, politics, morality (ontological argument); • businesses are multilingual actors • morality is in principal available in business but not necessarily applicable forms • consequences: foster forms of application of morality • institutional level: • clear values, such as codes of conduct (stabilization)

  17. M 2 & 3: multilingual actorsand institutions as symbolic orders (3) (2) intraorganisational: • explicit and implicit knowledge in businesses is crucial • businesses as bundle of individual competences and routines • evolutionary economics and organizational learning literature • consequences on two levels: • Individual level: • moral competences • institutional level: • institutional arrangements enable (moral) learning processes (sustainable change)

  18. M 2 & 3: multilingual actorsand institutions as symbolic orders (4) intraorganisational: • (1): stabilization of values • (2): learning processes and sustainable change • Balance!

  19. M 4: conflicts between spheres of values • the economic system has its own logic (Eigengesetzlichkeiten, Max Weber); however its is not an autonomous sphere • economic theories neglect the relation to other spheres (Religion, Politics, Science, Medias, Art etc.) • focus on the tensions and conflicts between different spheres is necessary • theories of societal differentiation are relevant • Weber: (theory of spheres of values) • geneses of institutions • Luhmann: (system theory) • organizations as mediators between different spheres • organizations as origin of change

  20. Summary • “economic worlds” are seen as a possible worlds; however, it is merely one possible storywe can tell • socio-economic perspective hunts economic myths and tries to tell another story • questions certain assumptions of economic theories • develops “possible worlds” based on: • theory of action, • organizational and institutional theory • theory of spheres of values • develops another “how it is” or “how we can see it” • complementary to “impossible worlds” of ethical approaches • Linkage between possible and impossible worlds: still open

More Related