1 / 33

Is conservative management effective in Emphysematous Pyelonephritis?

Is conservative management effective in Emphysematous Pyelonephritis?. Vijay Anand, Vineet, Sridharan, Venkat Ramanan, Sunil Shroff, M.G.Rajamanickam. Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, SRMC & RI. Emphysematous pyelonephritis.

zody
Download Presentation

Is conservative management effective in Emphysematous Pyelonephritis?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Is conservative management effective in Emphysematous Pyelonephritis? Vijay Anand, Vineet, Sridharan, Venkat Ramanan, Sunil Shroff, M.G.Rajamanickam. Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, SRMC & RI.

  2. Emphysematous pyelonephritis • Acute necrotizing parenchymal and perirenal infection caused by gas forming organisms. • High morbidity & poor prognosis. • Rate of Nephrectomy: 21-29% • Mortality rate: 60-75%

  3. AIM • To analyze the efficacy of conservative management in EPN.

  4. Methods • Retrospective study • Inclusion criteria: All patients of EPN managed in our centre in the last three years. • Diagnosis of EPN: Based on clinical and radiological findings • The risk factors and classification done based on study by Wan et al * Correlation between imaging finding & clinical outcome ; Liang Wan, Tze u lee ; Radiology 1996; 198: 433-438

  5. Classification according to extent of involvement • Class I : Renal pelvis • Class II : Renal parenchyma • Class III A : Perinephric tissue B : Beyond Gerota’s fascia. • Class IV : Bilateral involvement EPN in solitary kidney

  6. Radiological Classification • Type I – Parenchymal destruction, absence of fluid collections and presence of mottled gas (Dry type) – Mortality : 69% • Type II – Renal or perirenal collections with bubbly or loculated gas or gas in collecting system. (Wet type) Mortality : 18% • Wan et al 1996, Best et al 1999

  7. Risk factors • Thrombocytopenia • Acute renal insufficiency • Low S. Albumin • Altered mental status • Shock on presentation AUA, 2005 More than 2 risk factors – Poorer prognosis

  8. Conservative Management in EPN • Antibiotics • Supportive measures • Stenting / Per-cutaneous drainage Indications • Rising S.Creatinine • Hydroureteronephrosis • Sepsis • Significant renal or peri-renal collection (Percutaneous drainage)

  9. Results • Total # of patients : 18 • Male : Female : 1: 2 (6 M, 12 F) • Age : 34-67yrs (mean 51).

  10. Patient categorization • Class 1 - 5 patients • Class 2 - 4 patients • Class 3A - 6 patients • Class 3B - 1 patients • Class 4 - 2 patients

  11. Class 1

  12. Class 2

  13. Class 3A

  14. Class 3B

  15. Class 3B

  16. Class IV

  17. Class IV

  18. Radiological types • Dry Type : 4 • Wet Type : 14

  19. Type I - gas radiates diffusely No associated fluid collections are seen Type II - several small foci of gas Associated regions of fluid attenuation.

  20. Risk Factors • Low S. Albumin – 18 • Acute renal insufficiency : 16 • Thrombocytopenia: 11 • Altered mental status - 3 • Shock on presentation - 2

  21. Co-existing Diabetes Mellitus • No. of pts with DM: 18 Established DM 16 Incidentally diagnosed 2 • Hb A1c raised ( mean – 12.2)

  22. Causative organisms Esch. coli : 12 Klebsiella : 2 Citrobacter : 1 No growth : 3

  23. Management • DJ Stenting – 11 • DJ Stent+Percutaneous drainage – 3 • Percutaneous drainage – 2 • Nephrectomy - 1

  24. Pre and Post Stenting

  25. Pre & post per cutaneous drainage

  26. Management vs Class of EPN

  27. Management & Class of EPN

  28. Management vs Number of Risk factors

  29. Mortality - 1 • Class 3B • Radiological type – I • Number of risk factors – 5 • Outcome – expired within few hours

  30. Effectiveness of Conservative management • Risk factor > 2 - 9/16 patients • Patients with class 3A, 3B, 4 – 7/16 patients

  31. Follow up • Follow up – 3 months to 24 months Mean – 6 months • Recurrent EPN @ 3months - 1 • Pyelonephritis (Non emphysematous) - 1

  32. Conclusion Conservative management is a safe, effective and feasible treatment option in patients with Emphysematous pyelonephritis.

  33. Thank you

More Related