E N D
1. An Algorithmic Approach to UGI Bleeding Glenn M. Eisen, et al.
Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53(7): 853-859
presented by Ri???
2. UGI Bleeding A common medical presentation
Endoscopy: an important early intervention
Early endoscopy:
Reduce adverse outcomes
Choose appropriate care to prevent rebleeding
Lee JG, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50(6): 755-61
3. Initial evaluation (1) Possible etiology of bleeding
Peptic ulcer, Mallory-Weiss tears, esophagitis, esophageal/gastric varices
Morbidity/mortality associated with varices: still high, need timely therapeutic intervention
Complicating factors
Age, use of anticoagulants, coagulatory diseases, NASID use
4. Initial evaluation (2) Source of bleeding: upper or lower
NG tube: help in identifying the source
Lavage: allow the stomach to be cleared of blood
Extent of blood loss
Orthostatic changes in BP: significant volume depletion, need prompt resuscitation
5. Management Acid suppression therapy
Pre-endoscopy risk assessment
Endoscopy
Actively bleeding ulcers, ulcers with nonbleeding visible ulcers
6. Acid Suppression Therapy (1) IV H2 blocker alone: no significant improvement on short-term outcomes, e.g. rebleeding rates
Collins R, et al. NEJM, 1985; 313: 660-6
Maintenance use of H2 blocker after ulcer healing: long-term rebleeding rates are reduced.
Jensen DM, et al. NEJM, 1994; 330(6): 382-6
Successful H. pylori eradication: reduce long-term rebleeding rates
Laine LA. Am J Med 1996; 100(5A): 52S-57S
7. Acid Suppression (2): PPI use Omeprazole PO in pts who did not receive endoscopic therapy:
The need for surgery and transfusion: lower
No significant change in mortality
Khuroo MS, et al. NEJM 1997; 336(15): 1054-8
Omeprazole IV in pts who had receive endoscopic therapy:
Recurrent bleeding rates: 6.7% vs. 22.5%
No difference in surgical procedures or mortality
Lau JY, et al. NEJM 2000; 343(5): 310-6
8. Acid Suppression Therapy (3) Summary
It may play an adjunctive role in short-term management of pts with UGI bleeding
It should NOT be the ONLY intervention!!
9. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (1) Definition of “early” endoscopy
A significant controversy
In general: within 24 hrs of presentation
Emergent endoscopy
For pts who are hemodynamically unstable
Improve short-term morbidity/mortality
10. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (2) Parameters of risk assessment
Clinical signs: shock, massive hemorrhage
Endoscopic findings: an important guide to predict the risk of rebleeding and the appropriate setting for post-endoscopic management
Establishment of scoring systems
11. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (3) Clinical & endoscopic data are both used: identifying pts at low risk for rebleeding and who can be managed in an outpatient setting.
Longstreth GF, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47(3): 219-22
4 variables (hemodynamics, time from bleeding, comorbidity, endoscopic finding): reduce hospital LOS in low-risk pts from 4.6 days to 2.9 days
Hay JA, et al. JAMA 1997; 278(24): 2151-6
12. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (4) Summary--benefit of risk assessment:
Shorter hospital length of stay
Reduction in cost of care
Common predictors of rebleeding
Older age
Hemodynamic instability
Comorbid disease (e.g. CAD, CHF, CRI)
Anticoagulants use/ coagulopathy
Specific endoscopic findings (e.g. malignancy)
High-risk lesion in scope (e.g. arterial bleeding)
13. Endoscopy (1) Hemostatic techniques:
Laser: limited use, expensive cost
Thermal contact: widely available, obvious reduction in adverse outcomes
Injection therapy: epinephrine and sclerosant solutions, easily use
Complications: perforation, worsening of bleeding
14. Endoscopy (2) A net benefit in the management of pts with high-risk lesions
Improved medical outcomes with therapeutic endoscopic interventions ?significantly lower healthcare costs
Gralnek IM, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46(2): 105-12
15. Endoscopy (3): special conditions Esophageal or gastric varices: sclerosis or banding
AVM, Mallory-Weiss tears: electrocautery with or without epinephrine and/or sclerosants
Peptic ulcers: a test for H. pylori ? positive H. pylori eradication reduces long-term rate of rebleeding.
16. Actively bleeding ulcers (1) Actively bleeding ulcers & ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels:
Seen in up to 35% of pts with ulcers at the time of endoscopy
Greatest risk of poor outcomes and rebleeding
Rollhauser C, et al. Endoscopy 1999; 31(1): 17-25
17. Actively bleeding ulcers (2) Endoscopic therapies:
Injeciton of epinephrine and/or sclerosants, electrocautery, heater probe
Reduction in rebleeding rates
After endoscopy:
Observation in acute care setting
Rebleeding can occur in up to 20% of pts, within 48-72 hrs.
Saeed ZA, et al. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 288-94
18. Actively bleeding ulcers (3) If rebleeding occurs:
Repeat endoscopy, angiography, surgery
Lau JYW, et al. (1999):
48 pts undergoing endoscopic retreatment vs. 44 pts receiving surgery
35 of 48 pts had long-term control of bleeding (73%).
13 of 48 pts the need for surgery and was associated with fewer complications.
Lau JYW, et al. NEJM 1999; 340: 751-6
19. Actively bleeding ulcers (4) Ulcers with overlying clots:
Removal of the clot may be beneficial.
It can be removed by simple irrigation, to expose the underlying ulcer bases.
Laine L, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43(2): 107-10
22. Thank You for Your Attention 93/01/23