1 / 10

Infection Prevention Assessment Visits

Infection Prevention Assessment Visits. Jane Thornell RN, CIC Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Central Line Measures. Many programs are excited about their rates! Majority of programs have process checklists in place.

Anita
Download Presentation

Infection Prevention Assessment Visits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Infection Prevention Assessment Visits Jane Thornell RN, CIC Massachusetts Department of Public Health

  2. Central Line Measures • Many programs are excited about their rates! • Majority of programs have process checklists in place. • Some had been tracking compliance of “bundle” data for some time. • Many ICU/CCU’s have a dedicated Line Cart or an all inclusive insertion kit. • Many programs have identified alternate resources to aid in summary (denominator) data collection i.e. extenders, clinical resources, automated counts. • Several programs began using device days as of July 1st 2008

  3. VAP Process measures • Majority of programs have process checklists in place. • Some had been tracking compliance of “bundle” data for some time. • All speak of difficulty with NHSN VAP definition and the lively discussions that ensue with the intensivists over this measure! • NHSN provides the “Attachment A” for surveillance purposes

  4. Hand Hygiene • Variable rates of compliance • Data collection is challenging • Clever, economical and memorable approaches to improve Hand Hygiene compliance • Hand Stations are very visible • Programs struggle to keep the approaches fresh, new, and to involve staff (see the Monograph!) • Monitors include direct observations, product volume, surveys of patient satisfaction results

  5. Program Opportunities • Environment of Care: -Antiquated buildings to “state of the art” facilities -Immaculate to very tired looking environments -Challenging, mixed use, or inadequate storage to central core supply stations and “Nurse Servers” Equipment Cleaning: -Inconsistent or non-existent systems for identifying cleaned “rolling stock” equipment

  6. Compliance with Sharps Safety - Approximately 60% found to have non-safety products readily available -2000 Massachusetts law (HB 5794) that requires ‘the use, at all acute and non-acute hospitals of only such devices which minimize the risk of injury to health care workers from needle sticks and sharps. ” -New waiver procedure for select items

  7. Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) Pre-construction -Someprograms reportinconsistent notification of projects -Shaded the floor plan to indicate sensitive areas for project managers Education in Infection Prevention Standards -Many programs do not include Hospitalists in Infection Control and Prevention orientation

  8. NHSN Reporting • Keeping up two surveillance systems • NHSN support staff is “responsive” • Many programs entering individual surgical procedures manually! • Some confusion in entering events • Data Management varies widely

  9. Few programs meet Expert Panel recommendations for staffing. Numerous programs with 1 ICP operation Limited, if any, discretionary funds for IP’s. Many IP’s with a variety of additional roles Universal concern with decreasing visibility of Infection Preventionists Numerous hospitals in “right sizing” “re-engineering” mode Infection Preventionist Extraordinary professionals!

More Related