1 / 52

Evolution: An Idea in Three Parts

Evolution: An Idea in Three Parts. Part one:. The Organic Origins Debate and the “Darwin Wars”. Defining the Period. Simplification of the Victorian era: Prudish Sexist Racist Science vs. Revealed & Natural religion. Defining the Problem. Extinction Catastrophism vs. Uniformatism:

Audrey
Download Presentation

Evolution: An Idea in Three Parts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution: An Idea in Three Parts

  2. Part one: The Organic Origins Debate and the “Darwin Wars”

  3. Defining the Period • Simplification of the Victorian era: • Prudish • Sexist • Racist • Science vs. Revealed & Natural religion

  4. Defining the Problem • Extinction • Catastrophism vs. Uniformatism: • Earth was created by a series of rapid, catastrophic events • Earth was created through slow, naturally occurring processes • Introduction of new species in foreign environments

  5. The Argument from Design (1) • Many things in this world do not appear to be accidents, but seem “designed” • A discovered watch demonstrates design • To be designed, there must be a Designer

  6. The Argument from Design (2) • David Hume: • Scathing critique of the argument from design by extending the argument to its logical conclusions • Infinite regress of intelligent designers, intelligence as a “superior” function • Nonetheless, design still prevailed...

  7. The Evolutionists • Erasmus Darwin • Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire • Jean Baptiste de Lamarck • Robert Chambers • Charles Lyell (?) • Joseph Dalton Hooker

  8. The Critics • Georges Cuvier • John F. W. Herschel • William Whewell • Rev. Adam Sedgwick • Hugh Miller • St. George Jackson Mivart

  9. Charles Robert Darwin • Well-off • Not originally a good student • Specialised in Geology • Researched in the Galápagos

  10. Alfred Russell Wallace • Humble beginnings • Amateur collector of specimens • Lost virtually all of his collection in a fire • He may have been an evolutionist because he was not an academic

  11. Richard Owen • Comparative anatomist • Darwin & Huxley were originally indebted to him • Developed a theory of Archetypes and introduced the term Homology to biology

  12. Thomas Henry Huxley • Modest family background, supported by scholarship in medical school • “Darwin’s Bulldog,” vicious critic of others • Persuaded by evolutionary thinking • Destroyed Owen’s Archetypal theory

  13. Social Darwinism & Eugenics • Inspired by the works of Spencer & Galton • Committed several logical errors: • Naturalistic fallacy • Genetic determinism • Progression • Led to sterilizations, discrimination

  14. Fast-Forward: Sociobiology (1) • In the 1960s and 1970s • Attempted to apply selectionist thinking to animal behaviour • E.O. Wilson and Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, final chapter on humans

  15. Fast-Forward: Sociobiology (2) • Vitriolic reaction • Criticisms of sociobiological analyses: • genetic determinism • racism • sexism • The question remains whether these criticisms actually hold up to scrutiny

  16. Part two: Evolutionary Theory

  17. Lamarckian Evolution (1) • Acquired characteristics & satisfaction of needs • Saltationist • Scala Naturae: • Organisms move progressively up evolutionary scale, with irregularities • Multiple concurrent phylogenetic lines

  18. Lamarckian Evolution (2) a b c d a’ b c Ø a a’ b Ø a a’ Ø a Ø Adapted from Ruse (1999)

  19. Lamarckian Evolution (3) • Problems: • Poor mechanism for speciation • Lacking a model of inheritance • No evidence of spontaneous generation • No evidence of spontaneous speciation • Does not follow the fossil record (though he never claimed it did)

  20. Darwinian Evolution (1) • Influences: • Malthus and struggle for survival • Lyellian uniformitarianism • Animal breeding • Varieties & species of the Galápagos

  21. Darwinian Evolution (2) • “Descent with modification” • Gradual adaptation to environment • Variation, inheritance, & differential reproduction • Common descent

  22. Darwinian Evolution (3) a b c d a’ Adapted from Ruse (1999) Ø

  23. Darwinian Evolution (4) • Types of selection: • Natural • Sexual • Artificial • Pangenesis model of inheritance: • Gemmules • Blended • Acquired

  24. Darwinian Evolution (5) • Problems: • Blended inheritance • Acquired characteristics • Geological time scale for selection (lack of scientific knowledge of the time) • Mate choice and sexual selection (not well accepted at the time)

  25. Mendelian Genetics • Gregor Mendel, an Austrian monk, was the discoverer of the basis of heredity • Ignored in Darwin’s time (and by Darwin himself!) • Solved the problem of inheritance by demonstrating that it was particulate in nature, not “blended”

  26. The Modern Synthesis • Until the 1930s, Lamarckianism was the most commonly accepted theory • The foundations of the modern synthesis, based on Darwin’s model, were laid by several key biologists: • Ronald Fisher • Sewall Wright • J.B.S. Haldane

  27. Fitness • The relative number of surviving offspring • More particularly: • the extent to which copies of an individual’s genotype are present in succeeding generations, relative to other genotypes • Does not refer to physical well-being or degree of adaptation to the environment

  28. Adaptation (1) • An idiosyncrasy of structure, physiology, or behaviour that aids an organism in its environment • Environments are both physical (e.g., ecosystem) and biological (other organisms)

  29. Adaptation (2) • A slow process over many generations • Environmentally-specific • Adaptations may be out-of-date • Cumulative

  30. Natural Selection • Differential rate of reproduction and survival of different genotypes in a population • Responsible for adaptation to environment by selecting complete phenotypes • Selects & maintains adaptations

  31. Types of Selection (1) μø • Stabilising: • Always taking place • Eliminates extreme individuals in a population μn

  32. Types of Selection (2) μø • Disruptive: • Increases extreme forms in a population at the expense of intermediate ones • Responsible for “group” differences (e.g., males vs. females) μn

  33. Types of Selection (3) μø • Directional: • Increases one extreme form at the expense of other forms in the population • Generally responsible for speciation μn

  34. Types of Selection (4) • Frequency-dependent: • Acts on multiple phenotypes in a population • Works by decreasing more common types and increasing less common types, due to intra-typical competition • This continues until an equilibrium of sorts is reached

  35. Types of Selection (5)* • Sexual Selection: • Darwin originally conceived of Sexual Selection as a mechanism separate from, but complementary to, NS: • Referred to selection through competition for reproduction • However, since NS now encompasses bothsurvival and reproduction, SS is now seen as a fifth type of NS

  36. Sexual Selection • Definition: • Differential rate of reproduction of different genotypes in a population in the context of mating • Types of mating contexts: • Intersexual • Intrasexual

  37. Part three: The Philosophy of Evolutionary Theory

  38. Levels of Causation • Proximate causation: • “How?” questions • Explains how a mechanism works • Ultimate causation: • “Why?” questions • Explains why a mechanism exists and what function it serves

  39. Levels of Selection (1) • “Good of the species” thinking is outdated • Inclusive Fitness (Kin Selection) theory: • Fitness is based on the adaptiveness of a gene in an organism and copies of that gene in related organisms

  40. Levels of Selection (2) • The Price Equation (equivalence principle): • Mathematical formulation for evolutionary change • Allows one to solve complex evolutionary problems using different levels of selection • Arguments are now being made to utilise multi-level selectionist thinking

  41. The Calculus of Selection • Selection operates on the basis of costs & benefits • r-K selection: • r = rapid and large production of offspring, short lifespan • K = slow and small production of offspring, long lifespan • Predicted by stability of environment (.e.g, safety of offspring)

  42. The Problem of Fitness • Spencer’s quote, “survival of the fittest,” is misleading • Survival is important only insofar that it helps to increase fitness • Fitness is measured only in reproductive terms: • relative number of copies of a genotype in succeeding populations

  43. OGOD Hypothesis • “One Gene, One Disorder” thinking is also outdated • Although the phenomenon of OGOD does take place in certain circumstances, most behaviour is multiply-caused

  44. Evolution and Deism • Evolutionary theory does not discredit belief in God, per se • It does, however, counter literal readings of any major religious text • Science is a philosophical model that does not subscribe to supernatural circumstances in order to explain phenomena

  45. The Naturalistic Fallacy (1) • “It is demonstrated… that things cannot be otherwise: for, since everything was made for a purpose, everything is necessarily for the best purpose. Note that noses were made to wear spectacles; we therefore have spectacles.” -Dr. Pangloss, from Voltaire’s Candide

  46. The Naturalistic Fallacy (2) • The confusion of an “is” statement with an “ought” statement • Scientific descriptions of the natural world cannot tell us what ought to be, only what is • We, as a people, are responsible for defining out morals and ethical practices, regardless of our ancestral heritage

  47. Progress & Foresight • Lamarck incorrectly envisioned evolution as a ladder, with humans on top • Selection works on short-term consequences • Selection has no foresight • As Darwin said, “It is absurd to talk of one animal being higher than another” (Species Notebook B)

  48. Genetic Determinism • The idea that genes alone are necessary and sufficient causes for all behaviour • A major criticism of evolutionary research applied to humans: • Fueled the “nature-nurture” debate • However, very little modern-day evolutionary research is genetically deterministic

  49. The Wrap-Up (1) • Part one: History • The problem of organic origins • The flaws of the Argument from Design • The evolutionists and their critics • Social Darwinism & Eugenics • The “Darwin Wars” and Sociobiology

  50. The Wrap-Up (2) • Part two: Evolutionary theory • Lamarckian vs. Darwinian theory • Mendelian genetics and particulate inheritance • The Modern Synthesis: • Adaptation • Fitness • Five types of Natural Selection

More Related