1 / 13

The Future of the Human Machine: Emotions

The Future of the Human Machine: Emotions. Timo Airaksinen Philosophy University of Helsinki. The source. This presentation is based on my book: ”Ihmiskoneen tulevaisuus” (The Future of the Human Machine), in Finnish, WSOY 2005). Anti-dualism.

Audrey
Download Presentation

The Future of the Human Machine: Emotions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Future of the Human Machine: Emotions Timo Airaksinen Philosophy University of Helsinki

  2. The source This presentation is based on my book: ”Ihmiskoneen tulevaisuus” (The Future of the Human Machine), in Finnish, WSOY 2005).

  3. Anti-dualism • I want to argue that humans are machines and that the post-human world can be understood accordingly. • This goes against religious dualism: mind and body, soul and matter. In other words: mind is soul and body is matter. • I don’t know if body is matter, but if a human being is a machine, he/she cannot have a soul.

  4. Two types of machines • Therefore, the human future is that of machines. We are now discussing technological matters. • Natural machines and technological (man made) machines are possible. • Before technology develops, we cannot say what a human being is. We miss a crucial, defining metaphor, and later a simile (analogue) and identification.

  5. History of ideas • La Mettrie said that “man is a machine” (17??). • This was truly scandalous. • What was his argument like? • What could the argument for this type of a claim be like?

  6. Cyborgs and androids • The argument is: -the artificial machine works (Turing test) -everything can be explained scientifically (how it works) -analogous technological machines can be found or created. • This is to say that a technological human being is possible. • Let us call it “cyborg” or “android”.

  7. Why analogy? • The post-human androids must be somehow analogous to natural humans, if they are going to have emotions. • These machines cannot just produce the same results as the humans do.

  8. Four difficulties • Four difficulties exist: -Moral (we love our genetic heritage) -Motion (difficult to replicate) -Meaning (Searle’s “Chinese Room”) -Emotions • Cognitions are easier.

  9. Definition of emotions • Let us discuss emotions: -think of Moravec’s suggestion -where does he put emotions? -the minimal def. of emotions: -bodily component -feeling tone -belief (cognitive component) -social significance

  10. Problems • All these present special problems: -an emotion needs its body (this can be made) -body/brain needs (self) consciousness (these processes present a conceptual riddle) -cognitions are essential (we have AI) -emotions are shared (androids need a community)

  11. New emotions • In an android community emotions are typical of their community and its life. • These emotions are not necessary the same we (people in this room) typically experience (Rodney Brooks, 2002). • Moravec’s suggestion cannot work: one box is not enough!

  12. Max and min cases • Notice that Max and Min case exists: -Min: cyborgs are just tech-modified humans -Max: androids are fully tech-created and artificial • I want to discuss the Max-case.

  13. Conclusion -We will experience cyborgs and androids in the future. -But they will be different from us, e.g. emotionally. -Then the future world will not be fully human, although it is “human”. -This is also to say that use of the term “post -human” is justified. The human world will be different in the future, but not wholly.

More Related