100 likes | 182 Views
What is your intent in beginning a doctoral program? How does this intent fit the scholar/practitioner/leader mode?<br>As doctoral learners, you have a new responsibility to yourself and those around you; what is this responsibility?<br>What are the shared values of the doctoral community? How are these values related to leadership behavior?<br>
E N D
COM 705 TUTORS Education Expert/com705tutorsdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.com705tutors.com
COM 705 Week 1 DQs (UOP) • What is your intent in beginning a doctoral program? How does this intent fit the scholar/practitioner/leader mode? • As doctoral learners, you have a new responsibility to yourself and those around you; what is this responsibility? • What are the shared values of the doctoral community? How are these values related to leadership behavior?
COM 705 Week 1 Individual Assignment Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership Essay (UOP) • • Resources: SPL Essay Grading Rubric located in the Week One Materials section of the student website. • • Review the Electronic Readings Reserve (ERR) articles and the Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership essay grading rubric on the COM/705 course page. • • Write a 700- to 1050-word paper explaining how information literacy influences scholarship, practice, and leadership in a specific profession or discipline. • • Include the following components in your paper: • o Four sources – You must incorporate in-text citations and references from the three assigned ERR articles and one additional peer-reviewed source of your choice. Use the authors’ viewpoints to develop your argument. Please do not merely summarize the sources. Instead, use the sources to support your analysis of the assigned topics.
COM 705 Week 2 DQs (UOP) • How do you respond to constructive feedback? What does the ability to receive and integrate feedback say about you as a scholar/practitioner/leader? • What is the difference between summarizing and critically analyzing a text? Assess the quality of your critical analysis in your Week One paper. • Reflect on the feedback from your Week One paper. Based on this feedback, what general strategies would you put in place to help you develop as a scholar? (You will identify specific strategies on your Week Two Revision Matrix.)
COM 705 Week 2 Individual Assignment Annotated Bibliography (UOP) • An annotated bibliography is a reference list in which each entry is followed by an annotation or description of the source. • Resources: Annotated Bibliography Formatting Sample and University Library—both available in the Week Two Materials section of the student webpage. • Important! For the Annotated Bibliography assignment, you must: • Use the same format as the Annotated Bibliography Formatting Sample in the Week Two Materials section of the COM/705 course page. You may lose points for failing to the use the correct format. • Include an APA-formatted title page. • Include four sources (one from each database listed below). • Include a 1-paragraph annotation in your own words for each source.
COM 705 Week 2 Individual Assignment Revision Matrix (UOP) • Resources: Revision Matrix Template located in the Week Two Materials section of the student website. • Review your facilitator’s feedback comments on the Week One essay. • Complete the revision matrix as follows: • In the first column, copy/paste each facilitator feedback comment from your graded essay. Include feedback comments that your facilitator inserted in colored text in the body of the paper and/or numbered comments in the margin or at the bottom of the screen (depending on how the facilitator formatted the comments). If the facilitator made the same comment multiple times, you can include the comment once, but you should indicate how many times the facilitator made the comment. For numbered comments, include the comment number(s). • In the second column, accurately put each facilitator comment in your own words.
COM 705 Week 3 Assignment Team Effectiveness Presentation (UOP) • Resources: SPL Essay Grading Rubric located in the Week Three Materials section of the student website. • Develop a 10-15 slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that describes strategies of effective teams. Include the following: • At least three sources from the University Library. • Detailed speaker notes using the Notes function in Microsoft® PowerPoint® (To view the speaker notes, click on View on the PowerPoint toolbar, then select Notes Page). The purpose of the speaker notes is to provide elaboration and substantiation of the bulleted material presented on the slides. • Proper APA in-text citations on the slides and in the speaker notes. • An APA reference slide. • Select one team member submit the Team Effectiveness Presentation as a Microsoft® PowerPoint®attachment to the Assignments page.
COM 705 Week 3 DQs (UOP) • What are the purposes of scholarly writing? What are the key components of scholarly writing, and how do the components help achieve the purpose? • Identify three actions you have taken within your team, and evaluate the effectiveness of these actions using appropriate research. • How has your understanding of the scholar-practitioner-leader model changed since the start of the course? What specific actions will you take in the near future to develop as a scholar-practitioner-leader? How will your desired growth fit the statements you made in your letter of intent?
COM 705 Week 3 Individual Assignment Revised Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership Essay (UOP) • Resources: Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership essay grading rubric located in the Week Three Materials section of the student website. • • Revise your Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership essay by implementing the faculty feedback from your first paper and the improvement strategies from your Week Two Revision Matrix. • • Review the Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership essay grading rubric, and make additional revisions to your paper to meet the assignment criteria. The goal of the rewrite is to demonstrate your ability to improve your scholarly writing by using facilitator feedback, self-improvement strategies, and writing tools (rubric, APA manual, etc.). • Note: Failure to integrate facilitator feedback may result in significant point deductions.
COM 705 TUTORS Education Expert/com705tutorsdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.com705tutors.com