Significance Vis-À-Vis Repercussions of Non-Appointment of Company Secretary

1. Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Significance Vis-À-Vis Repercussions of Non-Appointment of Company Secretary Company secretaries are the natural conscience keepers for the corporate sector since they are specialists in the fields of corporate governance, regulation and processes and are the eyes and ears of the Board on such matters. The Companies Act has strengthened the role and position of the company secretaries. In particular, it considers a company secretary as key managerial personnel. As per Section 2(24) of The Companies Act 2013, ‘company secretary’ or ‘secretary’ means a company secretary as defined in clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980, who is appointed by a company to perform the functions of a company secretary under this Act. WHO IS REQUIRED TO APPOINT THE COMPANY SECRETARY? As per Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 8 & Rule 8A of The Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the following entities shall have Whole-time Company Secretary as Key Managerial personnel (KMP) 1.Every listed company and 2.Every other Public Company or Private Company having a paid-up share capital of ten crore rupees or more. FUNCTIONS OF COMPANY SECRETARY Section 205 of the Companies Act, 2013 states the functions of Company Secretary. The functions of Company Secretary shall include:- 1.To report to the Board about compliance with the provisions of this Act, the rules made thereunder and other laws applicable to the company; 2.To ensure that the company complies with the applicable secretarial standards; 3.To discharge such other duties as may be prescribed. PENALTY FOR NON-APPOINTMENT OF COMPANY SECRETARY Section 205(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that if any company makes any default in complying with the appointment of a Company Secretary, such company shall be liable 1.To a penalty of five lakh rupees and 2.Every director and key managerial personnel of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees and where the default is a continuing one, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first day during which such default continues but not exceeding five lakh rupees. CS Tanvi Shah| Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. | Website - www.affluence.net.in |Email - connect@affluence.net.in

2. Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Significance Vis-À-Vis Repercussions of Non-Appointment of Company Secretary CASELAWS: M/s First Data (India) Private Limited M/s First Data (India) Private Limited (“The Company”) filed a suo-moto application for adjudication of violation of provisions of Section 203 of Companies Act, 2013. The Company was required to appoint a Company Secretary on 24th October 2014 only. However, the Company failed to appoint the Company Secretary till 4th May 2020. Thereafter, they delayed the appointment. The adjudicating officer stated that the period of default from 24.10.2014 to 01.11.2018 is compoundable in nature and the period 02.11.2018 to 03.05.2020 shall be taken up for non- compliance of provisions of section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013. The following penalty was imposed on the Company and every Director and Key Managerial Personnel of the Company Person on whom penalty is imposed The Company No. of days of default (02.11.2018- 03.05.2020) Continuing default penalty (in INR) 5,48,000 (548*1000) 5,48,000 (548*1000) 5,48,000 (548*1000) Total Penalty First Default Penalty (in INR) Total Penalty (in INR) Maximum Penalty (in INR) 548 Days 5,00,000 10,48,000 10,00,000 Director 548 Days 50,000 5,98,000 5,00,000 Director 548 Days 50,000 5,98,000 5,00,000 21,00,000 M/s Dorin India Private Limited M/s Dorin India Private Limited (“The Company”), was incorporated in March 2014. Despite having a substantial paid-up capital, the company appointed a whole-time Company Secretary only on January 4, 2021, which was a significant delay. The case involves a 794-day delay in compliance with Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013, from November 2, 2018, to January 4, 2021. The following penalty was imposed on the Company and every Director and Key Managerial Personnel of the Company CS Tanvi Shah| Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. | Website - www.affluence.net.in |Email - connect@affluence.net.in

3. Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Significance Vis-À-Vis Repercussions of Non-Appointment of Company Secretary Person on whom penalty is imposed The Company No. of days of default (02.11.2018- 01.04.2021) Continuing default penalty (in INR) Actual Penalty imposed (in INR) First Default Penalty (in INR) Total Penalty (in INR) 794 Days 5,00,000 - 5,00,000 5,00,000 8,44,000 (794*1000) 8,44,000 (794*1000) Total Penalty Director 794 Days 50,000 8,94,000 5,00,000 Director 794 Days 50,000 8,94,000 5,00,000 15,00,000 CONCLUSION Company secretaries are often viewed as traditional gatekeepers within the corporate governance ecosystem. The proper functioning of the corporate sector depends on good corporate governance and good corporate governance depends on company secretaries who, as gatekeepers, must serve the interests of the company and the society with honesty and integrity. Disclaimer:This article provides general information existing at the time of preparation and we take no responsibility to update it with the subsequent changes in the law. The article is intended as a news update and Affluence Advisory neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this article. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on specific facts and circumstances. This article does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncement CS Tanvi Shah| Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. | Website - www.affluence.net.in |Email - connect@affluence.net.in