1 / 26

Augmenting Availability of Coal

Augmenting Availability of Coal. R B Mathur President (Coal). Inadequacy of Coal Supply.

Faraday
Download Presentation

Augmenting Availability of Coal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Augmenting Availability of Coal R B Mathur President (Coal)

  2. Inadequacy of Coal Supply Inadequacy of coal supply is a fact which is to be faced by accelerated growth of Coal Industry both in Public & Private Sectors. There is no run-away shortage as yet but the production – supply gap is increasing. The best part is that Indian Coal reserves are as under. A. Total reserves – 267.21 Billion Tons. B. Proved reserves – 105.82 Billion Tons. Indian coal reserves can last for 100 years easily if properly exploited.

  3. Top Ten Coal Producers of World (2008)

  4. Coal Consumption Pattern – Sector Wise (2008 – 09)

  5. Sea Borne – Coal Trade – AFRO – ASIAN Group

  6. Key issues to be addressed for sustainable supply of imported coal • Locating assured coal supply sources either entering into long-term agreement or owning a mines or combination of both. • Availability of dedicated/captive cargo vessel. • Modern exclusive deep sea coal terminals. • Developing mutually agreed long-term pricing mechanism for coal supply (Like Japan, Korea) • Identification of shadow fall back supply sources, in case of emergency. • Ensuring coal supply security (energy security) through bilateral Government level understanding.

  7. Dependence on coal supply • Indonesia - Best sources for power coal, but legal complications may sometimes result in cancellation of mining lease. Geological information not reliable & not available. • Mozambique – Green field area. Port capacity limited. Moputo & Bira are the only two ports. Burnt coal and high ash coal only one coal mine. Rail infrastructure under construction. • South Africa – Limited capacity of port. Richard bay coal terminal. • Australia – High price of coal – High freight.

  8. Issues on Captive Coal Block Mining Coal Sector has been most regulated sector of Indian Economy, most of it in Govt. control till 1993. However to meet increasing demand, captive coal mining is now allowed for following sectors. 1. Power 2. Steel including Sponge Iron 3. Cement 4. Coal Beneficiation 5. Conversion of Coal to Oil 6. Underground Coal Gasification. 7. Ministry of Petroleum & Natural gas allots coal bearing/ blocks for extraction of coal bed methane. Private Sector is happy that Coal Ministry has expanded the approved end uses. Industry welcomes it. It would still be better if coke making is also included as an approved enduse.

  9. Owning a coal-block • The annual requirement should justify owning a Coal – Mine as the coal – blocks are allotted for captive use only. • Faced with overall shortage of coal in he country, this is to be deliberated whether decision to allot coal blocks for captive use only is in national interest, specially when state owned PSUs are utilizing coal blocks allotted through State dispensation route for merchant use.

  10. Coal Consumer’s Concerns and Expectations - Owning a coal-block The details of coal blocks to the extent possible must be made readily available. • Location, extent of the area. • Geological data including quality & quantity. • Forest area or non forest area – Go Area or No-Go- Area. • Law and order problem. • Coal Evacuation arrangements. • Availability of areas for R & R sites, OB dumping and general information about land acquisition matters. • Harmonious development of coal consistent with preservation of environment. Private sector, too, is interested in harmonious development of coal consistent with preservation of Environment. JSPL’s plantation at Raigarh is an example.

  11. Owning a coal-block (contd.) Ministry of coal calls for comments from :

  12. Screening Committee The Screening Committee examines and then approves or rejects them

  13. Auctioning of Coal blocks through Competitive bidding (New concept) • Objective – To bring in greater transparency and demonstrate objectivity in allocation of coal & lignite blocks. • Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Amendment bill 2008 has been introduced in Rajya Sabha on 17.10.2008. • Hon’ble Minister for coal has already got OK signal from State Governments of coal bearing areas to go ahead with the proposed new concept of auctioning of coal blocks. • Private Sector is watching this new development with lot of interest

  14. Auctioning of Coal blocks through Competitive bidding (Contd…) (New concept) • Govt. will endeavour to provide all the possible data regarding each block. • FR, Mine valuation, financial modeling – Responsibility of bidder. • As regards coal blocks in forest and protected forest areas are concerned –Go areas & Non-Go areas will be identified in consultation with MOEF. • Categorization of coal blocks in three categories, good, average, and reasonable is not possible by Govt. • Competitive bidding in 2 parts, viz Technical bid and commercial bid. Bidder willing to set up industry in the same state will get preference. • R & R Policy – National or State whichever is better will be applicable.

  15. Comparison of 2 modes of Allotment

  16. Great improvement in allocation. 209 coal blocks have been offered so far till date Maximum number of coal block have been allotted in 2006, 2007, and 2008. The number of coal block allottees is 291 because 45 blocks have been allotted to more than one party. Mining Blocks – Any improvement in Allocation

  17. Allocation of coal blocks till 07/10/2009 Note: Geological reserves correspond to date of allocation and subject to change during approval of Mining Plan. Mill T

  18. Year-wise Allotment of Captive Coal Blocks as on 31/03/2009 No. of Coal Blocks 2009 Year of Allotment

  19. Production Trend from Allocated Coal Blocks vis-à-vis Projections

  20. Planwise Demand - Availability Projection Mill T

  21. Land Acquisition Problems • Employment claim by land losers irrespective of quantum of land. • Scarcity of suitable land for rehabilitation site. • Disagreement amongst members of the family of land losers regarding employment claim and validity of documents. • PAP resist against shifting to rehabilitation site. • Demand of higher rate of land compensation in excess of CIL R & R policy band LA & CBA Act. • Coal Block owners tend to acquire land at differential rates

  22. Environmental Issues • Long chain of processing proposals for FC should be simplified. • FC is given in 2 stages. One time final clearance may be adopted. • Excessive demand of compensation for forest land by State Governments. Demand should be as per F C Act, 1980. • Dispute over ownership of land between the forest and Revenue department. • Most of the cases, proposals are pending more than 3 to 5 years. • There is a need for reducing the time involved.

  23. Development of Captive Coal Mining Projects. Main reasons : - Besides Land, forestry and environmental problems other factors are: - • Lack of margin of profit in sponge iron industry in particular and Iron & Steel Industry in general. • Tendency to sell the company owning the coal block and making quick profit. • Awaiting relaxation for merchant sale of coal or to shift allocation from sponge iron to power. • State Governments sitting over ML applications and not forwarding the same to Central Government either due to unwillingness or due to absence of popular Government. • Grant of “prior approval” of Central Government for M.L. by State Government is in fact not required because block has been allotted by Central Government only.

  24. Yearwise Import of Coal during last 10 years Statistics apart, there is gap of only 6% in thermal coal and 70% in coking coal. There should be unrestricted import of coal and import should be completely exempted from custom duty.

  25. Conclusion • Nation needs coal for 3 prescribed sectors, viz, power, Steel & Cement. Hence block allottees should be permitted to change over from one sector to another at least once depending upon economic viability factor. • CBA (Act) 1957– should be applicable for LA to acquisition of land by PVT. Sector allocatees. Contract labor act should be amended to permit outsourcing of mining activities. • MOEF may be requested to honour the land mark decision and GO & NO-GO areas must be published. • In order to conserve our forests, Coal India may be advised to peg. coal production at a level of 600 million tons and Singareni at 60 million tons. Private Sector allocatees must be helped in practical way. Rest of the requirement of coal many be imported from countries like Indonesia, Australia, South Africa, Madagascar, Vietnam, and many other countries. • Workable coal reserves of India will last for only another 40 years. Hence, there should be greater emphasis on conservation of coal. • Coal imports should be exempted from custom duty. • Nodal agency to provide assistance to private sector mine developers should be created in Ministry of Coal.

  26. THANK YOU

More Related