590 likes | 786 Views
Unguided e-therapy for adults with depressive symptoms: IPT vs. CBT. Tara Donker a , Kathleen M. Griffiths b , Helen Christensen b , Kylie Bennett b , Anthony Bennett b , Annemieke van Straten a , Pim Cuijpers a a VU University, Amsterdam b Australian National University, Canberra .
E N D
Unguided e-therapy for adults with depressive symptoms: IPT vs. CBT Tara Donkera, Kathleen M. Griffithsb, Helen Christensenb, Kylie Bennettb , Anthony Bennettb, Annemieke van Stratena , Pim Cuijpersa a VU University, Amsterdam b Australian National University, Canberra
Introduction Life time prevalence: 19% (Bijl et al., 1998)
Introduction Top four leading causes of burden of disease worldwide (Lopez & Murray, 1998)
Introduction Costs per capita for mood disorders: € 5,009 (Smit et al., 2006)
Low-intensity treatment for depression and anxiety Marijke • 36 years • Single • Twochildren • Town • Part-timeworking • Mild depression
Obstacles Long waitlists
Obstacles 2 hrs of travelling to the clinic
Obstacles Take leave from work
Obstacles Arrange a babysit
Obstacles Costs of babysit
Obstacles +.. Costs of travelling, babysit..
Low-intensity treatment for depression and anxiety Psychological self-help: |Standardized Independent Homework/tasks Via book, audio, internet.. Guidance by email, chat, telephone
Advantages No wait lists
Advantages Working from home
Advantages 24/7
Advantages Cost-effective
Advantages Anonymous
Low-intensity treatment for depression and anxiety Intensive face-to face treatment Low-intensity treatment Obstacles • Wait lists • Costs of therapy etc. • Time of travelling • Leave/babysit Advantages • Directly accessable • Cost-effective • Working from home • 24/7
Introduction E-CBT = effective (e.g. Carlbring et al., 2009; Christensen et al., 2004;Kaldo et al., 2008; Ruwaard et al., 2009; Spek et al., 2008; Warmerdam et al., 2008)
Introduction Depression: IPT = CBT (Cuijpers et al., 2011) Effect size: 0.04 (95% CI 0.14-0.21)
Introduction = ?
Design Internet-assisted Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) & Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT):
Design Internet-assisted Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) & Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT): Compared to Internet-assisted CBT MoodGYM (control group)
Design • Non-inferiority trial • H0: (IPT ≠ CBT) ≠ MoodGYM • H1: (IPT= CBT) = MoodGYM
Design MoodGYM • Within effect size: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.33-0.79) (MacKinnon et al., 2008) • Determined sample size: N=450 on post-test
Design MoodGYM • Between effect size: 0.33 (95% CI: 0.11-0.55) • Within effect size: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.33-0.79) (MacKinnon et al., 2008) • Determined sample size: N=450 on post-test
Design • Non-inferiority trial • 3 e-conditions (IPT, New CBT, CBT MoodGYM) • Fully automated trial, 4 weeks • Online recruitment and screening
Design • Inclusion: 18 years or older • Exclusion: currently under treatment by mental health specialist • 3 measurements (baseline, after 4 weeks and after 6-months) • Primary outcome: depressive symptoms
Interpersonal Psychotherapy • Developed by Klerman and Weissman (1984) • Relationship between depression and experiences • IPT aims at improvement of interpersonal functioning and (inherent) depression
Internet-assisted IPT -week 1Role disputes • Identification of the dispute (with whom?) • Modification of communication patterns
Internet-assisted IPT -week 2Problems making relationships • Realistic evaluation of can do`s/ can`t do`s • Increase social contacts
Internet-assisted IPT - week 3 Role Changes • Investigate which old role is given up • Validate the loss • Support letting go of old role
Internet-assisted IPT - week 3 Role Changes • Develop new skills for the new role • Develop new relationships and social support
Internet-assisted IPT - week 4 Grief • Activate grief proces • Psychoeducation • Learn to express emotions • Finding new meaningful activities and social contacts replacing those which were lost
Results: Participant flow N=1993 met inclusion criteria n=69 did not fill in baseline Q N=1924 included MoodGYM n=642 IPT n=641 CBT n=641
Results: demographics • Gender: 71% female • Age category: 25-29 years (15.1%) • Country: 1: Australia (38%) • 2: United Kingdom (25%) • 3: United States (19%) • Education: higher degree (26%) • Previous treatment by professional: 80% • Been depressed before: 90%
Results: depressive symptoms Mean CES-D at baseline (n.s.): • Moodgym: 35 (sd: 11.7) n=622 • IPT: 36 (sd: 11.9) n=623 • CBT: 36 (sd: 11.) n=615
Results: depressive symptomscompleters only Pre-post test: • No significant differences across the condition (F=2.018; P=.13) • Effect sizes: MoodGYM: 0.81 CBT: 0.87 IPT: 0.77