E N D
1. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganics USEPA Scientist - to - Scientist MeetingLas Vegas, NevadaJune 14 - 15, 2000
Robert W. Puls, Ph.D.
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
2. OSWER Directive on MNA Recognizes monitored natural attenuation of inorganics in ground water and soils
Requires knowledge of specific mechanisms
Most applicable when contaminant is irreversibly immobilized
3. Presentation Topics Monitored Natural Attenuation of Metals
Processes controlling MNA
Site Characterization Issues
Research Questions
Factors Affecting MNA of Metals
NRMRL/SPRD Research
5. Site Characterization - InorganicsMonitored Natural Attenuation
6. Research Questions for MNA of Inorganics What are the important processes to measure for natural attenuation for metal contaminants?
How do you make these measurements?
How do you integrate these data to understand the behavior of the system?
7. Factors Affecting MNA of Inorganics Speciation (e.g. Cr(III), Cr(VI), As(III), As(V)
Geochemical factors
pH
Eh
DO
Water chemistry
Microbial activity
Sorbents
Mineralogy
9. NRMRL Research on MNA of Inorganics Laboratory studies of the role of mineralogy for MNA
Arsenic and Iron (Hydr)oxides (6400)
Solid phase speciation/extractions (4279)
Arsenic and Iron sulfides (7060)
Field studies of the natural attenuation of arsenic in an urban watershed (6401)
10. MNA of As in an Urban Watershed Aberjona watershed in Woburn, MA (industriplex site); pesticide manufacturer and tannery
Cooperative effort between ORD/NRMRL and region 1
Involves ground water, surface water, soils and sediments
Provide part of the science needed to develop guidance on MNA for metals
11. Industriplex Site, Woburn, MA
12. Holding Area Halls Brook
13. Plume Discharge into HBHA
15. Project Goal
21. Natural Attenuation of Metals During Sulfide FormationTask 7060 (Richard Wilkin)
22. Objectives (Task 7060) Laboratory studies to identify mechanisms of metal uptake and evaluate rates
Focus on As, Ni, Zn, Mn
Identify controls on attenuation capacity => reactive Fe, sulfate, organic C
Identify controls on formation of pure Me-sulfide vs. co-precipitation with Fe
Develop practices for field monitoring
23. Monitoring Oxidation-Reduction Processes in Ground waters, Sediments, and SoilsTask 6403 (Richard Wilkin) Objectives
DO methods comparison
Winkler titrations, colorimetric, electrodes
Eh interpretation: H2S/S° equilibrium
Develop methods to partition S in the solid phase
AVS, CRS, S°, S-organic, S-sulfate
24. EPA Workshop on Monitoring Oxidation-Reduction Processes for Ground Water Restoration
25. Task 4279 - Natural Attenuation of Inorganic Contaminants (Lab-based) Reliable/acceptable extractions to assess speciation on the solid phase?
Reliable/acceptable methods to assess oxidation capacities for soils/seds?
Reliable/acceptable methods to assess reduction capacities for soils/seds?
Cheap, fast, reliable analytical methods for solid phase speciation assessments?
26. SummaryNRMRL/SPRD MNA Research Mineralogy role in MNA (arsenic)
Fe and S cycling
Solid phase analyses, site assessment
extraction methods
Sample collection, preservation methods
arsenic speciation
solids analyses
Development of MNA protocols for field application
27. NRMRL/SPRD MNA Research & Mining Arsenic a common contaminant of mine wastes
Fe and S cycling important processes for mine waste site assessment and treatment
Solid phase analyses and extraction methods important for mine waste assessments
MNA may be an important part of any mine waste remedial measure