160 likes | 396 Views
Cervical adjacent segment degenerative disease ; Is it a natural history or fusion disease? -comparison between adjacent level of fusion and non-fusion segment-. Byung-Wan Choi, M.D., Byung-Ryeul Choi M.D., * Kyung-Jin Song, M.D. * and Kwang-Bok Lee , M.D. *
E N D
Cervical adjacent segment degenerative disease; Is it a natural history or fusion disease? -comparison between adjacent level of fusion and non-fusion segment- Byung-Wan Choi, M.D., Byung-Ryeul Choi M.D.,* Kyung-Jin Song, M.D. *and Kwang-Bok Lee, M.D.* Departmentsof Orthopedic Surgery Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Chonbuk National University Hospital * -We have no financial relationships to disclose-
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fusion itself can affect the adjacent segment degeneration or disease formation by comparing the radiological and clinical findings between adjacent to fusion segment and non-fusion segment in single level anterior fusion cases. PURPOSE
Adjacent to fusion level (Group A) Adjacent above level Fusion level Adjacent below level
Adjacent to non fusion level (Group B) Natural Segment Fusion level
Radiological criteria of degeneration (Criteria I) 1. Modified Hilibrand`s adjacent segmental disc degeneration. -JBJS 1999- Grade Disease Plain Radiography ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I None Normal II Mild Narrowing of disc space (<50%), no posterior osteophytes III Moderate 50< X<75% of normal disc height, posterior osteophyte IV Severe > 75% of disc height posterior osteophyte ---------------------------------------
Radiological criteria of degeneration (Criteria II) 2. Development of adjacent-level ossification - Park et al, JBJS 2005- Grade II : extended across < 50% of the disc space Grade I : none Grade IV : complete bridging Grade III : across > 50 % of the disc space
Radiological criteria of degeneration (Criteria III) 3. Segmental instability - More than 3mm displacement in flexion/extension - Abnormal motion -Dvorak et al, 1988 Spine- Flex Ext Flex Ext 62 Ms
Adjacent segment disease - interbody fusion may lead to increases in mechanical stress at adjacent disc levels, thereby accelerating degenerative changes and producing clinical symptoms with time: the so-called ‘adjacent segment disease’. - Clinical evaluation of new radicular or myelopathic symptom occurrence for evaluation of ‘adjacent segment disease’. → Follow up MRI was performed.
Incidence of radiological degenerative change 1. The percentage of the cases showed degenerative change (according to fusion or not) Group A Group B 38/457(8%)
Incidence of radiological degenerative change 2. The number of the cases showed degenerative change (in the cases of adjacent to fusion) Group A
Analysis according to radiographic criteria (Criteria I) (Criteria II) (Criteria III)
Incidence of degenerative disease Total: 4 cases/ 87 patient (4%) In group A: 2/174 segment(1%) → 1 re-operation (58ms) 58 Ms
Incidence of degenerative disease Total: 4 cases/ 87 patient (4%) In group B: 2/283 segment(0.7%) → 1 re-operation(64ms) p=0.59 64 Ms
Fusion itself can accelerate the severity of adjacent level degeneration as compared with non-fusion. But there was no correlation in the incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment diseases according to the fusion in single level anterior cervical arthrodesis for the degenerative cervical diseases. Adjacent segment disease is more a result of the natural history. CONCLUSION