1 / 50

The Bell Curve:

The Bell Curve:. Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Richard J. Herrnstein Charles Murray. Emergence of the Cognitive Elite. “The twentieth century dawned on a world segregated into social classes defined in terms of money, power, and status. ... Our

JasminFlorian
Download Presentation

The Bell Curve:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life Richard J. Herrnstein Charles Murray

  2. Emergence of the Cognitive Elite “The twentieth century dawned on a world segregated into social classes defined in terms of money, power, and status. ... Our thesis is that the twentieth century has continued the transformation [of the origin of social class], so that the twenty-first will open on a world in which cognitive ability is the decisive driving force. ... Social class remains the vehicle of social life, but intelligence now pulls the train.” Herrnstein and Murray, p. 25

  3. 2) Greater efficiency in selecting college students for cognitive ability. The beta weights shifted for college = merit + parental status   Arguments: 1) Greater access to higher education. 3) Occupational status has became more dependent upon cognitive ability.

  4. Assumptions & Evidence 1. Intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, is meaningful and stable. 2. Intelligence runs in families; assortative mating for intelligence. 3. Intelligence has a direct causal role in eventual social status. 4. Society has become increasingly efficient in selecting for intelligence in education and occupations.

  5. Predictions: • An increasingly isolated cognitive elite. • A merging of the cognitive elite with the affluent. • A deteriorating quality of life for people at the bottom end of the cognitive ability distribution. Herrnstein and Murray, , p. 509

  6. “Unchecked, these trends will lead the U.S. towards something resembling a caste system, with the underclass mired ever more deeply at the bottom and the cognitive elite ever more firmly anchored at the top, restructuring the rules of society so that it becomes harder and harder for them to lose.” Herrnstein and Murray, p.509

  7. Topics: 1. What is intelligence? 2. How stabile is intelligence? 3. Does it run in families? 4. Does it influence eventual social status? 5. Is a meritocracy evolving?

  8. 1. What is Intelligence?

  9. Analogies: pastis to present as presentis to ______ dog is to god as rat is to ______

  10. Vocabulary: Respirate means: A. sweat B. give back C. breathe D. continue Garrulous means: A. angry B. talkative C. unruly D. stupid

  11. Sentences: Rearrange the following: him not ask do. four square every has sides.

  12. Syntactic Inference: (fill in the blank) A pervish wib kelted edfully. I bellishly smusted the ____. a) pervish b) edfully c) kelted d) wib

  13. Numerical Reasoning: Jane is 6. She is twice as old as Billy. How old will Billy be when Jane is 8?

  14. Number Series: 2, 4, 8, 16, ___ . 2, 3, 5, 8, ___ .

  15. Figure Completions: ____ a b c d e

  16. Correlates of IQ Tests 1) Other IQ tests (.90) 2) Standardized Tests 2.a) verbal & math ability (.80) 2.b) content areas (.70) 3) School grades (.60)

  17. 2. How stabile is intelligence?

  18. Stability of IQ: “Up to about 4 or 5 ..., measures of IQ are not of much use in predicting later IQ.” “Between ages 5 and 10, the tests rapidly become more predictive of adult IQ.” “After about the age of 10, the IQ score is essentially stable within the constraints of measurement error.” Herrnstein & Murray, p. 130

  19. Stability of IQ Age Age 7 10 9 5 6 8 5 1.00 6 .88 1.00 7 .78 .87 1.00 8 .81 .88 .91 1.00 9 .77 .87 .91 .92 1.00 10 .78 .83 .90 .71 .94 1.00 Fels Longitudinal Study (N=80)

  20. Stability of IQ Age Age 12 17 15 10 11 14 10 1.00 11 .94 1.00 12 .92 .93 1.00 14 .86 .86 .90 1.00 15 .86 .86 .90 .88 1.00 17 .69 .67 .74 .71 .89 1.00 Fels Longitudinal Study (N=80)

  21. 3. Does intelligence run in families?

  22. Correlations: Raised Together Identical Twins .86 .60 Fraternal Twins .47 Siblings .42 Parent-offspring Half-siblings .31 Cousins .15 Mates .40 Bouchard & McGue (1981), Science, 212, 1055-1059.

  23. Correlations: Raised Apart Identical Twins .72 .24 Siblings .22 Parent-offspring Bouchard & McGue (1981), Science, 212, 1055-1059.

  24. Correlations: Nongenetic Relatives .31 Adoptive Siblings .19 Adoptive Parent-offspring Bouchard & McGue (1981), Science, 212, 1055-1059.

  25. Correlations: Raised Together Raised Apart Identical Twins .86 .72 .47 .24 Siblings .42 .22 Parent-offspring Bouchard & McGue (1981), Science, 212, 1055-1059.

  26. 4. Does intelligence influence eventual social status?

  27. Herrnstein and Murray, p. 149

  28. Herrnstein and Murray, p. 134

  29. Social Outcomes and IQ Percent: Cognitive Class Unemployed > 1 month (1989) No HS Diploma Poverty (1989) Chronic Welfare Divorced 0 2 2 0 9 I. Very Bright 0 3 7 2 15 II. Bright 6 6 7 8 23 III. Normal 35 16 10 17 22 IV. Dull 55 30 12 31 21 V. Very Dull Herrnstein & Murray, NLSY data (whites)

  30. Social Outcomes and IQ Percent: Cognitive Class Low HOME Index Illegitimate Child Low Birth- weight Low IQ Child 2 5 0 0 I. Very Bright 4 2 7 2 II. Bright 8 3 6 6 III. Normal 17 7 17 11 IV. Dull 32 6 39 24 V. Very Dull Herrnstein & Murray, NLSY data (whites)

  31. IQ and Social Status Father’s: Own IQ Education Occupation .38 .37 .47 Education .26 .29 .36 Occupation .18 .18 .35 Income PSID Data (N=1774)

  32. IQ and Social Status Father’s: Own IQ Education Occupation .30 .31 .55 Education .26 .30 .43 Occupation .14 .27 .35 Income Veterans (N=803)

  33. IQ and Social Status Father’s: Own IQ Education Occupation .40 .38 .58 Education First .35 .39 .45 Occupation Later .22 .22 .45 Occupation .17 .20 .36 Income Kalamazoo Brothers (N=300)

  34. Standardized Regression Coefficients Independent Variables Family Back- ground Occupa- tion Educa- tion Dependent Variable: Test Test .43 .29 .44 Education Occupation .06 .15 .53 Earnings .06 .06 .08 .15 Project Talent (N=839)

  35. Standardized Regression Coefficients Independent Variables Family Back- ground Occupa- tion Educa- tion Dependent Variable: Test Test .25 .28 .40 Education Occupation .07 .07 .55 - Earnings .01 .17 .24 .20 PSID (N=1,774)

  36. Standardized Regression Coefficients Independent Variables Family Back- ground Occupa- tion Educa- tion Dependent Variable: Test Test .34 .30 .45 Education Occupation .16 .12 .45 - Earnings .14 .20 .01 .23 Veterans (N=803)

  37. Standardized Regression Coefficients Independent Variables Family Back- ground Dependent Variable: Current Occ. First Occ. Educa- tion Test Test .38 .41 Education .43 First Occup. .19 .03 .59 - Current Occ. .09 .29 .15 .34 .03 Current Earn. .12 .14 .10 .21 Kalamazoo Brothers (N=300)

  38. FB IQ $$ ED OC

  39. IQ and Crime “Among the most firmly established facts about criminal offenders is that their distribution of IQ scores differs from that of the population at large. Taking the scientific literature as a whole, criminal offenders have average IQs of about 92, eight points below the mean.” Herrnstein and Murray, p. 235

  40. IQ and Crime: Conclusions “ In trying to understand how to deal with the crime problem, much of the attention now given to problems of poverty and unemployment should be shifted to another question altogether: coping with cognitive disadvantage.” Herrnstein and Murray, p. 251

  41. Crime and IQ Percent: Cognitive Class Ever Convicted Ever Incarcerated Stopped by Police Ever Booked 3 18 0 5 I. Very Bright 7 27 1 12 II. Bright 15 37 3 20 III. Normal 46 21 7 27 IV. Dull 14 7 17 33 V. Very Dull Herrnstein & Murray, NLSY data (white males), p. 247

  42. IQ and Delinquency: Boys adapted from White, Moffitt, & Silva (1989)

  43. IQ and Delinquency: Girls adapted from White, Moffitt, & Silva (1989)

  44. Substance Abusing and Control Male Teenage Probands ASA-I (unpublished)

  45. Relatives of Substance Abusing and Control Male Teenage Probands ASA-I (unpublished)

  46. V iq .46 P iq -.13 -.05 -.07 .01 -.06 -.03 alco- hol CD/ ASP drugs ASA-I (unpublished)

  47. 5. Is a cognitive meritocracy evolving?

  48. Family Background Individual Merit Eventual Status Heritocracy & Meritocracy

  49. Rethinking Ethnic Differences “If the reader is now convinced that either the genetic or environmental explanation has won out to the exclusion of the other, we have not done a sufficiently good job of presenting one side or the other. It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences. What might the mix be? We are resolutely agnostic on that issue.” Herrnstein and Murray, p. 311

  50. And, on the next page ... “... we have found that the genetic aspect of ethnic differences has assumed an overwhelming importance. One symptom of this is that while this book was in preparation and regardless of how we described it to anyone who asked, it was assumed that the book’s real subject had to be not only ethnic differences in cognitive ability but the genetic source of those differences.” Herrnstein and Murray, p. 312

More Related