420 likes | 777 Views
April 2006. ICAO Seminar Baku. Structure. Why SMS?The principlesShell's experienceImplementation experienceConclusion . April 2006. ICAO Seminar Baku. . April 2006. ICAO Seminar Baku. Why Safety Management Systems?. Safety is a right for customers and staffPoor safety performance is a sensitive indicator of poor operations
E N D
1. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Principles and Elements of SMSA Review Patrick Hudson
ICAO/Leiden University
2. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Structure Why SMS?
The principles
Shells experience
Implementation experience
Conclusion
3. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku This slide is intended to show that there are various ways of improving safety performance and that tackling technology and standards and safety systems usually comes first, but in order to continuously improve the softer behavioural stuff must be tackled too. This is what constitutes Culture, which addresses the softer human issues, but also multiplies the effectiveness of the technology and management systems.
This slide is intended to show that there are various ways of improving safety performance and that tackling technology and standards and safety systems usually comes first, but in order to continuously improve the softer behavioural stuff must be tackled too. This is what constitutes Culture, which addresses the softer human issues, but also multiplies the effectiveness of the technology and management systems.
4. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Why Safety Management Systems? Safety is a right for customers and staff
Poor safety performance is a sensitive indicator of poor operations
If you cant manage safety, how can you show you can manage anything else?
Safety management systems are about getting systematic about the problems
5. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Safety Management SystemA framework for Safety Management
6. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
7. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Early Safety Management Early safety management was an unstructured mixture of good things
Progress was based upon response to accidents
Measures were outcome based (crashes etc)
There were no process definitions (how to do it)
Regulations prescribed exactly what to do (what to do)
This works very well to start with, but expectations have been raised over the years, now everyone expects that every flight is safe
8. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Types of Certification There are three distinct ways of guaranteeing safety
Type I - Classical ICAO/FAA/JAA certification
Type II - Safety Cases and SMS
Type III - Safety Culture and Good Practice
These different approaches are complementary, especially II and III
Types I and II are Imagination Limited
Can people imagine what might go wrong
Type III involves doing The Right Thing anyway
9. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
10. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
11. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Why have a Safety Management System? A number of major disasters in the Petrochemical industry
Flixborough
Seveso
Bhopal
Nuclear disasters
Three Mile Island
Chernobyl
12. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Flixborough1 June 1974
13. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku SevesoJuly 1976 Understanding safe state to leave reactions
Multiple layers of protection
Automated Reaction stop systems for exothermic systems
14. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Longford25 September 1998
15. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Piper Alpha 1988 the Piper Alpha platform was destroyed
The platform had just been audited by the regulator
Lord Cullens report set up a new regime
Goal Setting
ISO 9000 type management systems
Safety Case to provide assurance - a documented proof that the SMS is both in operation and effective
16. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
17. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
18. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
19. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Piper Alpha Cost $1,500,000,000
167 killed
Occidental UK went out of business in two years
20. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku The Cullen Report Cullen investigated the Piper Alpha disaster
Report was published 1990
Requirement made for every offshore facility to have an SMS in place by November 1992
Proof by submission of a safety case
If there was no acceptable safety case the operation would be shut down immediately
21. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Shell Internationals Approach Shell is the largest operator in the North Sea - SMS was made mandatory
Shell decided to get in first rather than wait
A considered approach was designed
The requirement for SMS was to be made world-wide for all Shell Group companies
22. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Shells Approach - dont do everything Decision to operate in terms of hazards and a limited set of events to avoid
Developed the Bow-tie model (next slides)
Identification of safety critical activities to provide assurance
Getting in first meant that they wouldnt have to operate a system foreign to their culture
23. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
24. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
25. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku The Swiss cheese model ofaccident causation (Reason)
26. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku SAFETY MANAGEMENTBased on the Reason Model Good understanding of the world in which you operate
ditto of the work
identify what can go wrong and lead to undesirable outcomes
put barriers in place (hard vs soft)
assign tasks to people to make barriers and keep them in place
people to be competent
people require instructions and standards
communication essential to inform each other of malfunctioning barriers, so that others can make sure that their barrier remains effective
Good understanding of the world in which you operate
ditto of the work
identify what can go wrong and lead to undesirable outcomes
put barriers in place (hard vs soft)
assign tasks to people to make barriers and keep them in place
people to be competent
people require instructions and standards
communication essential to inform each other of malfunctioning barriers, so that others can make sure that their barrier remains effective
27. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Safety Management Cycle
28. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Hazard-based approach Construct a generic hazard register
Assess which are relevant for a particular operation
Use a Business Process Model to identify safety critical processes that allow management of the hazards
Construct Bow Ties for control and recovery
29. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku HEMP HEMP - Hazard and Effects Management Process
Identify - What are the hazards?
Assess - how big are those hazards?
Control - how do we control the hazards?
Recover - what if it still goes wrong?
30. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Bow-tie Concept Explain model
Barriers to stop progression from left to right
Risk management is about identifying hazards, putting barriers in place and keeping them in place.
Barriers can be :
hardware,
procedures,
competence
emergency preparedness etc
Activities required to achieve this:
policy, organisation, standards, improvement loops etc.
EXPLAIN VARIOUS DOCUMENTED SYSTEMS:
HSE-MS, demonstration of assurance that there is a system to identify barriers and keep them in place
HSE-Case, specifying which specific barriers have been put in place, to what specification, who is responsible for keeping it in place, required competency etc.
PTW, workplace hazards management system; controlling the Hazards during execution of tasks
Most of these elements have been discussed during the previous days. I will concentrate on the various improvement loops and, as many of our activities involve contractors, the management of contractors
Explain model
Barriers to stop progression from left to right
Risk management is about identifying hazards, putting barriers in place and keeping them in place.
Barriers can be :
hardware,
procedures,
competence
emergency preparedness etc
Activities required to achieve this:
policy, organisation, standards, improvement loops etc.
EXPLAIN VARIOUS DOCUMENTED SYSTEMS:
HSE-MS, demonstration of assurance that there is a system to identify barriers and keep them in place
HSE-Case, specifying which specific barriers have been put in place, to what specification, who is responsible for keeping it in place, required competency etc.
PTW, workplace hazards management system; controlling the Hazards during execution of tasks
Most of these elements have been discussed during the previous days. I will concentrate on the various improvement loops and, as many of our activities involve contractors, the management of contractors
31. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
32. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Bow-tie Conceptfor a specific threat Explain model
Barriers to stop progression from left to right
Risk management is about identifying hazards, putting barriers in place and keeping them in place.
Barriers can be :
hardware,
procedures,
competence
emergency preparedness etc
Activities required to achieve this:
policy, organisation, standards, improvement loops etc.
EXPLAIN VARIOUS DOCUMENTED SYSTEMS:
HSE-MS, demonstration of assurance that there is a system to identify barriers and keep them in place
HSE-Case, specifying which specific barriers have been put in place, to what specification, who is responsible for keeping it in place, required competency etc.
PTW, workplace hazards management system; controlling the Hazards during execution of tasks
Most of these elements have been discussed during the previous days. I will concentrate on the various improvement loops and, as many of our activities involve contractors, the management of contractors
Explain model
Barriers to stop progression from left to right
Risk management is about identifying hazards, putting barriers in place and keeping them in place.
Barriers can be :
hardware,
procedures,
competence
emergency preparedness etc
Activities required to achieve this:
policy, organisation, standards, improvement loops etc.
EXPLAIN VARIOUS DOCUMENTED SYSTEMS:
HSE-MS, demonstration of assurance that there is a system to identify barriers and keep them in place
HSE-Case, specifying which specific barriers have been put in place, to what specification, who is responsible for keeping it in place, required competency etc.
PTW, workplace hazards management system; controlling the Hazards during execution of tasks
Most of these elements have been discussed during the previous days. I will concentrate on the various improvement loops and, as many of our activities involve contractors, the management of contractors
33. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
34. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Hazard Management and Control Bow Ties describe the hazards and the relevant controls
Controls are provided by elements in the business processes
Top events are a restricted set of unwanted events, not the final outcomes
35. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Bow Ties as Standard The Bow Tie is now the standard for the FAA in the USA
There are a number of computer packages for making and maintaining bow ties
The information needed can be shared
Local differences are easily accommodated
36. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Shells HSE MANAGEMENTputting it together Good understanding of the world in which you operate
ditto of the work
identify what can go wrong and lead to undesirable outcomes
put barriers in place (hard vs soft)
assign tasks to people to make barriers and keep them in place
people to be competent
people require instructions and standards
communication essential to inform each other of malfunctioning barriers, so that others can make sure that their barrier remains effective
Good understanding of the world in which you operate
ditto of the work
identify what can go wrong and lead to undesirable outcomes
put barriers in place (hard vs soft)
assign tasks to people to make barriers and keep them in place
people to be competent
people require instructions and standards
communication essential to inform each other of malfunctioning barriers, so that others can make sure that their barrier remains effective
37. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku HSE MS in place
38. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Advantages of an SMS The SMS provides a structure for measuring in system audits
Bow ties provide a structure for operational audits
Are the barriers there?
Are the barriers intact and in operation
Is there sufficient defence- are there single point trajectories where everything relies on a single defence?
The analysis of barriers and operations also provides a basis for incident investigation that is consistent with the Reason model
39. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku What does it take? Regulators can force implementation, but it is much easier if you want to do it anyway
Top management has to be convinced that implementing an SMS is in their interest
Shell had to implement in the North Sea, but decided to make SMS obligatory world-wide in view of the benefits to Shell group
BP and ExxonMobil have taken exactly the same approach with GHSSER and OIMS
You have to do it yourself
Hiring consultants can only be as support
An off-the-shelf SMS will soon fail
40. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
41. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku
42. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku Conclusion Safety management systems turn safety into a systematic process
Development can be done with sharing of information and experience - you dont compete on safety
SMS models can be used to unify management, audit and incident investigation
SMS does not guarantee everything - to get ahead you need to develop a safety culture as well - tomorrow
43. April 2006 ICAO Seminar Baku